IETF Discussion (date)
August 31, 2000
- Re: Standard Track dependencies on Informational RFCs, Kurt D. Zeilenga, 20:10
- RE: Standard Track dependencies on Informational RFCs, Christian Huitema, 20:00
- FAQ: The IETF+Censored list, Harald Tveit Alvestrand, 18:50
- MPLS question, HUGO ZAMORA LOPEZ, 18:30
- Re: Standard Track dependencies on Informational RFCs, Scott Bradner, 17:50
- Re: Standard Track dependencies on Informational RFCs, RJ Atkinson, 08:10
- Re: Standard Track dependencies on Informational RFCs, John Stracke, 07:20
- Re: Standard Track dependencies on Informational RFCs, Brian E Carpenter, 07:00
- RE: Standard Track dependencies on Informational RFCs, Graham Klyne, 02:50
August 30, 2000
- RE: Standard Track dependencies on Informational RFCs, Harald Alvestrand, 23:10
- Re: Standard Track dependencies on Informational RFCs, Keith Moore, 18:20
- Re: Standard Track dependencies on Informational RFCs, Kurt D. Zeilenga, 17:50
- RE: Standard Track dependencies on Informational RFCs, Scott Bradner, 17:40
- RE: Standard Track dependencies on Informational RFCs, Christian Huitema, 17:20
- Re: Standard Track dependencies on Informational RFCs, Scott Bradner, 15:40
- Re: Standard Track dependencies on Informational RFCs, Brian E Carpenter, 14:50
- Re: Standard Track dependencies on Informational RFCs, RJ Atkinson, 13:50
- Standard Track dependencies on Informational RFCs, Kurt D. Zeilenga, 12:20
August 29, 2000
- Re: Hi, this is for you!, Yu Jianhua, 18:00
- Re: Helping the research community, Marc Horowitz, 16:50
- Re: Helping the research community, Lixia Zhang, 15:40
- Helping the research community, Beni Arazi, 14:40
- Re: VPN Device, RL 'Bob' Morgan, 11:50
- Re: Active networks, Valdis . Kletnieks, 11:10
- Re: Active networks, Sivashankaran R, 08:50
August 26, 2000
- Re: Active networks, Angelos D. Keromytis, 23:10
- Re: Active networks, Angelos D. Keromytis, 23:00
- Re: Active networks, John Stracke, 22:50
- RE: Active networks, Rakers, Jason, 20:30
- Active networks, Ayman Malek Kaheel, 13:10
- Re: msc drawing tool, Anthony Atkielski, 12:30
- msc drawing tool, tom worster, 12:00
- Lookgolf羅開高爾夫電子報0827, service, 10:10
August 25, 2000
- Re: *implement* the drafts (was: getting IPv6 space without ARIN), Masataka Ohta, 18:50
- Re: *implement* the drafts (was: getting IPv6 space without ARIN), April Marine, 09:30
- Re: *implement* the drafts (was: getting IPv6 space without ARIN), Masataka Ohta, 09:00
- Re: *implement* the drafts (was: getting IPv6 space without ARIN), Maurizio Codogno, 08:20
- Re: getting IPv6 space without ARIN (Re: PAT ), Masataka Ohta, 07:40
- Re: getting IPv6 space without ARIN (Re: PAT ), Keith Moore, 06:30
- Re: getting IPv6 space without ARIN (Re: PAT ), Masataka Ohta, 06:00
- Re: getting IPv6 space without ARIN (Re: PAT ), Keith Moore, 05:30
- Re: getting IPv6 space without ARIN (Re: PAT ), Keith Moore, 05:20
- Re: getting IPv6 space without ARIN (Re: PAT ), Masataka Ohta, 02:00
- Re: getting IPv6 space without ARIN (Re: PAT ), Jon Crowcroft, 00:50
August 24, 2000
- Re: getting IPv6 space without ARIN (Re: PAT ), Masataka Ohta, 23:30
- Re: Deployment vs the IPv6 community's ambivalence towards large providerss, Masataka Ohta, 19:20
- Re: Deployment vs the IPv6 community's ambivalence towards large providerss, Masataka Ohta, 18:30
- Re: Deployment vs the IPv6 community's ambivalence towards large providers, Brian E Carpenter, 12:50
- Re: IPv6 Traffic class field or DS field ??, Fred Baker, 10:10
- Re: IPv6 Traffic class field or DS field ??, John Stracke, 07:40
- ABR to the Internet pre-BOF collaboration / discussion, Michael Welzl, 06:50
- Re: getting IPv6 space without ARIN (Re: PAT ), Hakikur Rahman, 03:10
August 23, 2000
- RE: Last Call: ICMP Extensions for MultiProtocol Label Switching toProposed Standard, Ron Bonica, 21:10
- Re: Deployment vs the IPv6 community's ambivalence towards large providers, Masataka Ohta, 18:50
- Re: Deployment vs the IPv6 community's ambivalence towards large providerss, Masataka Ohta, 18:30
- Re: Regarding SNMP, Mohammed Rizwan Shaikh, 10:20
- Re: getting IPv6 space without ARIN (Re: PAT ), narakamath, 08:50
- Re: Deployment vs the IPv6 community's ambivalence towards large providers, RJ Atkinson, 08:10
- Re: getting IPv6 space without ARIN (Re: PAT ), Bob Hinden, 07:40
