-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Mark Shewmaker wrote:
| On Tue, 2004-08-24 at 16:48, Eric Allman wrote:
|
|>As near as I can tell, the question
|>of GPL compatibility is quite ambiguous at this time.
|
| I'm sorry, but the [L]GPL incompatibility couldn't be more unambiguous:
Aaaah! Help me out here, I don't understand this empircal statement.
"I'm sorry, but the [L] GPL incompatibility couldn't be more unambiguous:"
Okay, "I'm sorry, but the [L] GPL /in/compatibility could /not/ be more
/un/ambiguous:"
So, does that mean the GPL compatibility could not be more ambiguous, or
is it the opposite?
Or, does that mean the GPL compatibility could be more unambiguous?
I'm not splitting hairs, I really am not sure what is the point.
Thanks for any enlightenment.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org
iD8DBQFBLJbia44x14FCa6ARAueuAJwODtN5o2W7cKX4W7RrOZGi2MalcACePi0R
8WCyp2PRwXWh71mGORE/fVA=
=A+MD
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----