On Aug 26, 2005, at 9:15 AM, Stephane Bortzmeyer wrote:
On Fri, Aug 26, 2005 at 08:47:17AM -0400,
Andrew Newton <andy(_at_)hxr(_dot_)us> wrote
a message of 21 lines which said:
If this is the source of the conflict, then BOTH experiments should
not use the v=spf1 records.
It is an absolutely incredible request since SPF uses these records
since its beginning (a long time before Sender-ID existed) and since
there is (unlike SenderID) actual deployment, which can not be called
Is this appeal about avoiding further conflict or is it about
challenging past differences?
Ietf mailing list