On 6/9/05, Brian E Carpenter <brc(_at_)zurich(_dot_)ibm(_dot_)com> wrote:
It's not illogical - if your source file says
<rfc ipr='full3667'...> you get exactly what you asked for, i.e. the
obsolete boilerplate. The id-nits tool will warn you - it is
well worth running that before submitting *any* I-D, whether produced
by xml2rfc or another method.
Another tool that is worth running on the xml source before using
xml2rfc on it is at http://rtg.ietf.org/~fenner/ietf/xml2rfc-valid/ ;
it will check that the source is well-formed and valid according to
the DTD (XML generated outside of a validating editor is often not
valid, and sometimes even not well-formed, even though xml2rfc creates
a fine-looking document from it), and also checks for various other
errors including the IPR requested.
Bill
_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf