IETF SMTP (date)
August 15, 2010
- Re: Changing RFC 5322 guidance about crlf.crlf response delay, Hector Santos, 20:22
- Re: Changing RFC 5322 guidance about crlf.crlf response delay, David MacQuigg, 10:44
- Re: per user post-data rejects, Processing after the end of DATA, Hector Santos, 05:35
- Re: per user post-data rejects, Processing after the end of DATA, Carl S. Gutekunst, 03:21
August 14, 2010
- Re: per user post-data rejects, Processing after the end of DATA, Дилян Палаузов, 15:13
- Re: per user post-data rejects, Processing after the end of DATA, David MacQuigg, 14:41
- Re: per user post-data rejects, Processing after the end of DATA, Hector Santos, 09:56
- Re: per user post-data rejects, Processing after the end of DATA, Дилян Палаузов, 09:14
- Re: per user post-data rejects, Processing after the end of DATA, Hector Santos, 09:05
August 13, 2010
- Re: Changing RFC 5322 guidance about crlf.crlf response delay, Alessandro Vesely, 14:35
- Re: NDNs considered harmful, Hector Santos, 13:22
- Re: NDNs considered harmful, Peter J. Holzer, 11:34
- Call Back Verification (was: NDNs considered harmful), Peter J. Holzer, 09:13
- Re: NDNs considered harmful, Hector Santos, 08:59
- Re: per user post-data rejects, Processing after the end of DATA, Tony Finch, 08:36
- Re: NDNs considered harmful, Rich Kulawiec, 07:34
- Re: per user post-data rejects, Processing after the end of DATA, Nathaniel Borenstein, 06:51
- Re: per user post-data rejects, Processing after the end of DATA, Ray Bellis, 03:08
- Re: per user post-data rejects, Processing after the end of DATA, Carl S. Gutekunst, 02:28
- Re: per user post-data rejects, Processing after the end of DATA, Ray Bellis, 01:59
- Re: per user post-data rejects, Processing after the end of DATA, Hector Santos, 00:26
August 12, 2010
- Re: per user post-data rejects, Processing after the end of DATA, Carl S. Gutekunst, 23:53
- Re: per user post-data rejects, Processing after the end of DATA, John Levine, 23:18
- Re: NDNs considered harmful, Hector Santos, 19:53
- Re: per user post-data rejects, Processing after the end of DATA, Carl S. Gutekunst, 19:30
- Re: per user post-data rejects, Processing after the end of DATA, ned+ietf-smtp, 19:10
- Re: per user post-data rejects, Processing after the end of DATA, ned+ietf-smtp, 19:06
- Re: per user post-data rejects, Processing after the end of DATA, Douglas Otis, 18:44
- Re: per user post-data rejects, Processing after the end of DATA, Steve Atkins, 18:42
- Re: per user post-data rejects, Processing after the end of DATA, Carl S. Gutekunst, 18:36
- Re: per user post-data rejects, Processing after the end of DATA, John R Levine, 18:29
- Re: per user post-data rejects, Processing after the end of DATA, Dave CROCKER, 18:12
- RE: Changing RFC 5322 guidance about crlf.crlf response delay, ned+ietf-smtp, 17:53
- Re: per user post-data rejects, Processing after the end of DATA, ned+ietf-smtp, 17:53
- Re: NDNs considered harmful, Rich Kulawiec, 16:38
- Re: NDNs considered harmful, Hector Santos, 13:54
- Re: NDNs considered harmful, Hector Santos, 13:28
- Re: NDNs considered harmful, ned+ietf-smtp, 12:43
- Re: NDNs considered harmful, Paul Smith, 12:43
- Re: NDNs considered harmful, Hector Santos, 12:15
- Re: NDNs considered harmful, Derek J. Balling, 12:11
- Re: Processing after the end of DATA, ned+ietf-smtp, 12:08
- Re: NDNs considered harmful, Paul Smith, 11:48
