Re: Palladium (TCP/MS)



--On Tuesday, October 22, 2002 08:52:17 -0500 Stephen Sprunk
<ssprunk(_at_)cisco(_dot_)com> wrote:

Microsoft's application protocols (e.g. CIFS aka NetBIOS, Kerberos) are
certainly problematic, but I've heard no complaints about their IP stack
in several years.


Also, this entire paranoia stems AFAICT from the fact that it in XP (as
opposed to earlier Windows releases) is possible to open raw sockets. Wow,
what a security problem. 

-- 
Måns Nilsson    http://vvv.besserwisser.org

<Prev in Thread]	Current Thread	[Next in Thread>
Re: Palladium (TCP/MS), (continued) Re: Palladium (TCP/MS), Valdis . Kletnieks Re: Palladium (TCP/MS), Bill Cunningham Re: Palladium (TCP/MS), Stephen Sprunk RE: Palladium (TCP/MS), Haren Visavadia RE: Palladium (TCP/MS), Einar Stefferud RE: Palladium (TCP/MS), Christian Huitema RE: Palladium (TCP/MS), Haren Visavadia Re: RE: Palladium (TCP/MS), Chris Evans Re: Palladium (TCP/MS), Eliot Lear Re: Palladium (TCP/MS), Stephen Sprunk Re: Palladium (TCP/MS), Måns Nilsson <= Re: Palladium (TCP/MS), Vernon Schryver Re: [isdf] Re: Palladium (TCP/MS), Robert Moskowitz RE: Palladium (TCP/MS), Haren Visavadia Re: Palladium (TCP/MS), John Stracke RE: Palladium (TCP/MS), Franck Martin Re: [isdf] RE: Palladium (TCP/MS), Gary Lawrence Murphy RE: Palladium (TCP/MS), Caitlin Bestler RE: RE: Palladium (TCP/MS), Sean Jones Re: Palladium (TCP/MS), Valdis . Kletnieks RE: Palladium (TCP/MS), Sean Jones

Previous by Date:	Re: Palladium (TCP/MS), Stephen Sprunk
Next by Date:	Re: Palladium (TCP/MS), Vernon Schryver
Previous by Thread:	Re: Palladium (TCP/MS), Stephen Sprunk
Next by Thread:	Re: Palladium (TCP/MS), Vernon Schryver
Indexes:	[Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]