IETF SMTP (date)
January 31, 2007
- Re: greylisting done at end of headers, or end of daya (QUIT) ?, Hector Santos, 18:45
- Re: greylisting done at end of headers, or end of daya (QUIT) ?, Carl S. Gutekunst, 18:04
- Re: greylisting done at end of headers, or end of daya (QUIT) ?, Hector Santos, 17:32
- Re: greylisting done at end of headers, or end of daya (QUIT) ?, Arnt Gulbrandsen, 16:35
- Re: greylisting done at end of headers, or end of daya (QUIT) ?, Carl S. Gutekunst, 16:01
- Re: greylisting done at end of headers, or end of daya (QUIT) ?, Keld Jørn Simonsen, 15:30
- Re: greylisting done at end of headers, or end of daya (QUIT) ?, Peter J. Holzer, 14:40
- Re: greylisting done at end of headers, or end of daya (QUIT) ?, SM, 10:28
January 30, 2007
- Re: draft-hall-deferrals-00.txt, Claus Assmann, 17:32
- Re: greylisting done at end of headers, or end of daya (QUIT) ?, william(at)elan.net, 17:24
- Re: greylisting done at end of headers, or end of daya (QUIT) ?, Carl S. Gutekunst, 17:21
- Re: draft-hall-inline-dsn-01, Tony Finch, 17:14
- Re: greylisting done at end of headers, or end of daya (QUIT) ?, John C Klensin, 15:33
- Re: greylisting done at end of headers, or end of daya (QUIT) ?, John C Klensin, 15:32
- Re: greylisting done at end of headers, or end of daya (QUIT) ?, Hector Santos, 15:29
- Re: greylisting done at end of headers, or end of daya (QUIT) ?, Tony Hansen, 15:25
- Re: greylisting done at end of headers, or end of daya (QUIT) ?, Glenn Anderson, 15:22
- Re: greylisting done at end of headers, or end of daya (QUIT) ?, Valdis . Kletnieks, 15:19
- Re: greylisting done at end of headers, or end of daya (QUIT) ?, SM, 15:06
- Re: Degree of adoption for Enhanced Reply Codes?, Hector Santos, 14:57
- Re: draft-hall-inline-dsn-01, Frank Ellermann, 13:56
- Re: greylisting done at end of headers, or end of daya (QUIT) ?, william(at)elan.net, 13:53
- Re: greylisting done at end of headers, or end of daya (QUIT) ?, SM, 13:43
- Re: greylisting done at end of headers, or end of daya (QUIT) ?, william(at)elan.net, 13:41
- Re: greylisting done at end of headers, or end of daya (QUIT) ?, Keld Jørn Simonsen, 13:40
- Re: greylisting done at end of headers, or end of daya (QUIT) ?, Keld Jørn Simonsen, 13:32
- Re: greylisting done at end of headers, or end of daya (QUIT) ?, John C Klensin, 13:02
- Re: greylisting done at end of headers, or end of daya (QUIT) ?, Tony Hansen, 13:02
- Re: Fwd: I-D ACTION:draft-hall-deferrals-00.txt, Tony Finch, 12:58
- greylisting done at end of headers, or end of daya (QUIT) ?, Keld Jørn Simonsen, 12:33
- Re: Degree of adoption for Enhanced Reply Codes?, Arnt Gulbrandsen, 11:36
- {Blocked Content} [Fwd: I-D ACTION:draft-hall-deferrals-00.txt], Eric A. Hall, 10:56
- Re: Degree of adoption for Enhanced Reply Codes?, Valdis . Kletnieks, 08:51
- Re: Degree of adoption for Enhanced Reply Codes?, Tony Finch, 08:46
- Re: Degree of adoption for Enhanced Reply Codes?, Dave Crocker, 08:35
- Re: Degree of adoption for Enhanced Reply Codes?, Alexey Melnikov, 08:16
January 22, 2007
- Re: Advancing RFC2821 to Draft Standard -- outline of work, Robert A. Rosenberg, 23:54
- Re: Advancing RFC2821 to Draft Standard -- outline of work, Valdis . Kletnieks, 15:27
- Re: Advancing RFC2821 to Draft Standard -- outline of work, Frank Ellermann, 14:44
- [Fwd: Advancing RFC2821 to Draft Standard -- outline of work], Tony Hansen, 13:45
- Advancing RFC2821 to Draft Standard -- outline of work, Lisa Dusseault, 12:59