IETF Discussion (date)
July 31, 2002
- RE: Trees have one root, Christian Huitema, 17:30
- Re: get technical, please? , Re: Trees have one root, Ed Gerck, 15:53
- Re: Troll feeding (was: get technical, please? , Re: Trees have oneroot), Ed Gerck, 15:29
- Re: automated "disambiguation" is resolution in this case, Ed Gerck, 15:14
- RE: get technical, please? , Re: Trees have one root, Mike Burns, 13:44
- Troll feeding (was: get technical, please? , Re: Trees have one root), Paul Hoffman / IMC, 13:34
- Re: automated "disambiguation" is resolution in this case, Ed Gerck, 13:31
- Re: automated "disambiguation" is resolution in this case, Valdis . Kletnieks, 12:40
- Re: automated "disambiguation" is resolution in this case, John Stracke, 12:32
- Re: automated "disambiguation" is resolution in this case, Ed Gerck, 11:50
- Re: Trees have one root, Eric A. Hall, 11:40
- Re: automated "disambiguation" is resolution in this case, Eliot Lear, 11:34
- Re: get technical, please? , Re: Trees have one root, Alex Audu, 11:30
- Re: Trees have one root, Dave Crocker, 11:25
- Re: Trees have one root, Keith Moore, 10:49
- Re: automated "disambiguation" is resolution in this case, Ed Gerck, 10:35
- Re: Trees have one root, Vernon Schryver, 10:31
- Re: automated "disambiguation" is resolution in this case, Eliot Lear, 10:25
- Re: Trees have one root, Keith Moore, 10:14
- Re: Trees have one root, John Stracke, 10:11
- Re: Trees have one root, John Stracke, 10:04
- Re: automated "disambiguation" is resolution in this case, Ed Gerck, 10:00
- Re: Trees have one root, Eric A. Hall, 09:54
- Re: automated "disambiguation" is resolution in this case, Eliot Lear, 09:50
- Re: get technical, please? , Re: Trees have one root, Keith Moore, 09:44
- Re: Trees have one root, Keith Moore, 09:40
- Re: automated "disambiguation" is resolution in this case, Ed Gerck, 09:34
- Re: get technical, please? , Re: Trees have one root, Ed Gerck, 09:30
- Re: Trees have one root, Eric A. Hall, 09:24
- Re: get technical, please? , Re: Trees have one root, John Stracke, 09:14
- Re: get technical, please? , Re: Trees have one root, John Stracke, 09:10
- Re: get technical, please? , Re: Trees have one root, John Stracke, 09:04
- Re: get technical, please? , Re: Trees have one root, John Stracke, 09:00
- Re: Trees have one root, Einar Stefferud, 08:54
- Re: get technical, please? , Re: Trees have one root, Aashish Kumar, 08:51
- Re: automated "disambiguation" is resolution in this case, Eliot Lear, 08:44
- Re: get technical, please? , Re: Trees have one root, Michael Froomkin - U.Miami School of Law, 08:40
- Re: get technical, please? , Re: Trees have one root, Keith Moore, 08:34
- Re: Trees have one root, Keith Moore, 08:30
- Re: get technical, please? , Re: Trees have one root, Ed Gerck, 08:24
- Re: Trees have one root, Eric A. Hall, 07:40
- Re: Root Server Load Data? [Was Re: Trees have one root] (fwd), Paul Vixie, 07:10
- Re: yokohame iesg plenary ipv6 panel presentations, Randy Bush, 06:43
- Re: yokohame iesg plenary ipv6 panel presentations, Ronald van der Pol, 04:50
- Re: automated "disambiguation" is resolution in this case, Joe Baptista, 03:02
- automated "disambiguation" is resolution in this case, Eliot Lear, 00:50
- Re: get technical, please? , Re: Trees have one root, Valdis . Kletnieks, 00:10
July 30, 2002
- Re: get technical, please? , Re: Trees have one root, Keith Moore, 22:32
- Re: get technical, please? , Re: Trees have one root, Ed Gerck, 22:25
- Re: get technical, please? , Re: Trees have one root, Keith Moore, 22:05
- Re: get technical, please? , Re: Trees have one root, Ed Gerck, 21:41
- Re: get technical, please? , Re: Trees have one root, ggm, 21:37
- yokohame iesg plenary ipv6 panel presentations, Randy Bush, 21:32
- Re: get technical, please? , Re: Trees have one root, Ed Gerck, 21:26
- Re: get technical, please? , Re: Trees have one root, Peter Deutsch, 21:13
- Re: get technical, please? , Re: Trees have one root, Valdis . Kletnieks, 20:45
- Re: get technical, please? , Re: Trees have one root, Caitlin Bestler, 20:04
- Re: get technical, please? , Re: Trees have one root, Carl Malamud, 19:24
- Re: get technical, please? , Re: Trees have one root, Ed Gerck, 19:09
- Re: get technical, please? , Re: Trees have one root, vinton g. cerf, 18:54
- Re: get technical, please? , Re: Trees have one root, vinton g. cerf, 18:39
- Re: get technical, please? , Re: Trees have one root, Peter Deutsch, 18:25
- Re: Trees have one root, Eric A. Hall, 17:44
- Re: Trees have one root, Eric A. Hall, 17:24
- Re: get technical, please? , Re: Trees have one root, Ed Gerck, 17:15
- RE: Trees have one root, Christian Huitema, 17:11
- Re: Trees have one root, Dave Crocker, 16:59
- Re: get technical, please? , Re: Trees have one root, vinton g. cerf, 16:54
- Re: get technical, please? , Re: Trees have one root, Dave Crocker, 16:33
- Re: Trees have one root, Ole J. Jacobsen, 16:24
- Re: Trees have one root, Peter Deutsch, 16:09
- Re: Trees have one root, Eric A. Hall, 16:00
- get technical, please? , Re: Trees have one root, Ed Gerck, 15:54
- Re: Trees have one root, JFC (Jefsey) Morfin, 15:34
- Re: Trees have one root, JFC (Jefsey) Morfin, 15:30
- Re: Trees have one root, John C Klensin, 15:00
- Re: Trees have one root, Ole J. Jacobsen, 14:53
- Re: Trees have one root, Eric A. Hall, 13:45
- Re: Trees have one root, Keith Moore, 13:12
- Re: Root Server Load Data? [Was Re: Trees have one root], Bill Manning, 12:02
- Re: Trees have one root, John Stracke, 11:51
- Root Server Load Data? [Was Re: Trees have one root], Michael Froomkin - U.Miami School of Law, 11:46
- Re: Trees have one root, Eric A. Hall, 11:41
- Re: Trees have one root, Keith Moore, 11:12
- Re: Trees have one root, Eric A. Hall, 11:03
- Re: Trees have one root, Keith Moore, 10:53
- Re: Trees have one root, Dave Crocker, 10:46
- Re: Trees have one root, Eric A. Hall, 10:44
- Re: Trees have one root, Randy Bush, 10:19
- Re: Trees have one root, Eric A. Hall, 10:04
- Re: Trees have one root, Joe Touch, 10:02
- Re: Trees have one root, John Stracke, 09:56
- Re: Trees have one root, John Stracke, 09:51
- Re: Trees have one root, Keith Moore, 09:41
- Re: Trees have one root, Dave Crocker, 09:32
- Re: Trees have one root, Eric A. Hall, 09:26
- Re: Trees have one root, Keith Moore, 09:06
- Re: Trees have one root, David Conrad, 08:17
- Re: Trees have one root, Valdis . Kletnieks, 08:10
- Re: Trees have one root, Stephen Sprunk, 08:04
- Re: Trees have one root, Eric A. Hall, 06:55
- nomcom call for volunteers, Phil Roberts, 06:50
- Re: delegation mechanism, Re: Trees have one root, Einar Stefferud, 06:46
- Re: Trees have one root, vint cerf, 05:15
- Re: Trees have one root, vint cerf, 05:12
- Re: Trees have one root, John C Klensin, 02:34
- Re: Trees have one root, Einar Stefferud, 02:31
- Re: Trees have one root, Einar Stefferud, 02:24
- Re: Trees have one root, Einar Stefferud, 02:16
- Re: Trees have one root, Einar Stefferud, 02:11
- Re: Trees have one root, John C Klensin, 02:04
- Re: Trees have one root, Einar Stefferud, 02:00
- Re: Trees have one root, JFC (Jefsey) Morfin, 01:55
- Re: DNS multiverse prefixes, Einar Stefferud, 01:51
- Re: Trees have one root, Einar Stefferud, 01:45
- Re: Trees have one root, Einar Stefferud, 01:43
July 29, 2002
- Re: Trees have one root, Joe Touch, 22:50
- Re: Trees have one root, Ole J. Jacobsen, 22:10
- Re: Trees have one root, Valdis . Kletnieks, 21:54
- Re: Trees have one root, Randy Bush, 21:51
- Re: Trees have one root, Peter Deutsch, 21:14
- Re: Trees have one root, John C Klensin, 20:51
- Re: Trees have one root, Peter Deutsch, 19:24
- delegation mechanism, Re: Trees have one root, Ed Gerck, 15:24
- EFF lawsuit auerbach wins, court criticizes ICANN, Gordon Cook, 14:41