- Re: Deployment vs the IPv6 community's ambivalence towards large providers, Thomas Narten, 07:30
- Re: Deployment vs the IPv6 community's ambivalence towards large providers, Rahul Banerjee, 06:40
- IPv6 Traffic class field or DS field ??, Nikki Cranley, 05:20
- Re: getting IPv6 space without ARIN (Re: PAT ), Thomas Narten, 04:40
- Re: Deployment vs the IPv6 community's ambivalence towards large providers, Thomas Narten, 04:20
August 22, 2000
- Re: Deployment vs the IPv6 community's ambivalence towards large providers, Valdis . Kletnieks, 20:20
- Re: Deployment vs the IPv6 community's ambivalence towards large providers, vinton g. cerf, 20:10
- Re: Deployment vs the IPv6 community's ambivalence towards large providers, Brian E Carpenter, 19:50
- Re: IPv6 Migration (and back...), Kent Crispin, 16:20
- Re: Deployment vs the IPv6 community's ambivalence towards large providers, Vernon Schryver, 13:40
- IPv6 Migration (and back...), Tim Salo, 13:20
- Re: Deployment vs the IPv6 community's ambivalence towards large providers, Brian E Carpenter, 12:40
- Re: getting IPv6 space without ARIN (Re: PAT ), Tim Salo, 09:10
- Re: Deployment vs the IPv6 community's ambivalence towards large providers, Vernon Schryver, 08:30
- Re: Deployment vs the IPv6 community's ambivalence towards large providers, Robert Elz, 07:20
- Re: Deployment vs the IPv6 community's ambivalence towards large providers, Vernon Schryver, 06:50
- Re: Regarding SNMP, Bob Natale, 05:30
- Regarding SNMP, Ajay Sakpal, 03:40
- Pet Tag Program For shelters and Rescue groups., max sutter, 00:40
- Re: Deployment vs the IPv6 community's ambivalence towards large providers, Robert Elz, 00:30
August 18, 2000
- RE: getting IPv6 space without ARIN (Re: PAT ), Brumpton Richard Jr. Contr 76 LG/LGSMPS, 13:30
- Re: getting IPv6 space without ARIN (Re: PAT ), Keith Moore, 13:00
- Re: getting IPv6 space without ARIN (Re: PAT ), Paul Francis, 12:50
- Re: getting IPv6 space without ARIN (Re: PAT ), Keith Moore, 11:50
- Proactive security and adaptability, Salavat R. Magazov, 11:20
- Re: Deployment vs the IPv6 community's ambivalence towards large providers, Vijay Gill, 10:20
- Re: getting IPv6 space without ARIN (Re: PAT ), Michael Richardson, 10:00
- Re: getting IPv6 space without ARIN (Re: PAT ), Brian E Carpenter, 08:20
- Re: getting IPv6 space without ARIN (Re: PAT ), Brian E Carpenter, 08:10
- Re: getting IPv6 space without ARIN (Re: PAT ), Brian E Carpenter, 07:50
August 17, 2000
- VS: Control by consent (Was Re: Any surprize at all?, Erkki Kolehmainen, 23:40
- Re: Deployment vs the IPv6 community's ambivalence towards large providers, Robert Elz, 22:40
- Re: getting IPv6 space without ARIN (Re: PAT ), J. Noel Chiappa, 20:50
- Re: getting IPv6 space without ARIN (Re: PAT ), David R. Conrad, 18:30
- Re: Deployment vs the IPv6 community's ambivalence towards large providers, Sean Doran, 18:10
- Re: getting IPv6 space without ARIN (Re: PAT ), Stephen Sprunk, 17:50
- Re: Deployment vs the IPv6 community's ambivalence towards large providers, Matt Crawford, 17:30
- Re: Deployment vs the IPv6 community's ambivalence towards large providers, Brian E Carpenter, 17:10
- Re: getting IPv6 space without ARIN (Re: PAT ), David R. Conrad, 16:20
- Re: getting IPv6 space without ARIN (Re: PAT ), Sean Doran, 15:30
- Re: getting IPv6 space without ARIN (Re: PAT ), Valdis . Kletnieks, 15:20
- Re: getting IPv6 space without ARIN (Re: PAT ), David R. Conrad, 15:00
- Re: getting IPv6 space without ARIN (Re: PAT ), Brian E Carpenter, 14:20
- Deployment vs the IPv6 community's ambivalence towards large providers, Sean Doran, 14:10
- Re: getting IPv6 space without ARIN (Re: PAT ), Matt Crawford, 14:00
- Re: getting IPv6 space without ARIN (Re: PAT ), Daniel Senie, 13:50
- Re: getting IPv6 space without ARIN (Re: PAT ), David R. Conrad, 13:20
- Re: getting IPv6 space without ARIN (Re: PAT ), Thomas Narten, 13:10
- Re: [Fwd: Re: getting IPv6 space without ARIN (Re: PAT )], David R. Conrad, 12:50
- Re: getting IPv6 space without ARIN (Re: PAT ), Bertrand . Ibrahim, 12:20
- IPv6 local experiment draft, itojun, 11:50
- Re: getting IPv6 space without ARIN (Re: PAT ), Sean Doran, 11:20
- Re: getting IPv6 space without ARIN (Re: PAT ), Sean Doran, 11:10
- Re: Control by consent (Was Re: Any surprize at all?, Maurizio Codogno, 11:00
- Re: getting IPv6 space without ARIN (Re: PAT ), Matt Crawford, 10:30
