Re: Re Anonymous Final Destination and mail submission
2005-06-26 08:32:30
If you are "final destination" (ie: Are an SMTP Server acting as a MTA
due to being pointed to by a MX) you have to assume that the MTA that is
relaying the message to you for delivery has verified that Mail From so
you HAVE TO assume that it is valid/usable.
This is clearly not the case. If the DNS name in the MAIL FROM address
is invalid you can't send a bounce message to it anyway, so you don't
"HAVE TO" use it. In a world where a significant percentage of mails
received have bogus MAIL FROMs and/or bogus RCPT TO addresses or are
undeliverable for other reasons, checking the DNS name of the MAIL FROM
_before_ you agree to relay mail to a recipient starts to make sense.
<Prev in Thread] |
Current Thread |
[Next in Thread>
|
Re Anonymous Final Destination WAS : request discussion of two documents on SMTP relaying, Willemien
- Re: Re Anonymous Final Destination WAS : request discussion of two documents on SMTP relaying, Hector Santos
- Re: Re: Re Anonymous Final Destination and mail submission, Willemien
- Re: Re: Re Anonymous Final Destination and mail submission, Robert A. Rosenberg
- Re: Re Anonymous Final Destination and mail submission,
Keith Moore <=
- Re: Re Anonymous Final Destination and mail submission, Robert A. Rosenberg
- Re: Re Anonymous Final Destination and mail submission, Keith Moore
- Re: Re Anonymous Final Destination and mail submission, Hector Santos
- Re: Re Anonymous Final Destination and mail submission, Valdis . Kletnieks
- Re: Re Anonymous Final Destination and mail submission, Hector Santos
- Re: Re Anonymous Final Destination and mail submission, Valdis . Kletnieks
Re: Re Anonymous Final Destination and mail submission, Keith Moore
Bounce/System Notification Address Verification, Hector Santos
Re: Bounce/System Notification Address Verification, Valdis . Kletnieks
Re: Bounce/System Notification Address Verification, Hector Santos
|
|
|