ietf
[Top] [All Lists]

RE: Consensus? Minor issue #730: Section 2.2 - Authority over st andards development

2004-12-22 06:18:35
Inline

-----Original Message-----
From: ietf-bounces(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org 
[mailto:ietf-bounces(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org]On Behalf Of
Harald Tveit Alvestrand
Sent: Wednesday, December 22, 2004 10:49
To: ietf(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org
Subject: Consensus? Minor issue #730: Section 2.2 - Authority over
standards development


Old text:

2. The IAD, IAOC and ISOC shall not have any authority over the IETF
standards development activities.

Issue: ISOC already has a role in IETF standards development 
activities.

Suggested new text:

2. The IAD and IAC shall not have any authority over the IETF
standards development activities, and this document does not
confer any new authority or responsibilities to ISOC regarding
IETF standards development.

Resolution:

Slight modification of the suggested text:

2. The IAD and IAOC shall not have any authority over the IETF
standards development activities. This document does not
modify ISOC's other roles related to the IETF standars process.

(Reason: This doc neither expands nor contracts the existing 
responsbilities)

OK?

fine. And I will fix s/standars/standards/

Bert
               Harald


_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf


_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
  • RE: Consensus? Minor issue #730: Section 2.2 - Authority over st andards development, Wijnen, Bert (Bert) <=