- Re: getting IPv6 space without ARIN (Re: PAT ), itojun, 10:20
- Re: getting IPv6 space without ARIN (Re: PAT ), Daniel Senie, 09:50
- Re: [Fwd: Re: getting IPv6 space without ARIN (Re: PAT )], Matt Crawford, 09:40
- Re: getting IPv6 space without ARIN (Re: PAT ), Sean Doran, 09:10
- Re: getting IPv6 space without ARIN (Re: PAT ), Brian E Carpenter, 06:40
August 16, 2000
- Any Multicast capable ISPs ?, Lee, Jiwoong, 23:50
- Re: getting IPv6 space without ARIN (Re: PAT ), David R. Conrad, 16:40
- getting IPv6 space without ARIN (Re: PAT ), Michael Richardson, 15:50
- PAT, Peter Burggasser, 15:30
- Re: PAT, David R. Conrad, 14:20
- on the cost of IPv6 addresses, Keith Moore, 13:40
- Re: PAT, Michael Richardson, 13:20
- Re: PAT, Keith Moore, 12:10
- Re: PAT, Michael Richardson, 11:00
- Re: more on IPv6 address space exhaustion, Frank Solensky, 08:30
- Re: PAT, Keith Moore, 08:20
- RE: PAT, Brian . Rubarts, 07:00
August 15, 2000
- Re: more on IPv6 address space exhaustion, Theodore Y. Ts'o, 19:50
- Improving HTTP/DAV status reporting, Jim Whitehead, 18:00
- Re: PAT, Keith Moore, 14:30
- RE: PAT, Lillian Komlossy, 13:50
- Re: PAT, Jasen G. Strutt, 13:40
- RE: PAT, Leonard W. Miller, 13:20
- Re: PAT, Randall . Gale, 13:00
- Re: more on IPv6 address space exhaustion, Anthony Atkielski, 12:30
- PAT, Peter Burggasser, 12:10
- Re: more on IPv6 address space exhaustion, Keith Moore, 11:20
- Re: more on IPv6 address space exhaustion, Sean Doran, 11:10
- Re: more on IPv6 address space exhaustion, Keith Moore, 10:40
- Re: more on IPv6 address space exhaustion, Sean Doran, 10:30
- Re: more on IPv6 address space exhaustion, Keith Moore, 10:10
- Re: more on IPv6 address space exhaustion, Sean Doran, 09:50
- Conformance Testing of MGCP, SIP etc, Yixin Zhu, 09:00
- Re: more on IPv6 address space exhaustion, Tim Salo, 08:50
- Re: more on IPv6 address space exhaustion, Sean Doran, 08:10
- Re: more on IPv6 address space exhaustion, Thomas Narten, 08:00
- Re: more on IPv6 address space exhaustion, Anthony Atkielski, 02:30
August 14, 2000
- Re: NAT, v6, etc., Masataka Ohta, 23:40
- Re: more on IPv6 address space exhaustion, James Corning, 19:50
- Re: NAT, v6, etc., Sean Doran, 17:30
- NAT, v6, etc., Perry E. Metzger, 17:20
- Re: more on IPv6 address space exhaustion, Greg Skinner, 16:50
- Re: more on IPv6 address space exhaustion, Vernon Schryver, 15:50
- Re: more on IPv6 address space exhaustion, Sean Doran, 15:10
- Re: more on IPv6 address space exhaustion, Brian E Carpenter, 15:00
- Re: more on IPv6 address space exhaustion, Sean Doran, 14:50
- Re: more on IPv6 address space exhaustion, Sean Doran, 14:40
- Re: more on IPv6 address space exhaustion, James Corning, 14:30
- Re: more on IPv6 address space exhaustion, Andy Fletcher, 13:40
- Re: more on IPv6 address space exhaustion, Mike Truskowski, 12:40
- Re: more on IPv6 address space exhaustion, John Day, 12:10
- SIP for Networked Appliances, Stan Moyer, 11:50
- Re: more on IPv6 address space exhaustion, Valdis . Kletnieks, 11:40
- Re: more on IPv6 address space exhaustion, Brian E Carpenter, 11:30
- Re: more on IPv6 address space exhaustion, Sean Doran, 10:40
- Re: more on IPv6 address space exhaustion, Brian E Carpenter, 09:40
- Re: more on IPv6 address space exhaustion, Greg Skinner, 09:00
- Re: Control by consent (Was Re: Any surprize at all?, J . Loenne, 08:20
- Re: more on IPv6 address space exhaustion, Brian E Carpenter, 07:40
August 12, 2000
- Re: Sequentially assigned IP addresses--why not?, Anthony Atkielski, 19:20
- Re: Sequentially assigned IP addresses--why not?, Bill Manning, 18:40
- Re: Sequentially assigned IP addresses--why not?, Anthony Atkielski, 17:30
- Re: Control by consent (Was Re: Any surprize at all?, Anthony Atkielski, 17:20
- RE: Sequentially assigned IP addresses--why not?, Philip J. Nesser II, 17:00
- Re: Sequentially assigned IP addresses--why not?, Anthony Atkielski, 16:50
- Re: Sequentially assigned IP addresses--why not?, Anthony Atkielski, 16:40
- Re: Sequentially assigned IP addresses--why not?, Anthony Atkielski, 16:30
- Re: Control by consent (Was Re: Any surprize at all?, vinton g. cerf, 15:00
- Re: more on IPv6 address space exhaustion, Eric Brunner, 12:30
- Control by consent (Was Re: Any surprize at all?, Andy Fletcher, 11:00
- Re: more on IPv6 address space exhaustion, R. A. Hettinga, 08:30
- Any surprize at all? (was Re: more on IPv6 address space exhaustion), R. A. Hettinga, 08:20
- Re: more on IPv6 address space exhaustion, Bill Manning, 08:10
- Re: Sequentially assigned IP addresses--why not?, John Day, 07:00
- Re: more on IPv6 address space exhaustion, Matt Crawford, 06:50
- Re: Sequentially assigned IP addresses--why not?, Mike Bresina, 06:00
- Re: Sequentially assigned IP addresses--why not?, Henning Schulzrinne, 05:50
- Re: Sequentially assigned IP addresses--why not?, Måns Nilsson, 05:40
- Re: Sequentially assigned IP addresses--why not?, Loa Andersson, 04:50
- Re: Sequentially assigned IP addresses--why not?, Anthony Atkielski, 03:50
- Re: more on IPv6 address space exhaustion, J. Noel Chiappa, 00:50
- RE: Sequentially assigned IP addresses--why not?, Philip J. Nesser II, 00:40
- Re: more on IPv6 address space exhaustion, Anthony Atkielski, 00:30
- Re: more on IPv6 address space exhaustion, Fred Baker, 00:20
August 11, 2000
- Re: more on IPv6 address space exhaustion, Rick H Wesson, 23:20
- Re: more on IPv6 address space exhaustion, Anthony Atkielski, 23:00
- Re: Sequentially assigned IP addresses--why not?, Donald E. Eastlake 3rd, 22:50
- Re: Sequentially assigned IP addresses--why not?, Anthony Atkielski, 22:40
- Re: more on IPv6 address space exhaustion, J. Noel Chiappa, 22:20
- Re: more on IPv6 address space exhaustion, Sean Doran, 21:40
- Re: more on IPv6 address space exhaustion, Fred Baker, 20:50
- Re: more on IPv6 address space exhaustion, vinton g. cerf, 20:40
- Re: more on IPv6 address space exhaustion, Greg Skinner, 20:30
- Re: more on IPv6 address space exhaustion, vinton g. cerf, 20:00
- Re: Sequentially assigned IP addresses--why not?, Bill Manning, 19:50
- Re: Sequentially assigned IP addresses--why not?, Steven M. Bellovin, 18:40
- Re: end-to-end w/i-Mode? (was Re: imode far superior to wap), Randall R. Stewart, 18:10
- Re: Sequentially assigned IP addresses--why not?, Matt Crawford, 18:00
- Re: Sequentially assigned IP addresses--why not?, Brian E Carpenter, 17:50
- more on IPv6 address space exhaustion, Greg Skinner, 17:20
- Re: imode far superior to wap, James P. Salsman, 17:00
- Re: Sequentially assigned IP addresses--why not?, Geoff Huston, 16:40
- Re: Sequentially assigned IP addresses--why not?, John Day, 16:30
- Re: Sequentially assigned IP addresses--why not?, Brian E Carpenter, 16:10
- Re: Sequentially assigned IP addresses--why not?, Matt Crawford, 15:30
- Re: Sequentially assigned IP addresses--why not?, Salavat R. Magazov, 14:50
- Re: Sequentially assigned IP addresses--why not?, Salavat R. Magazov, 14:40
- Re: Sequentially assigned IP addresses--why not?, Anthony Atkielski, 14:20
- RE: end-to-end w/i-Mode? (was Re: imode far superior to wap), J. Noel Chiappa, 14:10
- RE: end-to-end w/i-Mode? (was Re: imode far superior to wap), Jeffrey Altman, 13:50
- Re: Sequentially assigned IP addresses--why not?, Sean Doran, 13:30
- RE: end-to-end w/i-Mode? (was Re: imode far superior to wap), Briancon Alain-FAB005, 12:50
- Re: non-engineers, Valdis . Kletnieks, 12:40
- Re: Sequentially assigned IP addresses--why not?, Sean Doran, 11:40
- Re: imode far superior to wap, John Stracke, 11:20
- Re: Sequentially assigned IP addresses--why not?, Fred Baker, 11:00
- RE: end-to-end w/i-Mode? (was Re: imode far superior to wap), Brijesh Kumar, 10:40
- Re: Sequentially assigned IP addresses--why not?, Masataka Ohta, 10:20
- Re: Sequentially assigned IP addresses--why not?, John Day, 10:10
- RE: end-to-end w/i-Mode? (was Re: imode far superior to wap), John Day, 10:00
- Re: non-engineers, Valdis . Kletnieks, 09:50
- Re: non-engineers, Randall R. Stewart, 09:40
- Re: Sequentially assigned IP addresses--why not?, Brian E Carpenter, 09:20
- Re: Sequentially assigned IP addresses--why not?, Sean Doran, 08:50
- Re: Sequentially assigned IP addresses--why not?, John Kristoff, 08:20
- Re: Sequentially assigned IP addresses--why not?, Brian E Carpenter, 08:00
- Re: Sequentially assigned IP addresses--why not?, Brian E Carpenter, 07:50
- Re: Sequentially assigned IP addresses--why not?, Brian E Carpenter, 07:40
- non-engineers, Vernon Schryver, 07:20
- rpc, Adrian Mangeac, 06:10
- RE: Sequentially assigned IP addresses--why not?, Steven Cotton, 05:50
- RF Modulation Standards, Manohar Menon, 05:20
