On Mon, 2004-07-26 at 12:21, Michel Bouissou wrote:
Le lundi 26 Juillet 2004 21:08, Greg Connor a écrit :
Eventually, if Submitter becomes widely used,
we will reach a point where SUBMITTER is either there, or we fall back
to MAIL FROM, and then we will be close to where SPF Classic would be if
we had continued down the SRS path.
Is there actually a technical reason why we shouldn't continue down the
Classic-SPF + SRS path ? SRS makes sense to me, much more that SUBMITTER and
PRA which interest is yet very unclear in my mind (but the complication it
introduces is ;-)
I would hope this could be the direction taken. I would see SRS being
transformed into incorporating BATV or perhaps the other way around.
Either way, I see NO use for the PRA or Submitter scheme unless the goal
is to break mail and have messages go missing. ;^)