On 6/18/2003 1:18 PM, Melinda Shore wrote:
We're doing it.
.......the real problem is that many people bringing new
work to the IETF don't know how to accept being told "no"
and it leads to harass-a-thons of the IESG on the one hand
and dubious work on the other.
Primarily, folks want to use it as in
"Ethernet-over-MPLS". That may not necessarily go down
well with you either, but think of MPLS as a logical FR.
I think we need to retain a focus on connectionless,
packet-oriented delivery and how to build on that. I wonder
if we aren't going considerably astray with the growing
emphasis on pseudo-circuits.
Again, I agree and support.