Re: DEPLOY - IPR on Sender-ID not sufficiently disclosed

ietf-mxcomp

2004-08-24 12:35:19



On Aug 24, 2004, at 3:15 PM, Koen Martens wrote:

Is it correct that this means that Sender-ID itself as well as PRA are
patent pending by microsoft?


Please don't get hung up on the file names of the drafts.

Does this also mean that in effect, large parts of the spf syntax are
now microsofts property or will be so in the near future?


Just how do you arrive at this conclusion?

-andy

<Prev in Thread]	Current Thread	[Next in Thread>
DEPLOY - IPR on Sender-ID not sufficiently disclosed, Graham Murray Re: DEPLOY - IPR on Sender-ID not sufficiently disclosed, Andrew Newton Re: DEPLOY - IPR on Sender-ID not sufficiently disclosed, Ryan Ordway Re: DEPLOY - IPR on Sender-ID not sufficiently disclosed, Graham Murray Re: DEPLOY - IPR on Sender-ID not sufficiently disclosed, Koen Martens Re: DEPLOY - IPR on Sender-ID not sufficiently disclosed, Andrew Newton <= Re: DEPLOY - IPR on Sender-ID not sufficiently disclosed, Koen Martens Re: DEPLOY - IPR on Sender-ID not sufficiently disclosed, Mark Lentczner Re: DEPLOY - IPR on Sender-ID not sufficiently disclosed, Mark C. Langston Re: DEPLOY - IPR on Sender-ID not sufficiently disclosed, Stephane Bortzmeyer RE: DEPLOY - IPR on Sender-ID not sufficiently disclosed, Hallam-Baker, Phillip RE: DEPLOY - IPR on Sender-ID not sufficiently disclosed, terry RE: DEPLOY - IPR on Sender-ID not sufficiently disclosed, Harry Katz

Previous by Date:	RE: DEPLOY: Microsoft Royalty Free Sender ID Patent License, terry
Next by Date:	Re: DEPLOY - IPR on Sender-ID not sufficiently disclosed, Mark C. Langston
Previous by Thread:	Re: DEPLOY - IPR on Sender-ID not sufficiently disclosed, Koen Martens
Next by Thread:	Re: DEPLOY - IPR on Sender-ID not sufficiently disclosed, Koen Martens
Indexes:	[Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]