IETF OpenPGP (date)
May 24, 2009
- Re: Weak crypto [was: Re: how to specify "trust no signatures over hash X from this key"?], Daniel A. Nagy, 20:20
- Re: Financial RSA crack case study: Carte Bleue & PostFinance debit cards [was: how to specify "trust no signatures over hash X from this key"?], Ian G, 17:43
- Re: Weak crypto [was: Re: how to specify "trust no signatures over hash X from this key"?], Ian G, 17:36
- Weak crypto [was: Re: how to specify "trust no signatures over hash X from this key"?], Daniel A. Nagy, 08:24
- Financial RSA crack case study: Carte Bleue & PostFinance debit cards [was: how to specify "trust no signatures over hash X from this key"?], Lionel Elie Mamane, 06:38
May 05, 2009
- Re: I don't think that collides the way you think it does, Daniel A. Nagy, 19:16
- Re: how to specify "trust no signatures over hash X from this key"?, Ian G, 18:41
- Re: Non-SHA-1 fingerprints, Ingo Klöcker, 18:19
- Re: I don't think that collides the way you think it does, Jon Callas, 17:48
- Re: I don't think that collides the way you think it does, Daniel Franke, 15:35
- I don't think that collides the way you think it does, Jon Callas, 14:17
- Re: New results against SHA-1, Jon Callas, 14:16
- Re: Non-SHA-1 fingerprints, "Hal Finney", 13:06
- Re: how to specify "trust no signatures over hash X from this key"?, Daniel Kahn Gillmor, 09:42
- Re: Changing GPG's default key type, Werner Koch, 08:01
- Re: New results against SHA-1, Werner Koch, 03:33
- Re: Fix revocation keys instead of fingerprints?, Werner Koch, 03:20
- Re: how to specify "trust no signatures over hash X from this key"?, Ian G, 03:13
- Re: Changing GPG's default key type, Daniel A. Nagy, 02:41
- Re: decimal fingerprints [was: Re: Non-SHA-1 fingerprints], Daniel A. Nagy, 02:32
- Re: Non-SHA-1 fingerprints, Daniel A. Nagy, 02:31
- Re: Fix revocation keys instead of fingerprints? (was Re: Non-SHA-1 fingerprints), Daniel A. Nagy, 02:30
- how to specify "trust no signatures over hash X from this key"?, Daniel Kahn Gillmor, 00:26
May 04, 2009
- Re: Changing GPG's default key type, Peter Gutmann, 23:22
- Re: New results against SHA-1, Peter Gutmann, 23:05
- Re: Fix revocation keys instead of fingerprints? (was Re: Non-SHA-1 fingerprints), Daniel Kahn Gillmor, 23:05
- Re: Non-SHA-1 fingerprints, Daniel Kahn Gillmor, 23:03
- decimal fingerprints [was: Re: Non-SHA-1 fingerprints], Daniel Kahn Gillmor, 21:40
- Re: Non-SHA-1 fingerprints, David Shaw, 20:33
- Fix revocation keys instead of fingerprints? (was Re: Non-SHA-1 fingerprints), David Shaw, 20:32
- Re: Non-SHA-1 fingerprints, Jon Callas, 19:48
- Re: Changing GPG's default key type, Jon Callas, 19:43
- Re: Non-SHA-1 fingerprints, Ian G, 18:36
- Re: Non-SHA-1 fingerprints, Daniel A. Nagy, 18:34
- Re: New results against SHA-1, Daniel A. Nagy, 18:30
- Re: New results against SHA-1, David Shaw, 18:14
- Non-SHA-1 fingerprints, David Shaw, 17:54
- Re: New results against SHA-1, David Shaw, 16:07
- Re: New results against SHA-1, David Crick, 15:43
- Re: New results against SHA-1, Daniel Kahn Gillmor, 15:41
- Re: New results against SHA-1, Daniel Kahn Gillmor, 15:29
- Re: New results against SHA-1, David Shaw, 15:13
- Re: New results against SHA-1, vedaal, 14:58
- Re: New results against SHA-1, Daniel Kahn Gillmor, 14:38
- Re: Changing GPG's default key type, Christoph Anton Mitterer, 14:29
- Re: Changing GPG's default key type, David Shaw, 14:24
- Re: New results against SHA-1, Werner Koch, 14:05
- Re: Changing GPG's default key type, Christoph Anton Mitterer, 13:45
- Re: Changing GPG's default key type, Ian G, 13:42
- Re: New results against SHA-1, Daniel Kahn Gillmor, 11:50
- Changing GPG's default key type, David Shaw, 11:05