Re: Bounce/System Notification Address Verification

On Tue, 28 Jun 2005 11:54:55 EDT, Hector Santos said:

> If you disagree with my comments, opinion, etc,  fine.  Explain, show or
> throw in your own opinions, even say I'm wrong,  but the PERSONAL ATTACKS
> HAS GOT TO STOP!
The closest I can see to a "personal attack" in Keith's note is:

> > Hey, you're the one blocking perfectly legitimate mail using poor
> > criteria,
Keith's expressing a tautology here - if it blocks legitimate mail, it's
a poor criterion by definition.

> >           and meanwhile touting the superiority of your products and
> > expertise as justification for why everyone should do things your way.
Given the number of times you've said "We do it this way, therefore the
rest of you should" with little or no consideration of what circumstances
caused the codifying of standards sections you find inconvenient, I think
he's got you here as well...

> > Maybe if you fixed your mail system to work according to
> > standards rather than your imagination you wouldn't attract such
> > criticism.
This one is borderline.  However, I'd *strongly* recommend not starting any
"defamation and tort legal action" unless you are *really* sure that *nobody*
is able to produce a copy of an RFC-compliant message that was rejected by any
mail system under your control at the time...

(Anybody got one? ;)

pgpvPGNRGxQ6O.pgp
Description: PGP signature