-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA512
Hello!
Phillip Hallam-Baker <phill(_at_)hallambaker(_dot_)com> wrote:
If the generate key from specified seed work goes ahead, we get
this for free.
It is one of the things that made me propose this idea back in
September :-)
You're working with a very flawed definition of the concept
"free". Sure, if all implementations everywhere add the same
fancy feature, we can use that feature for "free" from that point
in time onwards. Well, free aside from maintenance and bugfix
costs... But getting there is expensive and I don't actually see
consensus that we're moving in that direction. I'm not a fan, but
I'll refrain from derailing this thread to pontificate on why.
This approach works right now. It will still work even after
people have started generating from specified seeds. And the cost
is sunk, the work has been done.
It would be a shame if people decided not to collaborate in this
way, because they're waiting for the Next Big Thing to land.
- Bjarni
- https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-bre-openpgp-samples/
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
iQEzBAEBCgAdFiEETBSz4pzXkOHlSFMhjgA3FgDPlJEFAl2pbjMACgkQjgA3FgDP
lJF0Ewf7B9b5imXWTdq4NijB7ROA6DzI1FxftKn0KtzIWbiI/B9t4YeaP1Dp9yJY
o/8CHZeSbXuv6elXtJcK17iU2Xr2RvYBItnlHk47raQvTM19hD5fCKVppchHpsbv
R5Ctiigt51Vu5ffiS+Usk2cRoIBbgq4vpqWo9gi+d2l5gRlQf+QKUeYJId+p1gYq
Qft5rTDR7UrG28b3SLT1Zoe5qjSiwSPia420sY49IRFoBkNjVK29we9B0sbu3o+G
1Ixh0KCfflV4BUtZCDGAi/kNtCD1E4ELpUFUiTDSCihG1gDk/lX2qNlDSjom4Hvj
6yKDYIsagbMrR0EIoA4vqQHYEc0gPg==
=H0Un
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
_______________________________________________
openpgp mailing list
openpgp(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/openpgp