- Re: NDNs considered harmful, John R Levine, 11:32
- Re: NDNs considered harmful, Paul Smith, 11:30
- Re: NDNs considered harmful, ned+ietf-smtp, 11:08
- Re: Draft to Full, versus cycling at Draft, SM, 10:54
- Re: NDNs considered harmful, Hector Santos, 10:54
- Re: NDNs considered harmful, Hector Santos, 10:31
- Re: NDNs considered harmful, Hector Santos, 10:16
- Re: NDNs considered harmful, Derek J. Balling, 10:15
- RE: NDNs considered harmful, John R Levine, 09:53
- Re: NDNs considered harmful, Paul Smith, 09:32
- RE: NDNs considered harmful, Rosenwald, Jordan, 08:48
- Re: Draft to Full, versus cycling at Draft, John C Klensin, 02:53
August 11, 2010
- Re: mail proxies, Processing after the end of DATA, John Levine, 18:32
- Re: Changing RFC 5322 guidance about crlf.crlf response delay, John Levine, 18:29
- Re: Changing RFC 5322 guidance about crlf.crlf response delay, Hector Santos, 18:24
- Re: Processing after the end of DATA, Tony Finch, 18:00
- Re: Processing after the end of DATA, Hector Santos, 17:48
- RE: Changing RFC 5322 guidance about crlf.crlf response delay, Tony Finch, 17:43
- Re: Processing after the end of DATA, Steve Atkins, 17:39
- Re: Changing RFC 5322 guidance about crlf.crlf response delay, Tony Finch, 17:32
- Re: Processing after the end of DATA, Tony Finch, 17:16
- Re: NDNs considered harmful, John Levine, 17:03
- Re: per user post-data rejects, Processing after the end of DATA, John Levine, 17:01
- Re: Changing RFC 5322 guidance about crlf.crlf response delay, Jeff Macdonald, 16:58
- Re: Processing after the end of DATA, Tony Finch, 16:58
- Re: Processing after the end of DATA, Hector Santos, 16:40
- Re: Changing RFC 5322 guidance about crlf.crlf response delay, Steve Atkins, 16:39
- Re: Draft to Full, versus cycling at Draft, Jeff Macdonald, 16:25
- Re: Changing RFC 5322 guidance about crlf.crlf response delay, Jeff Macdonald, 16:24
- Re: Processing after the end of DATA, ned+ietf-smtp, 15:44
- Re: Draft to Full, versus cycling at Draft, SM, 15:16
- Re: Processing after the end of DATA, David MacQuigg, 14:50
- Re: Draft to Full, versus cycling at Draft, Hector Santos, 14:49
- Re: Changing RFC 5322 guidance about crlf.crlf response delay, Hector Santos, 14:47
- Re: Draft to Full, versus cycling at Draft, Tony Hansen, 14:06
- Re: Changing RFC 5322 guidance about crlf.crlf response delay, Steve Atkins, 13:57
- Re: Changing RFC 5322 guidance about crlf.crlf response delay, John C Klensin, 13:57
- RE: Changing RFC 5322 guidance about crlf.crlf response delay, John C Klensin, 13:45
- Re: Changing RFC 5322 guidance about crlf.crlf response delay, Dave CROCKER, 13:32
- Re: Draft to Full, versus cycling at Draft, John C Klensin, 13:28
- Re: Changing RFC 5322 guidance about crlf.crlf response delay, Steve Atkins, 12:41
- RE: Changing RFC 5322 guidance about crlf.crlf response delay, ned+ietf-smtp, 12:40
- Re: Changing RFC 5322 guidance about crlf.crlf response delay, Dave CROCKER, 12:36
- Re: Processing after the end of DATA, SM, 12:26
- Re: Processing after the end of DATA, Дилян Палаузов, 12:25
- Re: Changing RFC 5322 guidance about crlf.crlf response delay, SM, 12:24
- RE: Changing RFC 5322 guidance about crlf.crlf response delay, Murray S. Kucherawy, 12:07
- Draft to Full, versus cycling at Draft, Dave CROCKER, 12:01
- Re: Changing RFC 5322 guidance about crlf.crlf response delay, Tony Hansen, 11:38
- Re: Processing after the end of DATA, Dave CROCKER, 11:03
- Re: Processing after the end of DATA, Dave CROCKER, 10:54
- RE: Processing after the end of DATA, ned+ietf-smtp, 10:48
- Re: Processing after the end of DATA, Arnt Gulbrandsen, 10:48
- Re: Processing after the end of DATA, Dave CROCKER, 10:38
- Re: Processing after the end of DATA, Paul Smith, 10:35
- Re: Changing RFC 5322 guidance about crlf.crlf response delay, John C Klensin, 10:31
- Re: Processing after the end of DATA, Arnt Gulbrandsen, 10:31
- Re: Changing RFC 5322 guidance about crlf.crlf response delay, John C Klensin, 10:30
- Re: Changing RFC 5322 guidance about crlf.crlf response delay, Steve Atkins, 10:19
- Re: Changing RFC 5322 guidance about crlf.crlf response delay, Hector Santos, 10:07
- Re: Processing after the end of DATA, Hector Santos, 09:51
- Re: Processing after the end of DATA, Hector Santos, 09:27
- Changing RFC 5322 guidance about crlf.crlf response delay, Dave CROCKER, 09:22
- Re: Processing after the end of DATA, Dave CROCKER, 09:04
- Re: Processing after the end of DATA, Arnt Gulbrandsen, 08:02
- Re: Processing after the end of DATA, Tony Finch, 07:59
- Re: Processing after the end of DATA, John C Klensin, 07:00
- Re: Processing after the end of DATA, Arnt Gulbrandsen, 06:42
- Re: Processing after the end of DATA, Arnt Gulbrandsen, 06:35
- Re: Processing after the end of DATA, Tony Finch, 06:08
August 10, 2010
- Re: Processing after the end of DATA, David MacQuigg, 21:49
- Re: Processing after the end of DATA, John C Klensin, 20:03
- Re: Processing after the end of DATA, John Levine, 18:08
- Re: Processing after the end of DATA, Robert A. Rosenberg, 16:16
- Re: Processing after the end of DATA, J.D. Falk, 15:36
- Re: Processing after the end of DATA, David MacQuigg, 13:38
- Re: Processing after the end of DATA, Dave CROCKER, 12:07
- Re: Processing after the end of DATA, Carl S. Gutekunst, 12:03
- Re: Processing after the end of DATA, Tony Finch, 11:48
- Re: Processing after the end of DATA, David MacQuigg, 11:40
- RE: Processing after the end of DATA, Rosenwald, Jordan, 10:23
- Re: Processing after the end of DATA, Nathaniel Borenstein, 07:23
- Re: Processing after the end of DATA, SM, 02:45
- Re: Processing after the end of DATA, Carl S. Gutekunst, 00:56
- Re: Processing after the end of DATA, Carl S. Gutekunst, 00:55
- Re: Processing after the end of DATA, Carl S. Gutekunst, 00:47
- Re: Processing after the end of DATA, Hector Santos, 00:32
August 09, 2010
- Re: Processing after the end of DATA, Hector Santos, 23:18
- Re: Processing after the end of DATA, ned+ietf-smtp, 22:58
- Re: Processing after the end of DATA, Hector Santos, 22:39
- Re: Processing after the end of DATA, Tony Hansen, 22:31
- Re: Processing after the end of DATA, ned+ietf-smtp, 22:30
- Re: Processing after the end of DATA, Hector Santos, 22:10
- Re: Processing after the end of DATA, Dave CROCKER, 20:52
- Re: Processing after the end of DATA, John Levine, 20:33
- Re: Processing after the end of DATA, John C Klensin, 20:27
- Re: Processing after the end of DATA, Carl S. Gutekunst, 20:11
- Re: Processing after the end of DATA, Dave CROCKER, 19:54
- Re: Processing after the end of DATA, Tony Hansen, 19:52
- Re: Processing after the end of DATA, Dave CROCKER, 19:44
- Re: Processing after the end of DATA, Steve Atkins, 19:39
- Processing after the end of DATA, Dave CROCKER, 19:28