- RE: Sequentially assigned IP addresses--why not?, Rakers, Jason, 05:00
- Re: end-to-end w/i-Mode? (was Re: imode far superior to wap), Masataka Ohta, 00:40
- Re: imode far superior to wap, Masataka Ohta, 00:10
August 10, 2000
- Re: Sequentially assigned IP addresses--why not?, Vijay Gill, 23:20
- RE: imode far superior to wap, vinton g. cerf, 23:00
- RE: end-to-end w/i-Mode? (was Re: imode far superior to wap), ned . freed, 22:40
- Re: Sequentially assigned IP addresses--why not?, Anthony Atkielski, 22:30
- Re: Sequentially assigned IP addresses--why not?, Keith Moore, 22:20
- Re: Sequentially assigned IP addresses--why not?, Anthony Atkielski, 20:10
- Re: Sequentially assigned IP addresses--why not?, Anthony Atkielski, 20:00
- Re: Home Improvements / Politically Connect, Fred Baker, 19:10
- Re: Sequentially assigned IP addresses--why not?, Fred Baker, 19:00
- Re: Home Improvements / Politically Connect, Fred Baker, 18:50
- Re: Sequentially assigned IP addresses--why not?, Steven M. Bellovin, 18:20
- Re: imode far superior to wap, James P. Salsman, 18:00
- RE: Sequentially assigned IP addresses--why not?, Corzine, Gordie, 17:40
- Re: Sequentially assigned IP addresses--why not?, Steven M. Bellovin, 17:00
- RE: end-to-end w/i-Mode? (was Re: imode far superior to wap), Brijesh Kumar, 16:50
- Re: Sequentially assigned IP addresses--why not?, Brian E Carpenter, 16:40
- Re: Sequentially assigned IP addresses--why not?, Valdis . Kletnieks, 16:20
- Supersleuth Tells All, Make 10K A Month, w5nd7c1zb, 14:50
- Sequentially assigned IP addresses--why not?, Corzine, Gordie, 13:10
- Supersleuth Tells All, Make 10K A Month, qzlR90tKn, 12:50
- Re: imode far superior to wap, Måns Nilsson, 12:00
- Re: end-to-end w/i-Mode? (was Re: imode far superior to wap), John Day, 11:30
- Re: imode far superior to wap, Masataka Ohta, 11:20
- Re: imode far superior to wap, Masataka Ohta, 11:10
- Re: imode far superior to wap, Masataka Ohta, 10:20
- RE: imode far superior to wap, Steven Cotton, 10:00
- Netscape Netcenter Unsubscribe, <Netscape, 09:10
- Re: imode far superior to wap, Francis Dupont, 08:50
- Netscape Netcenter Unsubscribe, <Netscape, 08:30
- Netscape Netcenter Unsubscribe, <Netscape, 08:20
- Netscape Netcenter Unsubscribe, <Netscape, 08:10
- RE: imode far superior to wap, Barathy, RamaSubramaniam, 07:40
- RE: Netscape Netcenter Unsubscribe, Dawson, Peter D, 07:30
- Re: imode far superior to wap, John Stracke, 06:20
- Netscape Netcenter Unsubscribe, <Netscape, 06:00
- Netscape Netcenter Unsubscribe, <Netscape, 05:40
- Netscape Netcenter Unsubscribe, <Netscape, 05:30
- Netscape Netcenter Unsubscribe, <Netscape, 05:00
- Re: imode far superior to wap, Steven Cotton, 04:50
- Netscape Netcenter Unsubscribe, <Netscape, 04:40
- Netscape Netcenter Unsubscribe, <Netscape, 04:30
- Re: imode far superior to wap, Renfield Kuroda, 03:50
- Re: imode far superior to wap, James Seng, 03:40
- Home Improvements / Politically Connect, Netscape, 03:21
August 09, 2000
- Re: imode far superior to wap, George Michaelson, 17:00
- end-to-end w/i-Mode? (was Re: imode far superior to wap), James P. Salsman, 14:10
- RE: ferul/farrell postings, Dawson, Peter D, 12:20
- RE: imode far superior to wap, John Day, 12:00
- RE: ferul/farrell postings, Tony Hain, 11:30
- RE: imode far superior to wap, Brijesh Kumar, 09:40
- Re: imode far superior to wap, Dave Crocker, 09:30
- RE: imode far superior to wap, Shaw, Robert, 09:20
- Re: imode far superior to wap, Valdis . Kletnieks, 09:10
- Re: imode far superior to wap, Måns Nilsson, 08:40
- imode far superior to wap, James P. Salsman, 06:50
- Seeking information, Philip J. Nesser II, 05:20
August 07, 2000
- Re: [OT] Valley of the Boyz, Fred Baker, 21:23
- Re: [OT] Valley of the Boyz, Randall . Gale, 11:40
- Re: Valley of the Boyz & (IBM browser ad!), kysi ferul, 11:10
- Re: [OT] Valley of the Boyz, kysi ferul, 11:00
- RE: pay for using MPEG-4 standard, Chiariglione Leonardo, 10:00
- Re: pay for using MPEG-4 standard, Colin Perkins, 09:10
- RE: pay for using MPEG-4 standard, Goel, Jiten, 08:40
- Re: pay for using MPEG-4 standard, Colin Perkins, 08:10
- pay for using MPEG-4 standard, Jitendra Goel, 07:40
- IETFers on break. Was: Re: Heard at the IETF, Robert Moskowitz, 07:30
- Re: [IETF48] IPv6 shutdown time will be 11:30, Matt Crawford, 06:50
