Dave Crocker wrote:
By way of noting one possible scanario that builds on today's
reality and leads down a path that never adopts IPv6,
As of today this _is_ the scenario. IPv6 is not even a buzzword anymore.
I'll ask: What if users turned all leaf networks into private
address space, so that public IPv4 numbers were needed only at
the level of roughly 1 per public interface?
I don't think the question if "what if", the question is when. NAT will
be improved, procotols that don't cross NAT nicely will suffer to the
expense of those that do cross NAT nicely.
This is, of course, the ultimate breakage of the end-to-end
addressing model, but we tend to forget that the model is
something rather esoteric to non-protocol geeks.
Indeed. Non-protocol geeks care about features, not about elegance.
At the least, it means we had better have an end-to-end
reference (identification) construct that is a) separate
from IP Address,
This might be too ambitious, as the infrastructure required to deliver
the ID-to-LOC mapping might represent more trouble that accommodating
the identifier being in the same name space as the locator.
And now we try to characterize the minimal deployment of IPv6 as
if it represented success. Or perhaps the real problem was that
what has been happening with NATs, et al, is fine but we that
have preferred to tout our idealized solution and ignored
market pragmatics.
I could not agree more. People have deployed NAT it solved problems, not
because of address scarcity. Instead of acknowledging their needs we
have repeatedly told them that their solution sucks. It has not
prevented them to do more NAT, and it works better and better. I wonder
how many years of double-NAT IPv4 we will have to support before we
acknowledge the failure of IPv6 and begin the work on a replacement that
actually addresses people's needs at a cost they can afford, not
protocol designer dreams.
Michel.
_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf