On Tue December 16 2003 21:45, Franck Martin wrote:
It was replied to me a lot of technical reasons on how I could
filter otherwise. But I'm a human and I like to see it is an [ietf]
I see that it is an IETF mail by seeing that it got routed into my IETF
folder. (It gets there by my filters checking whether Sender is
On the other claw, sometimes I have to get my mail over the web, in
which case the folder routing rules haven't been applied. For this
reason, I'd support a *short* tag, such as "[ietf]". To those who
bitch about the waste of bits: clamp down on topic drift, large
signatures, unnecessary headers (including spam-detection hints!), etc.
etc. etc. first!
Dave Aronson, Senior Software Engineer, Secure Software Inc.
(Opinions above NOT those of securesw.com unless so stated!)
Email me at: work (D0T) 2004 (@T) dja (D0T) mailme (D0T) org
Web: http://destined.to/program http://listen.to/davearonson