- Re: Please Call the FBI and other gibberish, Robert G. Ferrell, 06:20
- ferul/farrell postings, William Allen Simpson, 05:20
- About not listening to "Kysi Ferrul", Harald Tveit Alvestrand, 05:10
- UDP Echo and DiffServ bits, Glen Turner, 01:10
August 06, 2000
- Compleet Scholar (Theory of Code & Encryption ), kysi ferul, 19:50
- Compleet Scholar (Theory of Code & Encryption ), kysi ferul, 19:40
- Apologies for the Last Post, Jon William Toigo, 15:40
- Cabling Question, Jon William Toigo, 15:10
- Re: Please Call the FBI, Red Chinese Spiy Enclave in SF CA!, Beatrice Dominguez-Meiers, 09:50
- All this pro-american nazi crap (was Re: [Fwd: Your 'schools' ....are certainly 'for-the-birds!']), Fyodor, 08:40
- Re: [Fwd: Your 'schools' ....are certainly 'for-the-birds!'], a. herrera, 06:10
- Re: Please Call the FBI, Red Chinese Spiy Enclave in SF CA!, Alan Simpkins, 05:32
- Re: Please Call the FBI, Red Chinese Spiy Enclave in SF CA!, kysi ferul, 00:38
- Please Call the FBI, Red Chinese Spiy Enclave in SF CA!, kysi ferul, 00:20
August 05, 2000
- Please Call the FBI, Red Chinese Spiy Enclave in SF CA!, kysi ferul, 23:50
- Please Call the FBI, Red Chinese Spiy Enclave in SF CA!, kysi ferul, 23:41
- Please Call the FBI, Red Chinese Spiy Enclave in SF CA!, kysi ferul, 23:22
- Your 'schools' ....are certainly 'for-the-birds!', kysi ferul, 19:20
- Re: Addresses and ports and taxes -- oh my!, Dennis Glatting, 16:00
- Re: California electric power on the ragged edge, kysi ferul, 14:50
- Re: Stop the PROLIFERATION of 'spam' DOT-COMS!, kysi ferul, 14:20
- Re: Stop the PROLIFERATION of 'spam' DOT-COMS!, kysi ferul, 14:10
- Stop the PROLIFERATION of 'spam' DOT-COMS!, kysi ferul, 14:00
- Re: Address allocation revisited, John Day, 13:20
- Re: Non-USA countries and improvement in networks?, Some One, 12:00
- Re: Non-USA countries and improvement in networks?, Randy Bush, 11:00
- Found: a vaio ethernet cable, Wijnen, Bert (Bert), 05:40
- Personal notes from the IETF meeting, Jacob Palme, 04:40
- Re: Heard at the IETF, Fred Baker, 04:30
- Re: Addresses and ports and taxes -- oh my!, Robert Elz, 03:20
- Re: Address allocation revisited, Robert Elz, 03:10
August 04, 2000
- RE: Heard at the IETF, Dave Crocker, 21:00
- Re: Addresses and ports and taxes -- oh my!, Anthony Atkielski, 17:10
- Re: Address allocation revisited, Anthony Atkielski, 17:00
- Re: Heard at the IETF, Keith Moore, 15:40
- Re: Heard at the IETF, Michael H. Warfield, 13:20
- RE: Heard at the IETF, Bob Braden, 13:10
- Re: Addresses and ports and taxes -- oh my!, Stephen Sprunk, 12:20
- Non-USA countries and improvement in networks?, Andre-John Mas, 11:40
- Re: Addresses and ports and taxes -- oh my!, Steve Deering, 11:20
- Re: Addresses and ports and taxes -- oh my!, Steve Deering, 11:10
- Re: Addresses and ports and taxes -- oh my!, Jim_Stephenson-Dunn, 11:00
- RE: Addresses and ports and taxes -- oh my!, Parkinson, Jonathan, 10:20
- Re: Address allocation revisited, Valdis . Kletnieks, 10:10
- Re: Addresses and ports and taxes -- oh my!, Valdis . Kletnieks, 09:50
- RE: Addresses and ports and taxes -- oh my!, Brijesh Kumar, 09:40
- RE: Addresses and ports and taxes -- oh my!, Parkinson, Jonathan, 09:30
- Re: Heard at the IETF, RL 'Bob' Morgan, 09:20
- Re: Addresses and ports and taxes -- oh my!, Vernon Schryver, 09:10
- Re: Addresses and ports and taxes -- oh my!, Andre-John Mas, 08:50
- RE: Addresses and ports and taxes -- oh my!, Evstiounin, Mikhail, 08:40
- [IETF48] IPv6 shutdown time will be 11:30, Jun-ichiro itojun Hagino, 08:30
- Re: Addresses and ports and taxes -- oh my!, Anthony Atkielski, 08:20
- Re: Addresses and ports and taxes -- oh my!, Dennis Glatting, 08:10
- Re: Addresses and ports and taxes -- oh my!, Måns Nilsson, 08:00
- Re: Addresses and ports and taxes -- oh my!, Dennis Glatting, 07:50
- Re: Addresses and ports and taxes -- oh my!, Andre-John Mas, 07:10
- Re: Heard at the IETF, Andrew Rutherford, 07:00
- Re: Heard at the IETF, John Stracke, 05:50
- Re: Addresses and ports and taxes -- oh my!, Steven Cotton, 03:20
- Re: Addresses and ports and taxes -- oh my!, Mahadevan Iyer, 03:00
- Address allocation revisited, Anthony Atkielski, 02:40
- Re: Addresses and ports and taxes -- oh my!, Anthony Atkielski, 02:20
- Re: Addresses and ports and taxes -- oh my!, Anthony Atkielski, 02:10
- RE: Addresses and ports and taxes -- oh my!, vinton g. cerf, 02:00
