I sometimes put the working group name on drafts also. But an RFC is
never issued by a working group. It is issued by the I* after IESG
review and usually after IETF Last Call. I'm dubious about putting the
WG name in the RFC but if that were done, it shouldn't be more than an
Donald E. Eastlake 3rd
155 Beaver Street +1-508-634-2066(h) +1-508-851-8280(w)
Milford, MA 01757 USA
On Tue, 11 Mar 2003, Scott W Brim wrote:
Date: Tue, 11 Mar 2003 09:17:05 -0500
From: Scott W Brim <sbrim(_at_)cisco(_dot_)com>
Subject: Re: Network Working Group
On Mon, Mar 10, 2003 12:16:45PM -0800, Fred Baker allegedly wrote:
I personally would like to see us stop attributing documents to them.
The world has long since moved on, and those who don't recognize it
I stopped using it on drafts a few years ago. I use the relevant WG.