- Re: Trees have one root, Richard J. Sexton Ph.D. J.D., 12:14
- Re: Trees have one root, Keith Moore, 11:51
- Re: Trees have one root, David Conrad, 11:25
- Re: DNS multiverse prefixes, Keith Moore, 10:56
- Re: Trees have one root, Valdis . Kletnieks, 09:32
- Re: Trees have one root, Ole J. Jacobsen, 09:26
- Re: Trees have one root, Richard J. Sexton Ph.D. J.D., 09:02
- Re: DNS multiverse prefixes, Vernon Schryver, 07:53
- Re: Trees have one root, Einar Stefferud, 07:23
- Re: please put a subject, Einar Stefferud, 06:45
- DNS multiverse prefixes, Richard J. Sexton Ph.D. J.D., 06:42
- Re: Trees have one root, Michael Mealling, 05:25
- Re: Trees have one root, JFC (Jefsey) Morfin, 03:45
- RE: Trees have one root, Codogno Maurizio, 01:24
- NSRG IAB presentation and slides..., Eliot Lear, 00:30
July 26, 2002
- Re: Multiverse prefix, Caitlin Bestler, 14:51
- Re: please put a subject, Keith Moore, 13:59
- Re: please put a subject, Dave Crocker, 13:40
- DNS multiverse prefix, Richard J. Sexton Ph.D. J.D., 13:23
- Re: please put a subject, Steven M. Bellovin, 12:59
- RE: please put a subject, Tony Hain, 12:30
- please put a subject, Steven Garrett, 10:49
- [no subject], Keith Moore, 10:43
- Re:, Dave Crocker, 10:10
- Re: DNS based URI without any set access semantics?, Bill Fenner, 09:10
- [no subject], Richard Sexton, 09:04
- Re: DNS based URI without any set access semantics?, Michael Mealling, 07:09
- draft-kindberg-tag-uri-01 (Re: DNS based URI without any set access semantics?), Clark C . Evans, 06:59
- Re: DNS based URI without any set access semantics?, Keith Moore, 06:54
- Re: DNS based URI without any set access semantics?, Valdis . Kletnieks, 06:31
July 25, 2002
- YAML URI scheme rough cut, Clark C . Evans, 23:27
- Re: DNS based URI without any set access semantics?, Clark C . Evans, 16:23
- Re: DNS based URI without any set access semantics?, Keith Moore, 15:49
- Re: DNS based URI without any set access semantics?, Keith Moore, 15:29
- Re: DNS based URI without any set access semantics?, Clark C . Evans, 15:23
- Re: DNS based URI without any set access semantics?, Ted Hardie, 14:39
- Re: DNS based URI without any set access semantics?, Valdis . Kletnieks, 14:29
- Re: DNS based URI without any set access semantics?, Keith Moore, 14:24
- Re: DNS based URI without any set access semantics?, Clark C . Evans, 14:04
- Re: DNS based URI without any set access semantics?, Clark C . Evans, 13:54
- Re: DNS based URI without any set access semantics?, Michael Mealling, 13:45
- Re: DNS based URI without any set access semantics?, Clark C . Evans, 13:35
- Re: DNS based URI without any set access semantics?, Clark C . Evans, 13:30
- Re: DNS based URI without any set access semantics?, Michael Mealling, 12:54
- RE: SHA1 source code!!, Foulk, Scott, 12:50
- Re: DNS based URI without any set access semantics?, Keith Moore, 12:44
- Re: DNS based URI without any set access semantics?, Clark C . Evans, 12:30
- Re: DNS based URI without any set access semantics?, Clark C . Evans, 12:25
- Re: DNS based URI without any set access semantics?, Clark C . Evans, 11:23
- Re: DNS based URI without any set access semantics?, Keith Moore, 10:39
- Re: DNS based URI without any set access semantics?, Clark C . Evans, 10:04
- RE: Jabber BOF afterthoughts, Harald Tveit Alvestrand, 09:54
- Re: DNS based URI without any set access semantics?, Michael Mealling, 09:10
- DNS based URI without any set access semantics?, Clark C . Evans, 08:40
- Re: Jabber BOF afterthoughts, Jeremie, 06:44
- RE: NSRG presentation & mailing list address, Jeroen Massar, 05:13
- Re: ECN and ISOC: request for help..., Franck Martin, 04:24
- Re: Windows NT to Windows 2000 Migration, Pekka Savola, 04:12
- Windows NT to Windows 2000 Migration, Maneesh_Sharma, 03:50
July 24, 2002
- Re: ECN and ISOC: request for help..., Theodore Ts'o, 22:43
- RE: ECN and ISOC: request for help..., Randy Bush, 22:29
- Re: SHA1 source code!!, Donald Eastlake 3rd, 20:34
- SHA1 source code!!, chintan sheth, 19:33
- ECN and now Path MTU discovery, Franck Martin, 18:23
- Re: NSRG presentation & mailing list address, J. Noel Chiappa, 18:14
- Re: NSRG presentation & mailing list address, David J. Aronson, 18:04
- RE: ECN and ISOC: request for help..., Franck Martin, 18:01
- Re: NSRG presentation & mailing list address, Sandy Wills, 15:29
- RE: ECN and ISOC: request for help..., Gary E. Miller, 14:24
- Re: NSRG presentation & mailing list address, David J. Aronson, 13:24
- RE: Jabber BOF afterthoughts, Dave Crocker, 12:14
- Re: Jabber BOF afterthoughts, Richard Shockey, 11:53
- NSRG presentation & mailing list address, Eliot Lear, 11:49
- RE: Jabber BOF afterthoughts, Peterson, Jon, 11:31
- Re: how to take minutes, Caitlin Bestler, 09:01
- ECN Routing, Bill Cunningham, 06:43
- RE: ECN and ISOC: request for help..., Daniel Senie, 06:39
- Re: Jabber BOF afterthoughts, John Stracke, 06:29
- Re: ECN and ISOC: request for help..., jamal, 06:24
- Minutes?, Graham Klyne, 05:59
- Re: how to take minutes, Randy Presuhn, 05:53
- Re: ECN and ISOC: request for help..., Brian E Carpenter, 05:49
- RE: how to take minutes, Linn, John, 05:43
- Re: how to take minutes, Donald Eastlake 3rd, 05:39
- Re: how to take minutes, Dominic Pinto, 05:33
- RE: ECN and ISOC: request for help..., Bill Strahm, 05:23
July 23, 2002
- Re: how to take minutes, Pekka Savola, 22:49
- RE: ECN and ISOC: request for help..., Franck Martin, 22:23
- RE: ECN and ISOC: request for help..., Gary E. Miller, 20:03
- RE: ECN and ISOC: request for help..., Christian Huitema, 19:29
- Re: Jabber BOF afterthoughts, Valdis . Kletnieks, 18:33
- Re: how to take minutes, Scott Brim, 18:29
- ECN and ISOC: request for help..., Franck Martin, 18:14
- how to take minutes, Randy Presuhn, 17:59
- Re: Jabber BOF afterthoughts, Marshall Rose, 16:55
- Re: Jabber BOF afterthoughts, Richard Shockey, 14:35
- Re: Jabber BOF afterthoughts, Graham Klyne, 13:10
- Re: Jabber BOF afterthoughts, Pete Resnick, 12:46
- Re: the way an I-D takes, Fred Baker, 12:12
- Re: Jabber BOF afterthoughts, Randy Bush, 12:07
- Re: Jabber BOF afterthoughts, Randy Bush, 12:02
- Re: Jabber BOF afterthoughts, Marshall Rose, 11:55
- Re: the way an I-D takes, John Stracke, 11:36
- Re: Jabber BOF afterthoughts, John Stracke, 11:32
- Re: Jabber BOF afterthoughts, Randy Bush, 10:43
- Re: Jabber BOF afterthoughts, Graham Klyne, 10:33
- Re: Jabber BOF afterthoughts, Randy Bush, 10:30
- Re: Jabber BOF afterthoughts, Dave Crocker, 10:23
- Re: Jabber BOF afterthoughts, Randy Bush, 10:15
- Re: the way an I-D takes, John Stracke, 10:09
- Re: Jabber BOF afterthoughts, Randy Bush, 10:04
- RE: ARPOP_REQUEST with spoofed IP address (joe, turn it off!), Christian Huitema, 09:40
- Re: Jabber BOF afterthoughts, Pete Resnick, 09:34
- the way an I-D takes, Kai Kretschmann, 09:31
- Re: Jabber BOF afterthoughts, Dave Crocker, 09:10
- Re: Jabber BOF afterthoughts, Randy Bush, 08:29
- Re: ARPOP_REQUEST with spoofed IP address (joe, turn it off!), Caitlin Bestler, 08:25
- Re: ARPOP_REQUEST with spoofed IP address (joe, turn it off!), Vernon Schryver, 07:24
- Re: Jabber BOF afterthoughts, Randall Gellens, 07:00
- Re: ARPOP_REQUEST with spoofed IP address (joe, turn it off!), Lars Eggert, 03:14
July 22, 2002
- Last "organ" message for now, Ole J. Jacobsen, 19:40
- Re: ARPOP_REQUEST with spoofed IP address (joe, turn it off!), Thomas Narten, 12:12
- Re: ARPOP_REQUEST with spoofed IP address (joe, turn it off!), C. M. Heard, 08:42
- Re: ARPOP_REQUEST with spoofed IP address (joe, turn it off!), Matt Crawford, 03:58
July 20, 2002
- Re: ARPOP_REQUEST with spoofed IP address (joe, turn it off!), Joe Touch, 14:40
- Re: Jabber BOF afterthoughts, Dave Crocker, 13:24
- Re: Jabber BOF afterthoughts, Pete Resnick, 11:10
- Re: ARPOP_REQUEST with spoofed IP address (joe, turn it off!), Lars Eggert, 01:29
July 18, 2002
- Watching IETF 54 Sessions Live, Talauliker, Salil Ulhas (UMKC-Student), 13:05
- RE: which standard?, Dan Kohn, 11:31
- Jabber BOF afterthoughts, aki . niemi, 08:26
- Re: which standard?, Pawlukiewicz Jane, 06:40
- Re: (ietf54-noc 1798) why we had wireless problems at IETF, John Stracke, 06:34
July 17, 2002
- Re: (ietf54-noc 1802) Re: why we had wireless problems at IETF, Daniel Senie, 22:29
- Re: (ietf54-noc 1802) Re: why we had wireless problems at IETF, ggm, 22:03
- Re: why we had wireless problems at IETF, ggm, 21:59
- [IETF54] IPv6 demo room, Jun-ichiro itojun Hagino, 21:09
- RE: which standard?, Dan Kohn, 20:23
- Re: (ietf54-noc 1803) Re: why we had wireless problems at IETF, Atsushi Onoe, 20:13
- Re: (ietf54-noc 1798) why we had wireless problems at IETF, Atsushi Onoe, 19:49
- Re: (ietf54-noc 1802) Re: why we had wireless problems at IETF, itojun, 19:43
- Re: why we had wireless problems at IETF, Carsten Bormann, 19:39
- Re: why we had wireless problems at IETF, Joel Jaeggli, 19:33
- why we had wireless problems at IETF, ggm, 19:10
- Re: Multicast Sessions, Michael Richardson, 17:00
- Multicast Sessions, Beard, Cory, 13:04
- which standard?, Pawlukiewicz Jane, 12:51
- hunt for ad-hoc station on plenary., Katsushi Kobayashi, 04:53
- slides for IESG plenary, Jun-ichiro itojun Hagino, 04:39
- Re: Japan Traditional Craft Center, Carl Malamud, 01:54
July 16, 2002
- RE: Deprecating/Amending options on RFC's, Foulk, Scott, 18:53
- ad-hoc terminals are found at #503, Katsushi Kobayashi, 18:50
- Re: Deprecating/Amending options on RFC's, Robert Elz, 17:29
- Re: Last Call: Internationalizing Domain Names In Applications (IDNA) to Proposed Standard, Graham Klyne, 17:23
- Japan Traditional Craft Center, Craig Partridge, 16:59
- Deprecating/Amending options on RFC's, Foulk, Scott, 16:10
- Re: Last Call: Internationalizing Domain Names In Applications (IDNA) to Proposed Standard, Keith Moore, 10:24
- Re: Last Call: Internationalizing Domain Names In Applications (IDNA) to Proposed Standard, Graham Klyne, 09:11
- dead company day details, Craig Partridge, 01:04
July 15, 2002
- Re: 802.11b access in Tokyo and Kyoto with IP mobility, Joel Jaeggli, 19:13
- Re: IETF Meeting Broadcast information..., Joel Jaeggli, 18:59
- Thank you, Ole -- Pipe Organ Event, Dave Crocker, 18:39
- [IETF54] keep rooms clean, Jun-ichiro itojun Hagino, 16:29
- RE: [Sipping] additional optional parameters for translation {ISU P to SIP}, a c, 14:34
- Re: Speaking about experiments in a live network..., Jeff Pulver, 09:44
- Re: Speaking about experiments in a live network..., Matt Crawford, 09:09
- Re: IETF Meeting Broadcast information..., Matt Crawford, 09:00
- RE: [Sipping] additional optional parameters for translation {ISU P to SIP}, Adam Roach, 08:34
- Re: 802.11b access in Tokyo and Kyoto with IP mobility, Phil Karn, 08:29
- Re: 802.11b access in Tokyo and Kyoto with IP mobility, David R. Oran, 08:24
- RE: virus seems to be dangerous, Viren Mantri, 07:54
- Re: Your password!, David Frascone, 05:34
- Re: Your password!, bin, 04:44
- Re: Your password!, Jonny, 02:37
- [IETF54] IPv6 instability, itojun, 00:40
July 14, 2002
- Speaking about experiments in a live network..., Carsten Bormann, 23:04
- Re: joe, turn it off!, Joe Touch, 22:24
- Re: joe, turn it off!, Randy Bush, 22:14
- Re: joe, turn it off!, Joe Touch, 22:00
- Re: joe, turn it off!, Randy Bush, 21:51
- Re: joe, turn it off!, Joe Touch, 21:42
- joe, turn it off!, Randy Bush, 21:23
- Dave Clark on Mars, Timothy J. Salo, 19:33
- dead companies day in Thursday, Craig Partridge, 19:24
- Re: Final Reminder: Pipe Organ Event Monday @ 1800, Ole J. Jacobsen, 18:59
- PGP Key Signing Meeting at the 54th IETF in Yokohama, Jeffrey I. Schiller, 18:54
- IETF Meeting Broadcast information..., Joel Jaeggli, 17:41
- Re: Final Reminder: Pipe Organ Event Monday @ 1800, RL 'Bob' Morgan, 17:14
- mbone is stillborn, news at 11, Michael Richardson, 10:44
- Final Reminder: Pipe Organ Event Monday @ 1800, Ole J. Jacobsen, 07:25
- Re: E-bone collapse, vint cerf, 03:10
- Re: 802.11b access in Tokyo and Kyoto with IP mobility, Fred Baker, 01:25
July 12, 2002
- Re: Bernie Ebbers - Worldcom, Randy Bush, 13:26
- Re: Bernie Ebbers - Worldcom, J. Noel Chiappa, 10:24
- Bernie Ebbers - Worldcom, Dan Kolis, 09:00
- Re: E-bone collapse, Dominic Pinto, 08:39
- 802.11b access in Tokyo and Kyoto with IP mobility, Masataka Ohta, 01:44
- Re: E-bone collapse, Dominic Pinto, 00:29
- Re: E-bone collapse, Dominic Pinto, 00:14
July 11, 2002
- Re: E-bone collapse, vint cerf, 22:00
- E-bone collapse, Bill Cunningham, 19:43
- E-bone collapse, Bill Cunningham, 18:34
- Re: additional optional parameters for translation {ISUP to SIP}, Harald Alvestrand, 05:50
- additional optional parameters for translation {ISUP to SIP}, a c, 05:05
July 08, 2002
- Re: Last Call: An IETF URN Sub-namespace for Registered Protocol Parameters to BCP, Keith Moore, 14:34
- Re: Last Call: SMTP Service Extension for Content Negotiation to Proposed Standard, John Stracke, 08:49
- Re: Last Call: An IETF URN Sub-namespace for Registered Protocol Parameters to BCP, Harald Alvestrand, 08:29
- Re: Last Call: SMTP Service Extension for Content Negotiation to Proposed Standard, John Stracke, 08:23
- Re: Last Call: An IETF URN Sub-namespace for Registered Protocol Parameters to BCP, Michael Mealling, 08:13
- Re: Pursuing question of mime types in W3C specifications and nextactions, Chris Lilley, 08:09
- revisions to draft-ietf-fax-esmtp-conneg-02.txt, Toyoda, Kiyoshi, 08:02
- Semi-off topic for IETF 54: Hand drums, Spencer Dawkins, 07:39
- Re: Last Call: SMTP Service Extension for Content Negotiation to Proposed Standard, Robert A. Rosenberg, 07:29
- RE: Last Call: SMTP Service Extension for Content Negotiation to Proposed Standard, Robert A. Rosenberg, 07:24
- Re: Last Call: SMTP Service Extension for Content Negotiation to Proposed Standard, Brian Stafford, 07:13
- RE: Last Call: SMTP Service Extension for Content Negotiation to Proposed Standard, Gerry Sancataldo, 07:09
- Re: Last Call: SMTP Service Extension for Content Negotiation to Proposed Standard, Keith Moore, 07:03
- RE: Last Call: SMTP Service Extension for Content Negotiation to Proposed Standard, Robert A. Rosenberg, 06:59
- Re: Last Call: SMTP Service Extension for Content Negotiation to Proposed Standard, Robert A. Rosenberg, 06:53
- Rejected posting to STRUMING(_at_)EMAIL(_dot_)RUTGERS(_dot_)EDU, L-Soft list server at EMAIL.RUTGERS.EDU (1.8d), 06:49
- RE: Last Call: SMTP Service Extension for Content Negotiation to Proposed Standard, Gerry Sancataldo, 06:43
- Re: Pursuing question of mime types in W3C specifications and nextactions, Dan Connolly, 06:41
July 07, 2002
- Re: Last Call: SMTP Service Extension for Content Negotiation to Proposed Standard, Dave Crocker, 14:59
- Re: Last Call: SMTP Service Extension for Content Negotiation to Proposed Standard, Keith Moore, 14:39
- Re: Pursuing question of mime types in W3C specifications and nextactions, ned . freed, 11:54
- RE: Last Call: SMTP Service Extension for Content Negotiation toP roposed Standard, Dave Crocker, 11:29
- Question ... what is going on in Europe with the backbone?, Richard Shockey, 09:49
- Re: Last Call: SMTP Service Extension for Content Negotiation to Proposed Standard, John C Klensin, 07:24
July 04, 2002
- Re: Last Call: SMTP Service Extension for Content Negotiation to Proposed Standard, Keith Moore, 23:50
- Re[2]: Last Call: SMTP Service Extension for Content Negotiation toP roposed Standard, Gene Gaines, 14:24
- Re: Last Call: SMTP Service Extension for Content Negotiation to Proposed Standard, Dave Crocker, 13:39
- Re: Last Call: SMTP Service Extension for Content Negotiation toP roposed Standard, Michael Richardson, 12:43
- Re: Last Call: SMTP Service Extension for Content Negotiation to Proposed Standard, John C Klensin, 12:39
- Re: Last Call: SMTP Service Extension for Content Negotiation to Proposed Standard, John C Klensin, 12:30
- Re: Last Call: SMTP Service Extension for Content Negotiation to Proposed Standard, Valdis . Kletnieks, 09:35
July 03, 2002
- Re: Last Call: SMTP Service Extension for Content Negotiation to Proposed Standard, Valdis . Kletnieks, 23:43
- Re: Last Call: SMTP Service Extension for Content Negotiation to Proposed Standard, ned . freed, 23:39
- Re: Last Call: SMTP Service Extension for Content Negotiation to Proposed Standard, Dave Crocker, 23:34
- Re: Last Call: SMTP Service Extension for Content Negotiation to Proposed Standard, Dave Crocker, 23:30
- Re: Last Call: SMTP Service Extension for Content Negotiation to Proposed Standard, John C Klensin, 22:29
- Re: Last Call: SMTP Service Extension for Content Negotiation to Proposed Standard, ned . freed, 21:59
- Re: Last Call: SMTP Service Extension for Content Negotiation to Proposed Standard, Valdis . Kletnieks, 21:53
- Re: Last Call: SMTP Service Extension for Content Negotiation to Proposed Standard, ned . freed, 21:35
- Re: Last Call: SMTP Service Extension for Content Negotiation to Proposed Standard, ned . freed, 20:52
- Re: Last Call: SMTP Service Extension for Content Negotiation to Proposed Standard, Dave Crocker, 20:29
- Re: Last Call: SMTP Service Extension for Content Negotiation to Proposed Standard, Dave Crocker, 20:13
- Re: Last Call: SMTP Service Extension for Content Negotiation to Proposed Standard, John C Klensin, 19:18
- Re: Last Call: SMTP Service Extension for Content Negotiation to Proposed Standard, John C Klensin, 19:16
- Re: Last Call: An IETF URN Sub-namespace for Registered Protocol Parameters to BCP, Graham Klyne, 19:00
- Re: Last Call: SMTP Service Extension for Content Negotiation to Proposed Standard, Graham Klyne, 18:28
- Re: Last Call: SMTP Service Extension for Content Negotiation to Proposed Standard, Robert A. Rosenberg, 18:24
- Re: Last Call: An IETF URN Sub-namespace for Registered Protocol Parameters to BCP, Keith Moore, 17:36
- RE: Last Call: SMTP Service Extension for Content Negotiation toP roposed Standard, COLES, RICHARD J. (JSC-EV) (LM), 16:23
- Re: Last Call: SMTP Service Extension for Content Negotiation to Proposed Standard, Keith Moore, 16:06
- RE: Last Call: SMTP Service Extension for Content Negotiation toP roposed Standard, COLES, RICHARD J. (JSC-EV) (LM), 16:03
- Re: Last Call: SMTP Service Extension for Content Negotiation to Proposed Standard, ned . freed, 15:21
- Re: Pursuing question of mime types in W3C specifications and nextactions, Mark Baker, 15:16
- Re: Last Call: SMTP Service Extension for Content Negotiation to Proposed Standard, Keith Moore, 14:48
- RE: Last Call: SMTP Service Extension for Content Negotiation toP roposed Standard, ned . freed, 14:46
- Re: Last Call: SMTP Service Extension for Content Negotiation to Proposed Standard, ned . freed, 14:45
- Re: Last Call: An IETF URN Sub-namespace for Registered Protocol Parameters to BCP, Graham Klyne, 14:36
- Re: Last Call: SMTP Service Extension for Content Negotiation to Proposed Standard, Keith Moore, 14:13
- Re: Last Call: SMTP Service Extension for Content Negotiation to Proposed Standard, ned . freed, 13:40
- Re: Last Call: SMTP Service Extension for Content Negotiation to Proposed Standard, John C Klensin, 12:46
- Re: Please make 3ffe::/16 reverse-delegations under ip6.arpa, Bill Manning, 12:06
- Re: Last Call: An IETF URN Sub-namespace for Registered Protocol Parameters to BCP, Keith Moore, 11:18
- Re: Pursuing question of mime types in W3C specifications and nextactions, Ian B. Jacobs, 07:30
