On Wed, 10 Mar 2004 14:44:04 -0800 Jon Callas <jon(_at_)callas(_dot_)org> wrote:
{that said, many of us are still holding on to our v3 keys,
at least till all the subkey signing issues are resolved ;-) }
Be careful what you ask for, you might get it.
Derek and I went through the issues from Seoul this afternoon, and
that's resolved now. A draft should come out soon -- he's going to
post
some things about the remaining open issues where there's no text.
great!
but what about the difference in subkey production?
will PGP generate/allow addition of subkeys that can sign as well as
encrypt?
it might be necessary if the requirement is for the subkey to sign the
master, and the master to sign the subkey
Does this mean you think I should strip out all V3 keys now? I'd
be
happy to put out an interim draft RSN to just put a nail in V3 keys
as
you suggest. :-)
Jon
(In case it's not clear, I really am joking)
{it is clear ;-) }
but the truth is,
it probably wouldn't matter,
the hardline v3 users don't rely primarily on servers for key exchange
vedaal
Concerned about your privacy? Follow this link to get
FREE encrypted email: https://www.hushmail.com/?l=2
Free, ultra-private instant messaging with Hush Messenger
https://www.hushmail.com/services.php?subloc=messenger&l=434
Promote security and make money with the Hushmail Affiliate Program:
https://www.hushmail.com/about.php?subloc=affiliate&l=427