--On 5. juni 2004 16:13 -0700 Dave Crocker <dhc2(_at_)dcrocker(_dot_)net> wrote:
This means that you are proceeding with the changes.
No. It means that we need to make a plan for those changes.
You can't review what isn't there. My bad wording.
Forgive my inattention, but where is a copy of the specific plan that
was reviewed and approved by the IETF for these structural changes, and
when did the IETF approve it?
Leslie's message of May 26 was more accurate than mine.
Was there any piece of information you felt was missing in that message?
A separate question: To what extent is this effort taking already-scarce
IETF resources and serving as a distraction from making the IETF produce
better material in a more timely fashion?
NEWTRK, ICAR, EDU and the PROTO efforts all have capable leaders who are
not critical-path resources for the AdminRest effort.
I believe that the AdminRest activities are, in the long run, critical for
making it possible for the IETF to produce better material in a timely
fashion. So I'm devoting considerable time to it, as is Leslie.
I believe we are making the best use of resources that we can make based on
our judgment. If you have a specific suggestion to make, make it.
Harald
_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf