On Wed, 3 Aug 2005, Steven M. Bellovin wrote:
In message
<20050803104444(_dot_)GC16624(_at_)login(_dot_)ecs(_dot_)soton(_dot_)ac(_dot_)uk>,
Tim Chown writes:
On Wed, Aug 03, 2005 at 12:38:28PM +0200, Joerg Ott wrote:
What do other people think?
Add an extra 15 mins for lunch, it makes it so less 'rushed'.
That would be a very good idea.
Personally, I don't see much need for lengthening the lunch; having
the break at 1.5 hrs makes the lunch (hopefully) more focused at the
essentials (gather the company quickly; find food _close_ by; order;
talk; eat; get back).
But regardless of that, IMHO the breaks could be reduced to 15 mins or
so. That would allow us at least 2-3 additional 1hr slots, which
would probably be very useful due to numerous scheduling conflicts at
least I've experienced.
--
Pekka Savola "You each name yourselves king, yet the
Netcore Oy kingdom bleeds."
Systems. Networks. Security. -- George R.R. Martin: A Clash of Kings
_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf