ietf-openpgp
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: MUST versus SHOULD in application decisions

1997-10-27 09:23:53
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----

In <slrn659f1r(_dot_)1ha(_dot_)lutz(_at_)taranis(_dot_)iks-jena(_dot_)de>, on 
10/27/97 
   at 04:07 PM, lutz(_at_)taranis(_dot_)iks-jena(_dot_)de (Lutz Donnerhacke) 
said:

* William H. Geiger III wrote:
must not provide to the user. If in the Appendix you wish to put
application recommendations that is fine but the wording as you have it
now is unacceptable.

In this case it should be moved to chapter nine 'Security
Considerations'.

Sounds great!

There is a lot of stuff I could put in there that I would not feel
comfortable putting in the RFC itself. :)

- -- 
- ---------------------------------------------------------------
William H. Geiger III  http://www.amaranth.com/~whgiii
Geiger Consulting    Cooking With Warp 4.0

Author of E-Secure - PGP Front End for MR/2 Ice
PGP & MR/2 the only way for secure e-mail.
OS/2 PGP 2.6.3a at: http://www.amaranth.com/~whgiii/pgpmr2.html                 
       
- ---------------------------------------------------------------

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: 2.6.3a
Charset: cp850
Comment: Registered_User_E-Secure_v1.1b1_ES000000

iQCVAwUBNFS+7o9Co1n+aLhhAQHl5QQAx7apxdI5qtXfbo8O4c0P+9/G08taB+Pa
BGdnxwPkedjzFInwAk5NlGbNRBiuoSB79uhncYNfVrfouuyGsIrudCZ/IGHB3xtA
gp9sNfkmP0nlNcThEShT61QKW/dPKnbGv5GnbuKCPFcQ4BR0kvFk2tWJTVDob5bN
S/iQto1ht2w=
=g9AV
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>