IETF Discussion (date)
February 28, 2001
- FAQ: The IETF+Censored list, Harald Tveit Alvestrand, 17:20
- RE: HTML better for small PDAs, Rosen, Brian, 12:30
- Re: Network Edge definition (Re: An alternative to TCP (part 1)), Michael W. Condry, 10:40
- Re: HTML better for small PDAs, John Stracke, 10:20
- Re: HTML better for small PDAs, John Stracke, 10:10
- BetterWhois Search: 168.com, BetterWhois.com, 09:20
- Re: New version of Code of Conduct, Jeff Williams, 08:50
- RE: An I-D experiment (Re: HTML better for small PDAs), Rosen, Brian, 07:20
- Re: the advocates for non-ASCII RFC's, Michael Mealling, 05:40
- hello, Ali Boudani, 03:20
- the advocates for non-ASCII RFC's, James P. Salsman, 02:30
February 27, 2001
- BURP BoF Announcement, Subir Das, 15:30
- Re: XML, etc, Henning G. Schulzrinne, 13:00
- Re: An I-D experiment (Re: HTML better for small PDAs), Michael Richardson, 11:40
- Lucent Sponsor, Jennifer Klahre, 11:00
- Re: XML, etc, Valdis . Kletnieks, 10:30
- Re: XML, etc, Michael Mealling, 10:10
- XML, etc, Bob Braden, 10:00
- RE: An I-D experiment (Re: HTML better for small PDAs), graham . travers, 09:50
- Re: An I-D experiment (Re: HTML better for small PDAs), Michael Richardson, 09:40
- Re: An I-D experiment (Re: HTML better for small PDAs), Vernon Schryver, 08:40
- Re: HTML better for small PDAs, Jon Crowcroft, 06:20
- An I-D experiment (Re: HTML better for small PDAs), Harald Alvestrand, 06:00
- RE: HTML better for small PDAs, joaquin . riverarodriguez, 05:50
- RE: HTML better for small PDAs, graham . travers, 03:40
February 26, 2001
- Test message (please delete), Cheng Jack-QA3581, 20:50
- Re: HTML better for small PDAs, Bora Akyol, 20:40
- Re: HTML better for small PDAs, Michael Mealling, 20:30
- Re: HTML better for small PDAs, Lyndon Nerenberg, 20:00
- Re: HTML better for small PDAs, Marshall T. Rose, 19:40
- RE: Writing Internet Drafts on a Macintosh, Tony Hain, 18:50
- Re: HTML better for small PDAs, Valdis . Kletnieks, 17:40
- Re: EDIINT WG ??, ned . freed, 17:30
- Re: HTML better for small PDAs, Bora Akyol, 17:20
- Re: HTML better for small PDAs, Marshall T. Rose, 17:10
- Re: HTML better for small PDAs, Vernon Schryver, 17:00
- Re: HTML better for small PDAs, Vernon Schryver, 16:50
- Re: HTML better for small PDAs, Lyndon Nerenberg, 16:30
- EDIINT WG ??, Dawson, Peter D, 16:20
- Re: HTML better for small PDAs, Bora Akyol, 16:10
- Re: HTML better for small PDAs, Bora Akyol, 16:00
- Re: HTML better for small PDAs, Marshall T. Rose, 15:40
- Re: HTML better for small PDAs, Michael Richardson, 15:30
- Re: HTML better for small PDAs, Vernon Schryver, 14:00
- Re: HTML better for small PDAs, Michael Richardson, 12:40
- RE: HTML better for small PDAs, graham . travers, 10:30
- Re: Why XML is perferable, John Stracke, 10:20
- RE: HTML better for small PDAs, Christian Huitema, 09:50
- Software engineer, Kian Haghdad, 04:22
- RE: HTML better for small PDAs, graham . travers, 03:00
February 24, 2001
- Re: Why XML is perferable, Scott Brim, 19:40
- Re: Why XML is perferable, Eliot Lear, 17:50
- Re: Why XML is perferable, Ren, 16:50
- Re: Why XML is perferable, Stephen McHenry, 16:20
- Re: Why XML is perferable: manipulating and presentation, Carl Malamud, 15:10
- Re: Why XML is perferable, Bob Braden, 13:30
- Re: Why XML is perferable, Harald Alvestrand, 11:20
- Re: Why XML is perferable, Sean Finn, 09:30
- Re: Why XML is perferable, Jun'an Gao, 07:00
- anti-plane rant (was RE: draft-anderson-forces-req-00.txt), tom worster, 06:20
February 23, 2001
- HTML same problem with TXT. XML/SGML the solution, Wang Xianzhu, 19:30
- Re: Why XML is perferable: manipulating and presentation, Wang Xianzhu, 19:20
- Re: HTML better for small PDAs, Valdis . Kletnieks, 13:10
- Re: Writing Internet Drafts on a Macintosh, Theodore Y. Ts'o, 13:00
- Re: HTML better for small PDAs, Robert G. Ferrell, 12:00
- RE: HTML better for small PDAs, Christian Huitema, 11:00
- Re: HTML better for small PDAs, Valdis . Kletnieks, 10:50
- Re: Why XML is perferable, Bob Braden, 10:40
- RE: HTML better for small PDAs, Doug Sauder, 10:30
- Re: Why XML is perferable, Valdis . Kletnieks, 10:10
- RE: HTML better for small PDAs, Doug Sauder, 08:20
- Re: HTML (was: Writing Internet Drafts on a Macintosh), Sandy Wills, 07:40
- Re: was Why we shouldn' use ASCII text (now censorship), Jon Crowcroft, 07:30
- Re: Writing Internet Drafts on a Macintosh, John Border, 07:20
- Re: Writing Internet Drafts on a Macintosh, Johnny Eriksson, 06:00
- Re: Writing Internet Drafts on a Macintosh, Rahmat M. Samik-Ibrahim, 04:50
- HTML vs. TXT: let's compare!, Rahmat M. Samik-Ibrahim, 04:40
- RE: Why XML is perferable, Shaw, Robert, 04:10
- RE: HTML better for small PDAs, graham . travers, 04:00
- Re: Why XML is perferable, Jon Crowcroft, 03:10
- RE: Why XML is perferable, graham . travers, 02:40
- RE: Why XML is perferable, graham . travers, 02:30
- Why XML is perferable, Wang Xianzhu, 02:20
- Re: Why we shouldn' use ASCII text, James Aldridge, 01:40
February 22, 2001
- Re: Why XML is perferable, Jorge Amodio, 23:40
- Re: Why XML is perferable, Jun'an Gao, 23:10
- Re: Why XML is perferable, Jun'an Gao, 23:00
- Re: Why XML is perferable, Wang Xianzhu, 22:50
- Re: Why XML is perferable, Valdis . Kletnieks, 21:30
- Sascom finally available outside Japan, Ole J. Jacobsen, 21:20
- Why XML is perferable, Jun'an Gao, 20:50
- Re: HTML better for small PDAs, Valdis . Kletnieks, 20:40
- RE: HTML better for small PDAs, Doug Sauder, 19:00
- Re: Writing Internet Drafts on a Macintosh, Randall Gellens, 16:50
- Re: Writing Internet Drafts on a Macintosh, Alfonso De Gregorio, 16:40
- Re: HTML better for small PDAs, Valdis . Kletnieks, 16:20
- Re: Writing Internet Drafts on a Macintosh, David T. Perkins, 16:10
- Re: Writing Internet Drafts on a Macintosh, Alfonso De Gregorio, 16:00
- HTML better for small PDAs, Doug Sauder, 15:30
- Re: Writing Internet Drafts on a Macintosh, James P. Salsman, 15:00
- Re: Writing Internet Drafts on a Macintosh, Keith Moore, 14:50
- Re: PWOT Mailing List, Keith Moore, 14:40
- Re: was Why we shouldn' use ASCII text (now censorship), Randy Bush, 14:20
- Re: Why we shouldn' use ASCII text, Steven M. Bellovin, 14:10
- Re: Writing Internet Drafts on a Macintosh, Patrik Fältström, 14:00
- Re: PWOT Mailing List, Allison Mankin, 13:40
- Re: Writing Internet Drafts on a Macintosh, Robert G. Ferrell, 13:30
- Re: Why we shouldn' use ASCII text, Alex Kamantauskas, 13:20
- Re: Why we shouldn' use ASCII text, John Stracke, 13:10
- Re: Writing Internet Drafts on a Macintosh, Keith Moore, 13:00
- Re: Writing Internet Drafts on a Macintosh, Michael Mealling, 12:50
- Re: Writing Internet Drafts on a Macintosh, Patrik Fältström, 12:30
- Re: Writing Internet Drafts on a Macintosh, Patrik Fältström, 12:20
- Re: PWOT Mailing List, Danny McPherson, 12:10
- Re: was Why we shouldn' use ASCII text (now censorship), Jon Crowcroft, 12:00
- Re: Why we shouldn' use ASCII text, Anthony Atkielski, 11:50
- Re: BGP AS, leo vegoda, 11:40
- Re: Why we shouldn' use ASCII text, Henning Schulzrinne, 11:30
- Re: Writing Internet Drafts on a Macintosh, Vernon Schryver, 11:10
- PWOT Mailing List, Danny McPherson, 11:00
- Re: Why we shouldn' use ASCII text, Valdis . Kletnieks, 10:50
- Re: Why we shouldn' use ASCII text, Jon Crowcroft, 10:40
- Re: Writing Internet Drafts on a Macintosh, Stephen McHenry, 10:30
- Re: Why we shouldn' use ASCII text, Harald Alvestrand, 10:10
- Re: Writing Internet Drafts on a Macintosh, Keith Moore, 10:00
- Re: Writing Internet Drafts on a Macintosh, Mark Allman, 09:40
- Re: Writing Internet Drafts on a Macintosh, Robert G. Ferrell, 09:30
- Re: Writing Internet Drafts on a Macintosh, Bill Manning, 09:20
- Re: Writing Internet Drafts on a Macintosh, John Stracke, 09:00
- Re: Why we shouldn' use ASCII text, Jon Crowcroft, 08:40
- Re: Multicast File Distribution protocols?, Scott Lawrence, 08:30
- Re: Writing Internet Drafts on a Macintosh, Keith Moore, 08:20
- Re: Writing Internet Drafts on a Macintosh, Randy Bush, 08:10
- Re: Writing Internet Drafts on a Macintosh, Patrick McManus, 07:50
- Why we shouldn' use ASCII text, Taylor Salman, 07:30
- Re: Writing Internet Drafts on a Macintosh, Scott Brim, 07:10
- Re: Writing Internet Drafts on a Macintosh, David C Lawrence, 06:10
- m3ua conformance test cases ?, Prashant Sharma, 05:50
- Re: Writing Internet Drafts on a Macintosh, V Guruprasad, 05:10
- Writing Internet Drafts on a Macintosh, Bora Akyol, 00:00
February 21, 2001
- Re: Mailing list problems, Ross Finlayson, 19:10
- Mailing list problems, DonNiall, 17:20
- Mailing list problems, DonNiall, 17:10
- Re: Multicast File Distribution protocols?, Jon Crowcroft, 14:40
- International Emergency Preference Scheme (IEPS), Folts, Harold, 13:50
- Re: Multicast File Distribution protocols?, John Kristoff, 13:10
- Re: Multicast File Distribution protocols?, John Border, 12:40
- Multicast File Distribution protocols?, Mark Atwood, 12:10
- Web archive for IETF list off-line, C. M. Heard, 10:10
February 16, 2001
- Re: [midcom] WG scope/deliverables, Sean Doran, 19:50
- Re: [midcom] WG scope/deliverables, Keith Moore, 19:40
- Re: [midcom] WG scope/deliverables, Keith Moore, 19:30
- Re: NAT natural example, Re: [midcom] WG scope/deliverables, Ed Gerck, 18:50
- Re: [midcom] WG scope/deliverables, Sean Doran, 17:40
- RE: [midcom] WG scope/deliverables, Fleischman, Eric W, 17:30
- Re: [midcom] WG scope/deliverables, Brian E Carpenter, 15:50
- RE: IPv6 / NAT, Tony Hain, 12:40
- Assurred Services, Dhiman Barman, 12:00
- Join us at XML DevCon!, Camelot Events Reminder, 11:30
- Re: NAT natural example, Re: [midcom] WG scope/deliverables, Keith Moore, 11:20
- Re: NAT natural example, Re: [midcom] WG scope/deliverables, Steve Deering, 10:40
- Re: NAT natural example, Re: [midcom] WG scope/deliverables, Ed Gerck, 09:20
- Re: NAT natural example, Re: [midcom] WG scope/deliverables, Brian E Carpenter, 07:20
- Re: [midcom] WG scope/deliverables, Eric Brunner-Williams in Portland Maine, 05:50
- Re: NAT natural example, Re: [midcom] WG scope/deliverables, Melinda Shore, 05:00
- Re: NAT natural example, Re: [midcom] WG scope/deliverables, Steve Deering, 01:20
- Re: [midcom] WG scope/deliverables, David R. Conrad, 00:00