- Re: Please make 3ffe::/16 reverse-delegations under ip6.arpa, Petr Baudis, 07:28
- Re: IPR and I-D boilerplate, Keith Moore, 07:10
- Re: Last Call: SMTP Service Extension for Content Negotiation to Proposed Standard, Keith Moore, 07:04
- Re: Last Call: SMTP Service Extension for Content Negotiation to Proposed Standard, Keith Moore, 06:54
- Re: Last Call: An IETF URN Sub-namespace for Registered Protocol Parameters to BCP, Graham Klyne, 05:10
- Re: Last Call: SMTP Service Extension for Content Negotiation to Proposed Standard, ned . freed, 00:04
July 02, 2002
- Re: Last Call: SMTP Service Extension for Content Negotiation to Proposed Standard, ned . freed, 23:39
- Re: Last Call: SMTP Service Extension for Content Negotiation to Proposed Standard, Robert Elz, 23:35
- Re: Last Call: SMTP Service Extension for Content Negotiation to Proposed Standard, ned . freed, 23:10
- Re: Last Call: SMTP Service Extension for Content Negotiation to Proposed Standard, Keith Moore, 22:30
- Re: Last Call: SMTP Service Extension for Content Negotiation to Proposed Standard, ned . freed, 22:00
- Re: Last Call: An IETF URN Sub-namespace for Registered Protocol Parameters to BCP, Keith Moore, 21:30
- Re: Last Call: An IETF URN Sub-namespace for Registered Protocol Parameters to BCP, Michael Mealling, 21:10
- Re: Last Call: SMTP Service Extension for Content Negotiation to Proposed Standard, Keith Moore, 20:40
- Re: Last Call: SMTP Service Extension for Content Negotiation to Proposed Standard, Keith Moore, 20:29
- Re: Last Call: SMTP Service Extension for Content Negotiation to Proposed Standard, Keith Moore, 20:10
- Re: Last Call: SMTP Service Extension for Content Negotiation to Proposed Standard, Keith Moore, 19:59
- Re: Last Call: SMTP Service Extension for Content Negotiation to Proposed Standard, Dave Crocker, 19:43
- Re: Last Call: SMTP Service Extension for Content Negotiation to Proposed Standard, Keith Moore, 19:23
- IETF54 multicast/unicast, mcmorris(_at_)nycap(_dot_)rr(_dot_)com, 19:13
- Re: Last Call: An IETF URN Sub-namespace for Registered Protocol Parameters to BCP, Keith Moore, 19:04
- Re: Last Call: SMTP Service Extension for Content Negotiation to Proposed Standard, Dave Crocker, 18:15
- Re: Last Call: SMTP Service Extension for Content Negotiation to Proposed Standard, ned . freed, 18:11
- Re: Last Call: SMTP Service Extension for Content Negotiation to Proposed Standard, ned . freed, 17:49
- Re: Last Call: SMTP Service Extension for Content Negotiation to Proposed Standard, Dave Crocker, 17:24
- Re: Last Call: SMTP Service Extension for Content Negotiation to Proposed Standard, John C Klensin, 16:50
- Re: Last Call: SMTP Service Extension for Content Negotiation to Proposed Standard, Alexey Melnikov, 15:06
- Re: Last Call: SMTP Service Extension for Content Negotiation to Proposed Standard, Gregory Neil Shapiro, 11:54
- Re: Please make 3ffe::/16 reverse-delegations under ip6.arpa, Petr Baudis, 11:40
- Reminder: Special events at IETF-54, Ole J. Jacobsen, 10:10
July 01, 2002
- Re: IPR and I-D boilerplate, John C Klensin, 20:11
- Re: IPR and I-D boilerplate, Pekka Savola, 14:49
- Re: IPR and I-D boilerplate, Keith Moore, 14:24
- Re: IPR and I-D boilerplate, Joe Touch, 14:13
- Re: IPR and I-D boilerplate, Peter Deutsch, 14:00
- Re: IPR and I-D boilerplate, Keith Moore, 11:53
- Re: IPR and I-D boilerplate, Peter Deutsch, 09:44
- Re: IPR and I-D boilerplate, Peter Deutsch, 09:34
- Re: Pursuing question of mime types in W3C specifications and nextactions, Keith Moore, 09:03
- Re: IPR and I-D boilerplate, Joe Touch, 08:31
- RE: Pursuing question of mime types in W3C specifications and nextactions, John Stracke, 07:54
- Re: Pursuing question of mime types in W3C specifications and nextactions, Chris Lilley, 07:11
- RE: IPR and I-D boilerplate, graham . travers, 02:25