IETF MARID (date)

May 31, 2005

Re: draft-schlitt-spf-classic-01.txt, Hector Santos, 21:38
Re: Resent- header fields, Douglas Otis, 13:35
Re: draft-schlitt-spf-classic-01.txt, Douglas Otis, 12:07
[spf-help] Re: SPF and SenderID, Frank Ellermann, 07:49
Re: draft-schlitt-spf-classic-01.txt, Graham Murray, 02:49

May 29, 2005

Re: draft-schlitt-spf-classic-01.txt, Douglas Otis, 13:58
Re: Resent- header fields, william(at)elan.net, 08:55
Resent- header fields, william(at)elan.net, 07:31
Re: SPF PASS, Frank Ellermann, 02:55

May 27, 2005

Re: SPF PASS (was: "If you believe that the SPF concept is fundam entally flawed, please subscribe at http://www.imc.org/ietf-mxcomp/"), Hector Santos, 23:11
RE: SPF PASS (was: "If you believe that the SPF concept is fundam entally flawed, please subscribe at http://www.imc.org/ietf-mxcomp/"), Hallam-Baker, Phillip, 21:25
Re: draft-schlitt-spf-classic-01.txt, Terry Fielder, 19:06
Re: draft-schlitt-spf-classic-01.txt, Alan DeKok, 17:31
Re: draft-schlitt-spf-classic-01.txt, Douglas Otis, 17:10
Re: draft-schlitt-spf-classic-01.txt, Alan DeKok, 15:24
Re: draft-schlitt-spf-classic-01.txt, Douglas Otis, 14:36
Re: draft-schlitt-spf-classic-01.txt, Terry Fielder, 05:43

