On Thu 2021-03-18 02:33:54 +0100, Ángel wrote:
What about using, instead of the 'long' type, which may mean quite
dfferent things, the uint_least32_t type defined in ISO C 7.18 ?
i'd be fine with either one. afaict, "unsigned long" is always at least
at least a 32-bit unsigned integer, and is more typical idiomatic C, but
if the WG prefers uint_least32_t i would not object. (technically the
CRC-24 accumulator just needs 25 bits -- one to test for overflow -- but
we don't need to cut it so fine :P)
--dkg
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________
openpgp mailing list
openpgp(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/openpgp