On Saturday, June 11, 2005 10:23:34 AM -0400 John C Klensin
<john-ietf(_at_)jck(_dot_)com> wrote:
--On Friday, 10 June, 2005 23:13 -0700 Ole Jacobsen
<ole(_at_)cisco(_dot_)com> wrote:
Remember last time you registered for an IETF meeting?
Does this ring a bell at all?
http://www.unixwiz.net/ndos-shame.html
On the other hand, while the IETF site gets at least this right,
the majority of the listed sites that I'm checked or used also
manage to believe that "+" can't appear in an email local-part,
etc.
I don't use many of the sites on that list, but I've certainly found plenty
of sites over the years that don't like '+'. Once upon a time, many of
these would inexplicably permit '=', to the extent that it has become
common to parse '+' and '=' the same way.
At least I have the good fortune to have an address that is unambiguous
even without the '+'....
-- Jeff
_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf