Re: Settling the TIGER question

On Thu, Mar 06, 2003 at 03:56:30PM -0800, Len Sassaman wrote:
> On Thu, 6 Mar 2003, David Shaw wrote:
>
> > If TIGER/192 is removed, perhaps it would be good if HAVAL-5-160 was
> > removed as well, for the same reasons.
> Yes. And double-width SHA as well. Is there a reason for MD2?
I've seen it implemented here and there in OpenPGP libraries.  I doubt
it gets very wide use as neither GnuPG or (so far as I know) PGP
implement it.

David