Brian E Carpenter wrote:
Peter,
Peter Dambier wrote:
Russ Allbery wrote:
Margaret Wasserman <margaret(_at_)thingmagic(_dot_)com> writes:
Other than a few minor issues that are being dealt with in a -43
update,
I don't think that anyone has raised a blocking technical issue with
the
LLMNR specification during this IETF LC. If you (or anyone else) has
intended to raise a blocking technical issue, either with LLMNR itself
or with its ability to coexist with mDNS, please make that clearer to
me.
Sorry I overlooked this:
I dont count 25% of the root server traffic a minor issue.
Can you point to publicly available data about the rate of .local
queries to *all* the root servers (including the anycast servers)?
Brian
Hi Brian,
I would really like to do.
We have been alarmed by ISPs that we did kill some customers applications
and we stopped publishing the ".local" immediately.
From the data gathered by our root-server operators at that moment we
estimate that the traffic for ".local" must have been some 25%
At this moment we have to sort out a couple of things but I promise
we will make our data publicly available soon.
Kind regards,
Peter and Karin Dambier
--
Peter and Karin Dambier
Public-Root
Graeffstrasse 14
D-64646 Heppenheim
+49-6252-671788 (Telekom)
+49-179-108-3978 (O2 Genion)
mail: peter(_at_)peter-dambier(_dot_)de
http://iason.site.voila.fr
http://www.kokoom.com/iason
_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf