Dave Crocker wrote:
The IETF is choosing ISOC to do a job. The IETF is specifying
the job. If the IETF does not like the job that ISOC is doing,
the IETF will get someone else to do it.
And you think that isn't called "contractor"?
What label would you use? And how does it describe something
different from contracting?
How about "parent organization"?
But all this does lead to the thought that a basic (inter-)
organizational chart would be helpful, showing who reports to
whom in terms of giving direction and making hire/fire decisions.
Ietf mailing list