February 15, 2001
- Re: [midcom] WG scope/deliverables, David R. Conrad, 23:40
- Re: NAT natural example, Re: [midcom] WG scope/deliverables, Ed Gerck, 22:50
- IPv6 / NAT, Kyle Lussier, 22:00
- Re: NAT natural example, Ofer Inbar, 21:10
- Re: NAT natural example, Re: [midcom] WG scope/deliverables, Keith Moore, 21:00
- Re: NAT natural example, Re: [midcom] WG scope/deliverables, Steve Deering, 20:50
- Re: NAT natural example, Re: [midcom] WG scope/deliverables, Ed Gerck, 20:40
- Re: [midcom] WG scope/deliverables, John C Klensin, 20:00
- Re: NAT natural example, Re: [midcom] WG scope/deliverables, Ed Gerck, 19:40
- Re: NAT natural example, Re: [midcom] WG scope/deliverables, Steven M. Bellovin, 19:20
- Re: NAT natural example, Re: [midcom] WG scope/deliverables, Steve Deering, 19:00
- Re: [midcom] WG scope/deliverables, Bernard D. Aboba, 17:30
- NAT natural example, Re: [midcom] WG scope/deliverables, Ed Gerck, 16:50
- Re: [midcom] WG scope/deliverables, Randy Bush, 14:40
- Nas SDP, Ravi Shankar, 14:30
- Re: [midcom] WG scope/deliverables, Keith Moore, 14:20
- Re: [midcom] WG scope/deliverables, David R. Conrad, 14:10
- Re: [midcom] WG scope/deliverables, Keith Moore, 14:00
- Re: [midcom] WG scope/deliverables, Steven M. Bellovin, 13:40
- Re: [midcom] WG scope/deliverables, V Guruprasad, 13:30
- RE: [midcom] WG scope/deliverables, Randy Bush, 11:30
- RE: [midcom] WG scope/deliverables, Bernard Aboba, 11:20
- Re: [midcom] WG scope/deliverables, Ed Gerck, 11:10
- Re: WG scope/deliverables, Valdis . Kletnieks, 10:40
- Re: Announcement: new email reflector for IP over InfiniBand, Joe Touch, 10:30
- Re: WG scope/deliverables, Mark Nottingham, 10:20
- Re: Relation email - person (re: Mail sent to midcom), Vernon Schryver, 10:10
- Re: [midcom] WG scope/deliverables, Robert G. Ferrell, 10:00
- Re: [midcom] WG scope/deliverables, Keith Moore, 09:20
- Re: [midcom] WG scope/deliverables, Randy Bush, 08:50
- Re: Relation email - person (re: Mail sent to midcom), John Stracke, 08:40
- Re: [midcom] WG scope/deliverables, Keith Moore, 08:10
- Re: [midcom] WG scope/deliverables, V Guruprasad, 08:00
- Re: [midcom] WG scope/deliverables, Keith Moore, 07:50
- Re: [midcom] WG scope/deliverables, V Guruprasad, 06:50
- Re: [midcom] WG scope/deliverables, Randy Bush, 06:20
- Re: [midcom] WG scope/deliverables, Brian E Carpenter, 06:10
- Re: [midcom] WG scope/deliverables, Melinda Shore, 05:40
- Re: [midcom] WG scope/deliverables, Eric Brunner-Williams in Portland Maine, 05:00
- Re: [midcom] WG scope/deliverables, John Kristoff, 03:50
- RE: Relation email - person (re: Mail sent to midcom), Dassa, 01:20
February 14, 2001
- Re: [midcom] WG scope/deliverables, J. Noel Chiappa, 23:30
- Re: [midcom] WG scope/deliverables, Eliot Lear, 21:50
- Re: [midcom] WG scope/deliverables, Keith Moore, 21:00
- Re: [midcom] WG scope/deliverables, David R. Conrad, 20:50
- Re: [midcom] WG scope/deliverables, Keith Moore, 20:30
- Re: [midcom] WG scope/deliverables, David R. Conrad, 20:20
- Re: [midcom] WG scope/deliverables, Keith Moore, 20:10
- Re: [midcom] WG scope/deliverables, Keith Moore, 20:00
- DNSng: where to discuss/get info?, Rahmat M. Samik-Ibrahim, 19:50
- Re: [midcom] WG scope/deliverables, Michael W. Condry, 19:10
- Announcement: new email reflector for IP over InfiniBand, Dan Cassiday - High End Server Systems, 10:30
- Re: Relation email - person (re: Mail sent to midcom), Valdis . Kletnieks, 09:50
- Middlebox taxonomy draft & BOF, Brian E Carpenter, 08:40
- Re: what is NAT Good For ..., Jon Crowcroft, 08:30
- RE: Relation email - person (re: Mail sent to midcom), Dassa, 04:30
- Re: Relation email - person (re: Mail sent to midcom), Harald Alvestrand, 04:00
- Re: An alternative to TCP (part 1), James P. Salsman, 01:20
February 13, 2001
- Internet Governance - UPDATE, Jay Fenello, 22:30
- Re: Relation email - person (re: Mail sent to midcom), Vernon Schryver, 15:50
- Re: Relation email - person (re: Mail sent to midcom), Keith Moore, 15:20
- RE: Media Access Control list, Rakers, Jason, 14:40
- Re: An alternative to TCP (part 1), Fred Baker, 14:30
- Re: Relation email - person (re: Mail sent to midcom), John Stracke, 13:30
- RE: Media Access Control list, Uyeshiro, Robin, 13:00
- Re: Media Access Control list, Gary E. Miller, 12:50
- RE: Media Access Control list, Otto Rush, 12:40
- Re: Media Access Control list, ned . freed, 12:20
- RE: Media Access Control list, Dunlap, Randy, 12:10
- Relation email - person (re: Mail sent to midcom), Harald Alvestrand, 12:00
- Re: Media Access Control list, Robert G. Ferrell, 11:50
- Re: More member-only anti-spam, James M Galvin, 11:40
- Media Access Control list, Rakers, Jason, 11:10
- Re: More member-only anti-spam, RJ Atkinson, 08:10
- Re: More member-only anti-spam, Emmanuel Duros, 07:20
- re: Mail sent to midcom, Mike O'Dell, 07:10
February 12, 2001
- RE: [seamoby] BOF: IP over Bluetooth for 50th Meeting of IETF., Kulwinder Atwal, 11:40
- Re: [seamoby] BOF: IP over Bluetooth for 50th Meeting of IETF., James Kempf, 11:30
- Re: SCP-SCP, Joel Jaeggli, 09:30
- Re: Not developing protocols, Valdis . Kletnieks, 08:50
- Re: An alternative to TCP (part 1), Mark Allman, 08:20
- SCP-SCP, Jalaj Bansal, 07:50
- Re: Not developing protocols, Kevin Farley, 07:30
- RE: BOF: IP over Bluetooth for 50th Meeting of IETF., Thakare, Kiran, 03:10
- Re: Not developing protocols, Vernon Schryver, 01:00
- http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/ietf/Current/maillist.html, James P. Salsman, 00:20
February 11, 2001
- RE: Not developing (bad) protocols, Bernard Aboba, 22:30
- ABOUT: MPLS-VPN, RD, xiaolee, 18:50
- Re: Not developing protocols, James Seng/Personal, 18:00
- Re: Not developing protocols, Ofer Inbar, 17:20
- Re: Not developing protocols, Vernon Schryver, 16:20
- RE: [seamoby] Re: BOF: IP over Bluetooth for 50th Meeting of IETF ., Kulwinder Atwal, 15:10
- Re: Not developing protocols, Ofer Inbar, 14:50
- Re: ECC limits? (was RE: An alternative to TCP ...), Jon Crowcroft, 08:10
- Re: An alternative to TCP (part 1), Jun'an Gao, 07:20
- Re: BOF: IP over Bluetooth for 50th Meeting of IETF., Randy Bush, 06:20
- BOF: IP over Bluetooth for 50th Meeting of IETF., David Almer zahav, 06:10
February 09, 2001
- Re: Congressional hearings, Jeff Williams, 23:30
- Re: Ricochet/Metricom, Michael H. Warfield, 20:50
- Ricochet/Metricom, James P. Salsman, 20:00
- Re: An alternative to TCP (part 1), Richard Carlson, 18:30
- RE: ECC limits? (was RE: An alternative to TCP ...), Christian Huitema, 18:20
- ECC limits? (was RE: An alternative to TCP ...), James P. Salsman, 17:40
- Re: NECP, jamal, 17:30
- Re: NECP, James P. Salsman, 17:20
- BOF: IP over Bluetooth for 50th Meeting of IETF., Kulwinder Atwal, 17:10
- Not developing protocols (was: Re: An alternative to TCP (part 1)), John Stracke, 10:10
- Re: Delta encoding in HTTP to Proposed Standard, Mark Nottingham, 09:30
- RE: Network Edge definition (Re: An alternative to TCP (part 1)), Bojan Lekovic, 06:40
- Re: Delta encoding in HTTP to Proposed Standard, Neale Banks, 06:30
- Re: An alternative to TCP (part 1), Randall R. Stewart, 06:10
- Re: An alternative to TCP (part 1), Randall R. Stewart, 05:40
- Re: Network Edge definition (Re: An alternative to TCP (part 1)), Marvin Sanchez Garache, 04:40
- RE: An alternative to TCP (part 1), Bernard Aboba, 00:30
- unsubcribe me !!, Sengupta Sourav, 00:20
February 08, 2001
- Re: An alternative to TCP (part 1), Jun'an Gao, 20:20
- Re: An alternative to TCP (part 1), tytso, 16:00
- Re: To whom is ICANN answerable?, J. Noel Chiappa, 14:40
- Re: john klensin evaluates ICANN, Brian E Carpenter, 13:40
- RE: An alternative to TCP (part 1), Bernard Aboba, 11:30
- Re: An alternative to TCP (part 1), Randall R. Stewart, 11:10
- Re: john klensin evaluates ICANN, Randy Bush, 10:30
- Re: Network Edge definition (Re: An alternative to TCP (part 1)), Joe Touch, 10:10
- john klensin evaluates ICANN, Richard J. Sexton, 10:00
- RE: An alternative to TCP (part 1), Iliff, Tina, 09:50
- Re: To whom is ICANN answerable?, Ravi Shiroor, 09:40
- Re: To whom is ICANN answerable?, Keith Moore, 09:30
- Re: To whom is ICANN answerable?, Randy Bush, 09:20
- RE: To whom is ICANN answerable?, Liz Walter, 09:10
- NECP, jamal, 09:00
- Re: An alternative to TCP (part 1), John Stracke, 08:50
- RE: An alternative to TCP (part 2), Iliff, Tina, 08:40
- Re: To whom is ICANN answerable?, Ravi Shiroor, 08:30
- Re: To whom is ICANN answerable?, david, 08:20
- Re: To whom is ICANN answerable?, david, 08:10
- Re: To whom is ICANN answerable?, John C Klensin, 08:00
- Re: To whom is ICANN answerable?, Randy Bush, 07:30
- Re: To whom is ICANN answerable?, Robert G. Ferrell, 06:30
- To whom is ICANN answerable?, Graham Klyne, 05:40
- Network Edge definition (Re: An alternative to TCP (part 1)), Harald Alvestrand, 04:20
- Managing Complex Organizations in a Complex World, NECSI Executive Education, 02:30
- Re: An alternative to TCP (part 1), Jun'an Gao, 02:00
- Re: An alternative to TCP (part 1), joaquin . riverarodriguez, 01:20
February 07, 2001
- RE: An alternative to TCP (part 2), Jun'an Gao, 18:50
- Re: An alternative to TCP (part 1), Jun'an Gao, 18:40
- Re: An alternative to TCP (part 1), Jun'an Gao, 18:30
- RE: An alternative to TCP (part 1), Larry Foore, 18:10
- Re: An alternative to TCP (part 1), Jun'an Gao, 18:00
- Re: An alternative to TCP (part 1), Mahadevan Iyer, 17:20
- Re: An alternative to TCP (part 1), Kevin Farley, 16:20
- Re: QoS, Brian E Carpenter, 16:10
- QoS, narakamath, 15:20
- Re: An alternative to TCP (part 1), Mark Allman, 14:20
- RE: An alternative to TCP (part 2), Iliff, Tina, 13:08
- Re: An alternative to TCP (part 1), Keith Moore, 12:10
- SIGCOMM Latin America Advance Program available, Craig Partridge, 11:30
- Re: An alternative to TCP (part 1), Bob Braden, 10:10
- Re: An alternative to TCP (part 1), Harald Alvestrand, 10:00
- Re: An alternative to TCP (part 1), John Stracke, 09:10
- Re: An alternative to TCP (part 1), Richard Carlson, 08:40
- Re: Short sequences (Re: An alternative to TCP (part 1)), Matt Crawford, 08:00
- Re: An alternative to TCP (part 2), Jun'an Gao, 07:30
- RE: An alternative to TCP (part 1), aaron, 07:10
