-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Harald Tveit Alvestrand wrote:
| the reason the secretariat is doing this in stages is exactly because we
| want to see how big the false-positive issue is.
| I currently personally use Mailman 2.60 with Bayesian filtering and
| close-to-default rules; it seems to run at a very low rate of false
In my experience lots of false positives from spamassassin+bayesian
is the result of the user making false assumptions about the linearity
of the spamassassin point-scale.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.0.7 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----