Peter(_dot_)lewis(_at_)upperside(_dot_)fr has already been denied posting rights on at least
one IETF WG mailing list because of this behaviour.
Is it time to dig out RFC 3683/BCP 83?
BTW - has anyone, anywhere ever seen a response from him/them when they
have been asked to stop spamming the IETF lists?
Harald
--On onsdag, desember 15, 2004 17:35:11 -0800 Thomas Gal
<ThomasGal(_at_)LumenVox(_dot_)com> wrote:
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Harald and community,
Observation/Comment from a concerned member. I've never really
complained about anything before, but if I search over the last couple of
months (I did a searchback to Oct 1) across the following mailing lists to
which I'm subscribed:
XCON,AVT,IPSEC,IPTEL,SIP,SIPPING,MMUSIC etc
I get notices from Peter Lewis and Gunther Palmer, sometimes I get
5+ copies of these notices. For example I have 11 notices about the summer
'05 wimax summit in paris france that I haven't deleted floating around my
mailbox! 5 Just today between SIMPLE,XCON,SIPPING,MMUSIC, and SIP!!!!! Who
knows how many more went out. I thought this was a little bit
unacceptable(I'm trying to be polite for some reason I guess) as the IETF
itself has 1 announce list for announcing things, and as far as I'm
concerned this is basically spam. I sent a message on November 11th which
is attached basically saying to the principals of this organization that:
- -I'm receiving multiple notices,
- -think it's unreasonable,
- -the people sending the notices are not participants on the lists so are
clearly exploiting the mailing list
- -that the IETF has an announce list which they should work out
appropriate submission and distribution through, as I'm sure that IETF
memebers would in fact like to be notified of their events, but
appropriately.
I'm copying them on this message again as well, and personally I
feel that if you look at
http://tinyurl.com/6mvnc
- -and-
http://tinyurl.com/452e5
You can see that peter lewis has been sending bulk unsolicited email
through IETF lists for some time, and Gunter Palmer appears to be a new up
and coming distributor.
That said, I never got a response, so I'm inclined to say we should
boot them from IETF mailing lists, and ideally get a response and arrange
to have them submit 1 notice 1 time to go out to the IETF announce list,
or perhaps even a separate list which is specifically for folks wishing to
address the IETF population at large. Certainly only willing participants
to the IETF/IETF announce list should be getting these notices. I do
recall a gentleman mentioning in DC something about coordinating
reasonable official submissions, and I feel this falls in line with that
request. There's enough of a problem with spam that we can't do anything
about, and I think dealing with this situation properly could have the
potential to not only reduce some junk mail, but also allow that
information to go out in an appropriate fashion to willing recipients,
and perhaps educate some people (who's company supposedly caters to
technology folk) along the way of proper edicate for such matters. And if
they don't respond, who cares, just boot em and let them suffer the
consequences.
Perhaps comments from a few more IETF folk could establish that this
crap is not welcome, or is it just me?
And to the principals of this orgnaization. Who are you to not
respond to something like this? This is very indicative of pathetic
business practices, and makes me inclined to say bad things about your
organizations morals, and the organization itself, and frankly the people
on top who don't respond as well. Don't you realize that the people who
get the most spam and are more annoyed than anyone by it are the audience
you supposedly are catering to?
- -Tom
thomasgal(_at_)lumenvox(_dot_)com
-----Original Message-----
From: sip-bounces(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org [mailto:sip-bounces(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org]
On
Behalf Of Gunter
Sent: Wednesday, December 15, 2004 6:28 AM
To: sip(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org
Subject: [Sip] WiMAX Summit'05 - Paris - France
. What is the business model for WiMAX?
. What do we learn from earlier deployments?
. What about the future extensions of the standard?
. How is addressed the interoperability challenge?
These questions, among others, will be addressed during the
second edition of the WiMAX Summit to be organised in Paris
next 5-8 April 2005.
Get all details at:
http://www.upperside.fr/wimax05/wimax2005intro.htm
<http://www.upperside.fr/wimax05/wimax2005intro.htm>
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
iQA/AwUBQcDmA+q9bQOx/5ayEQLGFACeLMNxzQyiRwgB0n5KdxPHD0s3LxAAnRcl
NfKI62xgIbF44qYivQyJ4Dmj
=IY/A
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf