ietf
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: Issue: #751: Section 7 - Removability, using term "BCP"

2004-12-21 16:21:06
On Tue, Dec 21, 2004 09:19:12PM +0100, Wijnen, Bert (Bert) allegedly wrote:
See: https://rt.psg.com/Ticket/Display.html?id=751

The text suggested by Scott would mean to change:

   Removability: While there is no current plan to transfer the legal
      and financial home of the IASA to another corporation, the IASA
      shall be structured to enable a clean transition in the event that
      the IETF community decides, through BCP publication, that such a
      transition is required.

into:

   Removability: While there is no current plan to transfer the legal
      and financial home of the IASA to another corporation, the IASA
      shall be structured to enable a clean transition in the event that
      the IETF community decides, through the publication of a 
      procedure document where a formal assertion of IETF consensus 
      is required (currently called BCP), that such a
      transition is required.
 
I find that latter sentence harder to read, but I can live with it.

I saw Scott (as only one) in favor of the change, while at least 2 people 
(Harald and Sam) objected. Not clear what I should do.
Unless instructed otherwise, I will leave the text alone.

Bert

It is harder to read.  I suggest:

  ... shall be structured to enable a clean transition in the event that
  the IETF community decides that such a transition is required and
  documents its consensus in a formal document (currently called a BCP).

_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>