I did a quick read of version -06 of the IASA BCP this morning. I'll
do a more in depth review later this week, but in the meantime there
is one issue that jumped out at me. The document says:
In no circumstances may the IAB or
ISOC Board of Trustees overturn a decision of the IAOC that involves
a binding contract or overturn a personnel-related action (such as
hiring, firing, promotion, demotion, performance reviews, salary
adjustments, etc.).
This is, IMO, incorrect. It could be corrected by:
s/IAB or ISOC Board of Trustees/IAB
The original text I proposed said IESG or IAB, because they were both
in the appeals path. Somehow, in removing the IESG from the appeals
path, we seem to have added the ISOC Board to this paragraph.
Not that I expect it to be done very often (if at all), but it is the
nature of a not-for-profit corporate structure that the Board of
Trustees has fiduciary responsibility for all activities of the
corporation. So, I don't think personally think that the document
should say that "in no circumstances" shall the ISOC board overturn
certain types of decisions by the IAOC. In the extremely unlikely
event that the IAOC took a decision that was illegal or that would
bring substantial liability to the company, the ISOC Board might need
to overturn it.
Margaret
_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf