RE: draft-phillips-langtags-08, process, sp ecifications, "stability", and extensions
2005-01-06 10:24:12
On Thu, 06 Jan 2005 11:04:54 -0500, John C Klensin wrote:
Peter, as soon as we get to "valid concerns that deserve
attention", we remove the proposed document, I believe, as a
candidate for BCP.
That pretty much applies to all specifications. A Last Call that produces any
sort of serious "concern" that folks feel should be taken seriously means that
the document is not yet ready for approval.
It occurs to me that a Last Call for an independent submission has an added
requirement to satisfy, namely that the community supports adoption of the
work. We take a working group as a demonstration of community support.
(However we used to pressure for explicit statements during Last Call.) My
feeling is that an independent submission MUST show significant support during
Last Call.
In other words, a working group document getting IETF Last Call has something
of a Default Yes. And independent submission needs to be Default No.
And, indeed, I haven't seen much support for the document under discussion.
d/
--
Dave Crocker
Brandenburg InternetWorking
+1.408.246.8253
dcrocker a t ...
WE'VE MOVED to: www.bbiw.net
_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf
<Prev in Thread] |
Current Thread |
[Next in Thread>
|
- RE: draft-phillips-langtags-08, process, sp ecifications, "stability", and extensions, Peter Constable
- RE: draft-phillips-langtags-08, process, sp ecifications, "stability", and extensions, Peter Constable
- RE: draft-phillips-langtags-08, process, sp ecifications, "stability", and extensions, Peter Constable
- RE: draft-phillips-langtags-08, process, sp ecifications, "stability", and extensions, John C Klensin
- RE: draft-phillips-langtags-08, process, sp ecifications, "stability", and extensions,
Dave Crocker <=
- Re: draft-phillips-langtags-08, process, sp ecifications, "stability", and extensions, Scott W Brim
- individual submission Last Call -- default yes/no., Dave Crocker
- Re: individual submission Last Call -- default yes/no., Harald Tveit Alvestrand
- Re: individual submission Last Call -- default yes/no., John C Klensin
- Re: individual submission Last Call -- default yes/no., Dave Crocker
- Re: individual submission Last Call -- default yes/no., JFC (Jefsey) Morfin
- Re: individual submission Last Call -- default yes/no., Tom Petch
- Re: individual submission Last Call -- default yes/no., Ted Hardie
- Re: individual submission Last Call -- default yes/no., JFC (Jefsey) Morfin
- Re: individual submission Last Call -- default yes/no., Dave Crocker
|
Previous by Date: |
Re: draft-phillips-langtags-08, process, specifications, "stability", and extensions, Harald Tveit Alvestrand |
Next by Date: |
Re: draft-phillips-langtags-08, process, sp ecifications, "stability", and extensions, Mark Davis |
Previous by Thread: |
RE: draft-phillips-langtags-08, process, sp ecifications, "stability", and extensions, John C Klensin |
Next by Thread: |
Re: draft-phillips-langtags-08, process, sp ecifications, "stability", and extensions, Scott W Brim |
Indexes: |
[Date]
[Thread]
[Top]
[All Lists] |
|
|