In
<Pine(_dot_)LNX(_dot_)4(_dot_)62(_dot_)0512090426220(_dot_)6721(_at_)sokol(_dot_)elan(_dot_)net>
"william(at)elan.net" <william(_at_)elan(_dot_)net> writes:
However SID drafts are going for EXPERIMENTAL status and are NOT purely
documentation of running code but rather IETF sanctioned internet-wide
experiment with possible intention to move to standard if experiment
is successful. In my view, in this case approving experiment with known
bad behavior or that is non-compliant with existing standards makes more
harm them good for IETF.
Indeed, I fail to see the point of running an experiment when it is
known that the algorithm will have to be changed in an incompatible
way before it can advance to the standard track.
Isn't the time to fix the problem now? Before the experiment is run?
-wayne
-------
Sender Policy Framework: http://www.openspf.org/
Archives at http://archives.listbox.com/spf-discuss/current/
To unsubscribe, change your address, or temporarily deactivate your
subscription,
please go to
http://v2.listbox.com/member/?listname=spf-discuss(_at_)v2(_dot_)listbox(_dot_)com