- Re: Short sequences (Re: An alternative to TCP (part 1)), Keith Moore, 06:40
- Re: I-D ACTION: draft-ietf-ipngwg-addr-arch-v3-04.txt, Mr. James W. Laferriere, 06:10
- Re: An alternative to TCP (part 1), Jon Crowcroft, 01:10
- Re: An alternative to TCP (part 1), Jun'an Gao, 00:50
- Re: An alternative to TCP (part 1), Jun'an Gao, 00:00
February 06, 2001
- Short sequences (Re: An alternative to TCP (part 1)), Harald Alvestrand, 23:00
- Re: An alternative to TCP (part 1), Rahmat M. Samik-Ibrahim, 22:30
- Re: An alternative to TCP (part 1), Colin Perkins, 21:40
- Re: An alternative to TCP (part 1), Keith Moore, 20:50
- RE: An alternative to TCP (part 1), Larry Foore, 20:10
- RE: An alternative to TCP (part 1), Jun'an Gao, 20:00
- Re: An alternative to TCP (part 1), Jun'an Gao, 19:50
- Re: An alternative to TCP (part 1), Jun'an Gao, 19:40
- Re: An alternative to TCP (part 1), Jun'an Gao, 19:30
- RE: An alternative to TCP (part 1), Jun'an Gao, 19:10
- Re: An alternative to TCP (part 1), stanislav shalunov, 18:50
- RE: An alternative to TCP (part 1), Tony Hain, 18:00
- RE: An alternative to TCP (part 1), Larry Foore, 15:30
- RE: An alternative to TCP (part 1), Christian Huitema, 15:10
- Re: An alternative to TCP (part 1), stanislav shalunov, 10:50
- Re: An alternative to TCP (part 1), John Stracke, 10:00
- Re: An alternative to TCP (part 1), Valdis . Kletnieks, 08:10
- An alternative to TCP (part 1), Jun'an Gao, 07:30
February 05, 2001
- Re: Point to Multipoint, Jasen G. Strutt, 19:00
- Point to Multipoint, ME, 15:10
- Re: RFC 2260, Valdis . Kletnieks, 14:40
- RFC 2260, Dave Robinson, 14:10
- MTU Settings, Stevan Pierce, 12:00
- Re: STD-2 is obsolete, Joe Touch, 11:20
- Re: NAT ... again, Kevin Farley, 10:20
- Re: "redesign[ing] the architecture of the Internet", narakamath, 07:40
- BenefitsAll, Benefitsall, 00:20
February 04, 2001
- Re: STD-2 is obsolete, Rahmat M. Samik-Ibrahim, 23:50
- Re: "redesign[ing] the architecture of the Internet", Bob Braden, 22:10
- IETF50 event social register page, itojun, 18:50
- Re: "redesign[ing] the architecture of the Internet", Keith Moore, 16:10
- Re: "redesign[ing] the architecture of the Internet", Keith Moore, 15:30
- Re: "redesign[ing] the architecture of the Internet", Peter Deutsch in Mountain View, 15:20
- Welcome to Light Reading, lightreading-sender-21957, 14:00
- Re: "redesign[ing] the architecture of the Internet", Eliot Lear, 11:10
- Re: NAT isn't a firewall Re: harbinger, Re: [midcom] WG scope/deliverables, Scott Brim, 11:00
- Re: NAT isn't a firewall Re: harbinger, Re: [midcom] WG scope/deliverables, Jon Crowcroft, 10:30
- Re: FAQ: The IETF+Censored list, Harald Alvestrand, 10:10
- Re: "redesign[ing] the architecture of the Internet", Keith Moore, 00:00
February 03, 2001
- Re: "redesign[ing] the architecture of the Internet", Vernon Schryver, 22:50
- Re: "redesign[ing] the architecture of the Internet", Vernon Schryver, 17:10
- Re: "redesign[ing] the architecture of the Internet", Keith Moore, 15:20
- Re: NAT isn't a firewall Re: harbinger, Re: [midcom] WG scope/deliverables, Scott Brim, 13:30
- Re: "redesign[ing] the architecture of the Internet", Dave Crocker, 12:20
- NAT isn't a firewall Re: harbinger, Re: [midcom] WG scope/deliverables, Grenville Armitage, 11:50
- Re: "redesign[ing] the architecture of the Internet", Eliot Lear, 11:30
- Re: harbinger, Re: [midcom] WG scope/deliverables, Einar Stefferud, 00:10
February 02, 2001
- Re: harbinger, Re: [midcom] WG scope/deliverables, Keith Moore, 22:30
- Re: "redesign[ing] the architecture of the Internet", Keith Moore, 22:20
- Re: harbinger, Re: [midcom] WG scope/deliverables, Ed Gerck, 22:10
- "redesign[ing] the architecture of the Internet", Sean Doran, 17:50
- Re: harbinger, Re: [midcom] WG scope/deliverables, Bob Braden, 17:40
- WOW!, a friend, 16:40
- Re: Mail sent to midcom (fwd), Dave Crocker, 16:30
- Re: harbinger, Re: [midcom] WG scope/deliverables, Grenville Armitage, 16:20
- Re: harbinger, Re: [midcom] WG scope/deliverables, Ed Gerck, 16:10
- Re: harbinger, Re: [midcom] WG scope/deliverables, Keith Moore, 15:30
- harbinger, Re: [midcom] WG scope/deliverables, Ed Gerck, 15:10
- Re: Mail sent to midcom (fwd), Melinda Shore, 13:40
- Re: Mail sent to midcom (fwd), Keith Moore, 13:30
- Re: [midcom] WG scope/deliverables, Greg Minshall, 13:00
- Re: Mail sent to midcom (fwd), Michael Richardson, 12:00
- Re: STD-2 is obsolete, Joe Touch, 11:30
- Re: Mail sent to midcom (fwd), Jeff Williams, 11:20
- Light, PI Gig E - 2001 Annual Report see http://cookreport.com/lightipgige.shtml, Gordon Cook, 11:12
- Re: Mail sent to midcom (fwd), James M Galvin, 09:50
- Re: Mail sent to midcom (fwd), Keith Moore, 09:20
- rule-based moderation (was Re: Mail sent to midcom (fwd)), James P. Salsman, 09:10
- Re: Mail sent to midcom (fwd), James M Galvin, 08:40
- Re: Mail sent to midcom (fwd), Vernon Schryver, 08:30
- Re: Mail sent to midcom (fwd), James M Galvin, 08:20
- Re: Mail sent to midcom (fwd), John Leslie, 07:10
- Out of Office AutoReply: Revealed! - Scientifically Proven Strate gies......., Cameron Smith, 06:30
- Revealed! - Scientifically Proven Strategies......., ietf, 06:10
- Revealed! - Scientifically Proven Strategies......., ietf, 06:00
- Re: Mail sent to midcom (fwd), Thomas Narten, 05:20
- Re: STD-2 is obsolete, Rahmat M. Samik-Ibrahim, 04:00
- Re: Mail sent to midcom (fwd), James P. Salsman, 03:00
February 01, 2001
- Re: Mail sent to midcom (fwd), Keith Moore, 18:10
- Re: Mail sent to midcom (fwd), Keith Moore, 17:10
- Re: Mail sent to midcom (fwd), Donald E. Eastlake 3rd, 16:40
- Re: Mail sent to midcom (fwd), Michael Richardson, 16:00
- Re: Mail sent to midcom (fwd), Keith Moore, 14:10
- Re: Mail sent to midcom (fwd), James M Galvin, 13:50
- Re: [midcom] WG scope/deliverables, V Guruprasad, 13:20
- Re: Mail sent to midcom (fwd), Keith Moore, 12:50
- Re: [midcom] WG scope/deliverables, Keith Moore, 12:40
- Re: STD-2 is obsolete, Joe Touch, 12:30
- Re: STD-2 is obsolete, Brian E Carpenter, 12:10
- Re: [midcom] WG scope/deliverables, Hilarie Orman, 12:00
- Re: [midcom] WG scope/deliverables, Greg Minshall, 11:40
- Re: [midcom] WG scope/deliverables, Dave Crocker, 11:20
- Re: STD-2 is obsolete, Joe Touch, 11:10
- Re: Mail sent to midcom (fwd), Melinda Shore, 10:50
- head hurting [was Re: [midcom] WG scope/deliverables, Brian E Carpenter, 10:40
- Re: First bit of IP Addresses, Valdis . Kletnieks, 08:00
- Re: [midcom] WG scope/deliverables, Valdis . Kletnieks, 07:50
- NATs and peer-to-peer (was Re: [midcom]...), James P. Salsman, 05:50
- STD-2 is obsolete, Rahmat M. Samik-Ibrahim, 05:40
- Re: First bit of IP Addresses, James Aldridge, 02:50
- First bit of IP Addresses, Anshul Jain, 01:10
- First bit of IP Addresses, Anshul Jain, 01:00
- [VOIP] Security, B. Elzem Özgürce, 00:30