May 26, 2005

Re: draft-schlitt-spf-classic-01.txt, Douglas Otis, 21:02
RE: Addressing Backward Compatibility [was Re: SPF PASS], John Glube, 14:31
Re: draft-schlitt-spf-classic-01.txt, Julian Mehnle, 14:18
overall HELO FAIL (was: SPF PASS), Frank Ellermann, 14:12
Re: SPF and SenderID, Frank Ellermann, 13:43
Re: SPF PASS (was: "If you believe that the SPF concept is fundam entally flawed, please subscribe at http://www.imc.org/ietf-mxcomp/"), Carl Hutzler, 13:34
RE: SPF PASS (was: "If you believe that the SPF concept is fundam entally flawed, please subscribe at http://www.imc.org/ietf-mxcomp/"), Scott Kitterman, 13:29
Re: SPF PASS, wayne, 13:15
RE: SPF and HELO, was Re: SPF PASS, Sauer, Damon, 13:13
Re: Addressing Backward Compatibility [was Re: SPF PASS], Carl Hutzler, 13:08
draft-schlitt-spf-classic-01.txt, Douglas Otis, 13:02
Re: "If you believe that the SPF concept is fundamentally flawed, please subscribe at http://www.imc.org/ietf-mxcomp/", wayne, 12:58
Re: SPF and HELO, was Re: SPF PASS, wayne, 12:49
Re: SPF PASS, Frank Ellermann, 12:43
HELO and MAIL FROM are separate identities; reputation on a per-domain basis instead of per-IP (was: SPF PASS), Julian Mehnle, 12:31
Re: SPF and HELO, Julian Mehnle, 12:25
Re: SPF and HELO, was Re: SPF PASS, Terry Fielder, 12:12
Re: "If you believe that the SPF concept is fundamentally flawed, please subscribe at http://www.imc.org/ietf-mxcomp/", Terry Fielder, 12:05
Re: SPF and HELO, was Re: SPF PASS, Terry Fielder, 12:04
Re: SPF and HELO, was Re: SPF PASS, wayne, 12:03
Re: SPF and HELO, Frank Ellermann, 12:02
RE: SPF PASS (was: "If you believe that the SPF concept is fundam entally flawed, please subscribe at http://www.imc.org/ietf-mxcomp/"), Mark, 11:56
Re: SPF and HELO, was Re: SPF PASS, John L, 11:56
Re: "If you believe that the SPF concept is fundamentally flawed, please subscribe at http://www.imc.org/ietf-mxcomp/", Richard Clayton, 11:55
Re: SPF PASS, Terry Fielder, 11:50
Re: SPF PASS, Frank Ellermann, 11:49
Re: "If you believe that the SPF concept is fundamentally flawed,please subscribe at http://www.imc.org/ietf-mxcomp/", Julian Mehnle, 11:46
Re: SPF PASS, william(at)elan.net, 11:42
Re: SPF and HELO, was Re: SPF PASS, Terry Fielder, 11:39
Re: SPF PASS, Frank Ellermann, 11:39
RE: "If you believe that the SPF concept is fundamentally flawed, please subscribe at http://www.imc.org/ietf-mxcomp/", Mark, 11:37
Re: SPF PASS (was: "If you believe that the SPF concept is fundam entally flawed, please subscribe at http://www.imc.org/ietf-mxcomp/"), Julian Mehnle, 11:36
Re: SPF and HELO, was Re: SPF PASS (was: "If you believe that the SPF concept is fundamentally flawed, please subscribe at http://www.imc.org/ietf-mxcomp/"), Julian Mehnle, 11:30
Re: SPF and HELO, was Re: SPF PASS, John L, 11:28
Re: SPF PASS (was: "If you believe that the SPF concept is fundam entally flawed, please subscribe at http://www.imc.org/ietf-mxcomp/"), wayne, 11:04
Re: SPF PASS, Terry Fielder, 11:03
Re: SPF and HELO, was Re: SPF PASS, Terry Fielder, 11:03
Re: SPF and HELO, was Re: SPF PASS (was: "If you believe that the SPF concept is fundamentally flawed, please subscribe at http://www.imc.org/ietf-mxcomp/"), wayne, 10:55
Addressing Backward Compatibility [was Re: SPF PASS], Hector Santos, 10:35
Re: SPF and HELO, was Re: SPF PASS (was: "If you believe that the SPF concept is fundamentally flawed, please subscribe at http://www.imc.org/ietf-mxcomp/"), Tony Finch, 10:19
Re: "If you believe that the SPF concept is fundamentally flawed, please subscribe at http://www.imc.org/ietf-mxcomp/", wayne, 10:18
Re: "If you believe that the SPF concept is fundamentally flawed,please subscribe at http://www.imc.org/ietf-mxcomp/", wayne, 10:13
Re: SPF PASS (was: "If you believe that the SPF concept is fundam entally flawed, please subscribe at http://www.imc.org/ietf-mxcomp/"), John Levine, 10:10
Re: SPF and HELO, was Re: SPF PASS (was: "If you believe that the SPF concept is fundamentally flawed, please subscribe at http://www.imc.org/ietf-mxcomp/"), John Levine, 10:08
Re: SPF and HELO, was Re: SPF PASS (was: "If you believe that the SPF concept is fundamentally flawed, please subscribe at http://www.imc.org/ietf-mxcomp/"), wayne, 10:03
Re: SPF and HELO, was Re: SPF PASS (was: "If you believe that the SPF concept is fundamentally flawed, please subscribe at http://www.imc.org/ietf-mxcomp/"), william(at)elan.net, 09:44
Re: "If you believe that the SPF concept is fundamentally flawed, please subscribe at http://www.imc.org/ietf-mxcomp/", Richard Clayton, 09:42
Re: SPF PASS (was: "If you believe that the SPF concept is fundam entally flawed, please subscribe at http://www.imc.org/ietf-mxcomp/"), william(at)elan.net, 09:20
SPF and HELO, was Re: SPF PASS (was: "If you believe that the SPF concept is fundamentally flawed, please subscribe at http://www.imc.org/ietf-mxcomp/"), Tony Finch, 09:14
Re: SPF PASS (was: "If you believe that the SPF concept is fundam entally flawed, please subscribe at http://www.imc.org/ietf-mxcomp/"), Carl Hutzler, 08:40
Re: SPF PASS (was: "If you believe that the SPF concept is fundam entally flawed, please subscribe at http://www.imc.org/ietf-mxcomp/"), william(at)elan.net, 08:34
Re: "If you believe that the SPF concept is fundamentally flawed,please subscribe at http://www.imc.org/ietf-mxcomp/", Carl Hutzler, 07:48
Re: SPF PASS (was: "If you believe that the SPF concept is fundam entally flawed, please subscribe at http://www.imc.org/ietf-mxcomp/"), Andrew Newton, 07:43
RE: "If you believe that the SPF concept is fundamentally flawed,please subscribe at http://www.imc.org/ietf-mxcomp/", Mark, 07:02
Re: "If you believe that the SPF concept is fundamentally flawed, please subscribe at http://www.imc.org/ietf-mxcomp/", Arnt Gulbrandsen, 06:40
RE: "If you believe that the SPF concept is fundamentally flawed, please subscribe at http://www.imc.org/ietf-mxcomp/", Mark, 06:15
RE: "If you believe that the SPF concept is fundamentally flawed, please subscribe at http: //www.imc.org/ietf-mxcomp/", Sauer, Damon, 05:51
Re: SPF PASS, Frank Ellermann, 05:20
RE: SPF PASS (was: "If you believe that the SPF concept is fundam entally flawed, please subscribe at http://www.imc.org/ietf-mxcomp/"), Sukhenko, Alex, 04:40
Re: SPF PASS (was: "If you believe that the SPF concept is fundamentally flawed, please subscribe at http://www.imc.org/ietf-mxcomp/"), Carl Hutzler, 04:20
Re: "If you believe that the SPF concept is fundamentally flawed, please subscribe at http://www.imc.org/ietf-mxcomp/", Carl Hutzler, 04:12
SPF PASS (was: "If you believe that the SPF concept is fundamentally flawed, please subscribe at http://www.imc.org/ietf-mxcomp/"), Frank Ellermann, 04:07

May 25, 2005

Re: "If you believe that the SPF concept is fundamentally flawed, please subscribe at http://www.imc.org/ietf-mxcomp/", william(at)elan.net, 20:17
Re: "If you believe that the SPF concept is fundamentally flawed, please subscribe at http: //www.imc.org/ietf-mxcomp/", John Levine, 19:15
Re: "If you believe that the SPF concept is fundamentally flawed, please subscribe at http://www.imc.org/ietf-mxcomp/", wayne, 18:47
Re: "If you believe that the SPF concept is fundamentally flawed, please subscribe at http://www.imc.org/ietf-mxcomp/", Carl Hutzler, 18:24
Re: "If you believe that the SPF concept is fundamentally flawed, please subscribe at http://www.imc.org/ietf-mxcomp/", Julian Mehnle, 18:03
"If you believe that the SPF concept is fundamentally flawed, please subscribe at http://www.imc.org/ietf-mxcomp/", Douglas Otis, 16:51

May 20, 2005

draft-lyon-senderid-core-01.txt, Douglas Otis, 13:07