I completely agree that it was discussed. (I think I raised the issue.)
And I agree that the content for the message is correct. What needs to
be changed is the commentary not the message.
From: Blake Ramsdell [mailto:blake(_at_)brutesquadlabs(_dot_)com]
Sent: Wednesday, July 16, 2003 10:15 PM
To: jimsch(_at_)exmsft(_dot_)com; 'Ietf-Smime-Examples';
Cc: 'Sean P. Turner'; 'Russ Housley'
Subject: RE: Draft-11Parital Results
From: Jim Schaad [mailto:jimsch(_at_)nwlink(_dot_)com]
Sent: Wednesday, July 16, 2003 7:19 AM
To: Ietf-Smime-Examples; ietf-smime(_at_)imc(_dot_)org;
Cc: Sean P. Turner; Blake Ramsdell; Russ Housley
Subject: Draft-11Parital Results
Commentary text states that the body part is the same
as 5.1 - this
is not correct as the signature values and exContent are different
(content is actually "\0xd\0xaThis is some sample content."
This is something we discussed a bit ago -- the problem is
that ExContent.bin is not valid MIME data. The compromise we
reached was that a CRLF would be inserted at the beginning,
which would make it valid MIME data (implicit text/plain).
When the MIME wrapping is removed, it results in ExContent.bin.