- Re: Addresses and ports and taxes -- oh my!, Anthony Atkielski, 01:50
- Reg MIB Augments, Shaik Yunus Saleem, 01:40
- Re: Addresses and ports and taxes -- oh my!, vinton g. cerf, 01:30
- Re: Addresses and ports and taxes -- oh my!, Valdis . Kletnieks, 01:20
- Re: Heard at the IETF, Fred Baker, 01:10
- Re: Addresses and ports and taxes -- oh my!, Valdis . Kletnieks, 00:50
- Re: publication delays..., Steven M. Bellovin, 00:40
- Re: Heard at the IETF, Michael H. Warfield, 00:30
- Re: Addresses and ports and taxes -- oh my!, vinton g. cerf, 00:20
- TEST is the message still incomplete?, kysi ferul, 00:10
- Re:How Domain Name Registries are 'run.' part TWO, kysi ferul, 00:00
August 03, 2000
- Re:Domain Name Registries/ Part 2 of 11-Part PBS series, kysi ferul, 23:50
- RE: Addresses and ports and taxes -- oh my!, Philip J. Nesser II, 22:50
- Re: Addresses and ports and taxes -- oh my!, Dennis Glatting, 22:20
- Re: Addresses and ports and taxes -- oh my!, Keith Moore, 22:10
- RE: Addresses and ports and taxes -- oh my!, Jim_Stephenson-Dunn, 21:40
- RE: Addresses and ports and taxes -- oh my!, Alan Simpkins, 21:30
- Re: How Domain Name Registries are 'run.' Suggestions?, kysi ferul, 21:00
- How Domain Name Registries are 'run.' Suggestions?, kysi ferul, 20:54
- How Domain Name Registries are 'run.' Suggestions?, kysi ferul, 20:45
- Re: Heard at the IETF, Frank Solensky, 20:20
- Re: Addresses and ports and taxes -- oh my!, Keith Moore, 20:10
- Re: Heard at the IETF, Loa Andersson, 19:40
- Re: publication delays..., rhboivie, 19:20
- Re: Addresses and ports and taxes -- oh my!, Valdis . Kletnieks, 18:50
- RE: Addresses and ports and taxes -- oh my!, Scott Bradner, 18:40
- ICANN related spam, Mike Roberts, 18:30
- RE: Addresses and ports and taxes -- oh my!, John Day, 18:20
- RE: Addresses and ports and taxes -- oh my!, Evstiounin, Mikhail, 18:10
- Re: Addresses and ports and taxes -- oh my!, John Stracke, 18:00
- RE: Addresses and ports and taxes -- oh my!, Dawson, Peter D, 17:20
- Re: Heard at the IETF, Michael H. Warfield, 17:10
- RE: Addresses and ports and taxes -- oh my!, Tim Salo, 16:50
- RE: Addresses and ports and taxes -- oh my!, Rick H Wesson, 16:40
- Re: Heard at the IETF, John Stracke, 16:30
- RE: Complaint to Dept of Commerce on abuse of users by ICANN, Tim Salo, 16:20
- Re: Addresses and ports and taxes -- oh my!, Keith Moore, 16:10
- FW: Addresses and ports and taxes -- oh my!, David A. Higginbotham, 16:00
- ADL bugged Senator Mcloskey, kysi ferul, 15:50
- RE: Addresses and ports and taxes -- oh my!, Evstiounin, Mikhail, 15:40
- Re: Addresses and ports and taxes -- oh my!, Rick H Wesson, 15:30
- Re: Addresses and ports and taxes -- oh my!, Harald Alvestrand, 15:20
- RE: Complaint to Dept of Commerce on abuse of users by ICANN, Dawson, Peter D, 15:10
- Re: Heard at the IETF, James Seng, 15:00
- RE: Addresses and ports and taxes -- oh my!, Kay, Rodney, 14:50
- ADL bugged Senator Mcloskey, kysi ferul, 14:46
- ADL bugged Senator Mcloskey, kysi ferul, 14:36
- Poulsen Wireless became Federal Telegraph; then IT&T!, kysi ferul, 14:17
- Poulsen Wireless became Federal Telegraph; then IT&T!, kysi ferul, 13:58
- Re: Heard at the IETF, Jim_Stephenson-Dunn, 13:30
- Re: Addresses and ports and taxes -- oh my!, Jon Crowcroft, 13:20
- Re: Addresses and ports and taxes -- oh my!, Jim_Stephenson-Dunn, 13:10
- publication delays..., Fred Baker, 12:50
- Re: Addresses and ports and taxes -- oh my!, Brian E Carpenter, 12:40
- Re: Heard at the IETF, Bruce A. Mah, 12:20
- RE: Addresses and ports and taxes -- oh my!, Book, Robert, 12:10
- Re: Complaint to Dept of Commerce on abuse of users by ICANN, ronda, 12:06
- Re: Heard at the IETF, Robert G. Ferrell, 11:50
- Your Listserve, Michael LeBlanc, 11:40
- Re: LDAPbis I-D Review Session @ IETF#48, Kurt D. Zeilenga, 11:30
- RE: Addresses and ports and taxes -- oh my!, Dawson, Peter D, 11:20
- RE: Complaint to Dept of Commerce on abuse of users by ICANN, Steve Doty, 11:10
- RE: Addresses and ports and taxes -- oh my!, R A Lichtensteiger, 11:00
- RE: Complaint to Dept of Commerce on abuse of users by ICANN, Russ Smith, 10:50
- Re: Complaint to Dept of Commerce on abuse of users by ICANN, Jean Camp, 10:40
- Re: Addresses and ports and taxes -- oh my!, Andre-John Mas, 10:30
- Re: Heard at the IETF, Matt Crawford, 10:20
- Re: Addresses and ports and taxes -- oh my!, Bob Hinden, 10:10
- Re: Addresses and ports and taxes -- oh my!, Måns Nilsson, 10:00
- RE: Heard at the IETF, Parkinson, Jonathan, 09:50
- Re: Addresses and ports and taxes -- oh my!, Brian E Carpenter, 09:40
- Re: Addresses and ports and taxes -- oh my!, vinton g. cerf, 09:30
- Re: Addresses and ports and taxes -- oh my!, Magnus Danielson, 09:20
- Re: Addresses and ports and taxes -- oh my!, Andre-John Mas, 09:10
- RE: Addresses and ports and taxes -- oh my!, Dawson, Peter D, 09:00
- RE: Addresses and ports and taxes -- oh my!, Rakers, Jason, 08:50
- RE: Addresses and ports and taxes -- oh my!, Parkinson, Jonathan, 08:30
- RE: Addresses and ports and taxes -- oh my!, Evstiounin, Mikhail, 08:10
- RE: Heard at the IETF, Parkinson, Jonathan, 08:00
- RE: Heard at the IETF, Fred Baker, 07:50
- Re: Heard at the IETF, amlan, 07:30
- Re: Addresses and ports and taxes -- oh my!, Brian E Carpenter, 07:20
- RE: Addresses and ports and taxes -- oh my!, Rakers, Jason, 07:10
- Re: Heard at the IETF, Randall . Gale, 07:00
- LDAPbis I-D Review Session @ IETF#48, Kurt D. Zeilenga, 06:50
- RE: Addresses and ports and taxes -- oh my!, Dawson, Peter D, 06:40
- Re: Heard at the IETF, Robert G. Ferrell, 06:30
- Re: Heard at the IETF, John Day, 06:10
- Addresses and ports and taxes -- oh my!, Dennis Glatting, 05:40
- Re: Heard at the IETF, Hans E. Kristiansen, 00:50
August 02, 2000
- RE: Heard at the IETF, Fred Baker, 23:20
- RE: Heard at the IETF, tim christensen, 15:10
- Re: Heard at the IETF, Fred Baker, 14:40
- Re: Heard at the IETF, John Day, 14:30
- Re: Heard at the IETF, Michael H. Warfield, 13:50
- RE: Heard at the IETF, Dawson, Peter D, 13:30
- RE: Heard at the IETF, Scott Lawrence, 13:20
- Re: Heard at the IETF, Steven M. Bellovin, 13:10
- Re: Heard at the IETF, John Day, 13:00
- Re: Heard at the IETF, Randall D. Hayes, 12:20
- RE: Heard at the IETF, Paul Francis, 12:00
- RE: Heard at the IETF, Lillian Komlossy, 11:50
- Re: Heard at the IETF, Alain Durand, 11:40
- Re: Heard at the IETF, Jon Crowcroft, 10:50
- RE: Heard at the IETF, Dawson, Peter D, 10:00
- Heard at the IETF, Dennis Glatting, 09:00
- Re: List, Beni Arazi, 08:40
- Re: [dnso.discuss] Re: Complaint to Dept of Commerce on abuse of users by ICANN, Scott Brim, 08:30
- RE: List, Ashish Sood, 08:20
- draft-ietf-aaa-na-reqts-05.txt, Randy Bush, 08:10
- draft-ietf-aaa-na-reqts-05.txt, Randy Bush, 08:00
- Re: List, Walter G, 07:50
- Re: List, Anthony Atkielski, 07:20
- Re: List, maltaraireh, 07:00
- Re: List, Donald E. Eastlake 3rd, 06:10
- List, Rakers, Jason, 05:50
August 01, 2000
- Re: Question about the character set in HTTP-URLs, Martin J. Duerst, 22:00
- Re: [dnso.discuss] Re: Complaint to Dept of Commerce on abuse of users by ICANN, Michael Sondow, 17:30
- Re: [dnso.discuss] Re: Complaint to Dept of Commerce on abuse of users by ICANN, Michael Sondow, 17:10
- RE: BOUNCE ietf+censored(_at_)dokka(_dot_)maxware(_dot_)no: taboo header: /From:.*Kysi Ferul/i, Keith W. Bacon, 16:20
- Re: [dnso.discuss] Re: Complaint to Dept of Commerce on abuse of users by ICANN, Fred Baker, 16:10
- Re: You are Turning Away Outside Members Who Attempt To Register, Fred Baker, 16:00
- Re: Question about the character set in HTTP-URLs, James P. Salsman, 15:50
- Executive Summary; "CALIFORNIA STAR" (Digital High Schools AB64 ), kysi ferul, 15:40
- Dot.Com Directory Proposal for IETF (www.3165742.com), kysi ferul, 15:30
- Dot.Com Directory Proposal for IETF (www.3165742.com), kysi ferul, 15:21
- Executive Summary; "CALIFORNIA STAR" (Digital High Schools AB64 ), kysi ferul, 15:00
- Dot.Com Directory Proposal for IETF (www.3165742.com), kysi ferul, 14:50
- Re: You are Turning Away Outside Members Who Attempt To Register, Valdis . Kletnieks, 14:10
- Re: You are Turning Away Outside Members Who Attempt To Register, cpart, 13:20
- Kerberized Key Management Protocol BOF, Wed, Aug 2, 0900-1130, Derek Atkins, 12:40
- RRe: Complaint to Dept of Commerce on abuse of users by ICANN, Robert G. Ferrell, 09:30
- Re: Bit pattern Matching, Valdis . Kletnieks, 07:30
- CRAPS BOF Followup, Phil Neumiller, 07:20
- Re: Bit pattern Matching, John Day, 06:30
- Question about the character set in HTTP-URLs, Florian Große-Coosmann, 05:10
- Bit pattern Matching, Ashish Sood, 04:30
- Request for link, links, 02:40