think it has also been claimed that it is sufficiently finished
and mature that IETF ratification and endorsement is needed, but
no real changes are required or desirable.
1. That is not what has been claimed or sought for DKIM. Ever. There
is a world of difference between protecting existing implementations and
seeking "no real changes".
2. This misrepresentation of things has been asserted repeatedly and has
been correctly repeatedly.
3. At this stage, repeating this misrepresentation has taken on the
characteristic of willful distortion.
dcrocker a t ...
WE'VE MOVED to: www.bbiw.net
Ietf mailing list