ned(_dot_)freed(_at_)mrochek(_dot_)com wrote:
...
That assumes we care about moving stuff to DS. That wasn't at all
obvious during the discussion of 2774 and is by no means obvious
in the newtrk discussions.
The often-heard plaint that "nobody cares about moving to DS or S" has
always
struck me as confusing cause with effect. Like it or not, the message we
send
by doing things like close WGs the moment their docs come out at
proposed, by
setting the bar for rechartering groups to deal with DS issues quite
high, and
in many others ways says to people that "worrying about DS is a waste of
time". Change the message we send and people will start to care; don't
change it and
they won't. Pretty simple, really.
Ned
Oh, that's true enough. So we need newtrk to reach a consensus on
what the message should be. I have a radical personal view on that,
but that discussion belongs on the newtrk list.
Brian
_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf