IETF Discussion (date)
January 31, 2006
- Re: IAB Response to Appeal from [...], JFC (Jefsey) Morfin, 22:20
- Re: Call for input: draft-hartman-mailinglist-experiment-00.txt, Anthony G. Atkielski, 21:59
- Re: Fairness and changing rules, JFC (Jefsey) Morfin, 21:59
- Re: Call for input: draft-hartman-mailinglist-experiment-00.txt, Frank Ellermann, 21:58
- Re: IAB Response to Appeal from [...], Frank Ellermann, 20:58
- Re: I-D ACTION: draft-ash-alt-formats-01.txt, John Levine, 20:55
- Call for input: draft-hartman-mailinglist-experiment-00.txt, Sam Hartman, 20:06
- Re: Fairness and changing rules, Sam Hartman, 19:52
- Re: IAB Response to Appeal from Jefsey Morfin, JFC (Jefsey) Morfin, 19:39
- Re: Fairness and changing rules, Harald Tveit Alvestrand, 19:35
- Re: Fairness and changing rules, Anthony G. Atkielski, 19:34
- Re: IAB Response to Appeal from Jefsey Morfin, Anthony G. Atkielski, 19:16
- Re: I-D ACTION: draft-ash-alt-formats-01.txt, Anthony G. Atkielski, 19:15
- Re: I-D ACTION:draft-ash-alt-formats-01.txt, Anthony G. Atkielski, 19:11
- Fairness and changing rules, Sam Hartman, 18:48
- Re: IAB Response to Appeal from Jefsey Morfin, Harald Tveit Alvestrand, 17:10
- RE: I-D ACTION:draft-ash-alt-formats-01.txt, Joel M. Halpern, 17:05
- Re: "too many notes" -- a modest proposal, Michael Thomas, 16:07
- RE: IAB Response to Appeal from Jefsey Morfin, Gray, Eric, 14:50
- Re: I-D ACTION:draft-ash-alt-formats-01.txt, Frank Ellermann, 14:50
- Re: IAB Response to Appeal from Jefsey Morfin, Bernard Aboba, 14:37
- Re: I-D ACTION: draft-ash-alt-formats-01.txt, John Levine, 13:27
- Re: IAB Response to Appeal from Jefsey Morfin, Leslie Daigle, 13:02
- Re: IAB Response to Appeal from Jefsey Morfin, Sam Hartman, 13:02
- Re: I-D ACTION:draft-ash-alt-formats-01.txt, Sam Hartman, 12:31
- Re: IAB Response to Appeal from Jefsey Morfin, Sam Hartman, 12:12
- IAB Response to Appeal from Jefsey Morfin, Leslie Daigle, 11:49
- urgent dhcp request, Mohammed Tantawi, 09:45
- RE: I-D ACTION:draft-ash-alt-formats-01.txt, Ash, Gerald R \(Jerry\), ALABS, 09:45
- Re: IETF65 hotel location, Keith Moore, 09:00
- learning about real world NGN issues from the Indian questionnaire, JFC (Jefsey) Morfin, 06:10
January 30, 2006
- Re: I-D ACTION:draft-hartman-mailinglist-experiment-00.txt, Sam Hartman, 18:28
- Re: IETF65 hotel location, JORDI PALET MARTINEZ, 12:54
- Re: IETF65 hotel location, Joel Jaeggli, 12:11
- Re: IETF65 hotel location, Daniel Senie, 12:00
- Re: IETF65 hotel location, Dave Crocker, 11:47
- Re: IETF65 hotel location, John Levine, 10:29
- Re: IETF65 hotel location, Bob Braden, 10:27
- Re: Interim meetings planning [was Softwires Interim Meeting], JORDI PALET MARTINEZ, 10:26
- Re: Meeting Survey Results, JORDI PALET MARTINEZ, 09:59
- RE: IETF65 hotel location, Gray, Eric, 09:54
- Re: IETF65 hotel location, Marshall Eubanks, 09:05
- RE: IETF65 hotel location, Ed Juskevicius, 07:04
- Finding issue trackers for drafts, Elwyn Davies, 04:45
January 29, 2006
- Re: IETF65 hotel location, Dave Crocker, 19:33
- Re: IETF65 hotel location, Brian E Carpenter, 18:12
- Re: IETF65 hotel location, Ole Jacobsen, 17:02
- Re: IETF65 hotel location, lconroy, 12:00
- One IETF related Workshop informaiton,, DENG, HUI -HCHBJ, 05:56
January 27, 2006
- Re: Weekly posting summary for ietf(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org, JFC (Jefsey) Morfin, 17:13
- Re: IETF65 hotel location, Jeffrey Hutzelman, 14:56
- RE: IETF65 hotel location, Robin Uyeshiro, 14:23
- Re: IETF65 hotel location, Spencer Dawkins, 13:30
- Re: IETF65 hotel location, Michael Thomas, 13:13
- Re: IETF65 hotel location, John Levine, 13:07
- Re: IETF65 hotel location, Dave Crocker, 12:47
- Re: IETF65 hotel location, David Kessens, 12:43
- RE: IETF65 hotel location, Hallam-Baker, Phillip, 10:39
- Weekly posting summary for ietf(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org, HarringtonDavid 73653, 10:36
- Re: IETF65 hotel location, John Levine, 09:39
- Re: IETF65 hotel location, Dave Crocker, 08:58
- Re: IETF65 hotel location, Joel Jaeggli, 08:57
- Re: IETF65 hotel location, Pekka Savola, 08:36
- Re: IETF65 hotel location, Brian E Carpenter, 08:06
- IETF65 hotel location, Pekka Savola, 07:18
January 26, 2006
- Re: "too many notes" -- a modest proposal, Anthony G. Atkielski, 23:41
- Re: "too many notes" -- a modest proposal, Theodore Ts'o, 23:07
- Re: draft-hartmans-mailinglist-experiment, nick . staff, 20:33
- Re: I-D ACTION:draft-hartman-mailinglist-experiment-00.txt, Joel M. Halpern, 19:12
- Re: I-D ACTION:draft-hartman-mailinglist-experiment-00.txt, Spencer Dawkins, 17:06
- Re: Weekly posting summary for ietf(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org, JFC (Jefsey) Morfin, 16:49
- Scheduling in WLAN, Nejd Zrelli, 16:46
- Re: I-D ACTION:draft-hartman-mailinglist-experiment-00.txt, Joel M. Halpern, 15:55
- Re: "too many notes" -- a modest proposal, Anthony G. Atkielski, 15:47
- Re: Weekly posting summary for ietf(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org, Anthony G. Atkielski, 15:45
- Re: "too many notes" -- a modest proposal, Anthony G. Atkielski, 15:44
- Re: "too many notes" -- a modest proposal, Anthony G. Atkielski, 15:43
- Re: Interim meetings planning [was Softwires Interim Meeting], John C Klensin, 14:55
- Re: Proposal for keeping "free speech" but limitting the nuisance to the working group (Was: John Cowan supports 3683 PR-action against Jefsey Morfin), Masataka Ohta, 14:48
- Re: Protocol Action: 'LDAP: Internationalized String Preparation' to Proposed Standard, Frank Ellermann, 14:38
- Interim meetings planning [was Softwires Interim Meeting], JORDI PALET MARTINEZ, 14:30
- RE: "too many notes" -- a modest proposal, Gray, Eric, 14:17
- Re: Protocol Action: 'LDAP: Internationalized String Preparation' to Proposed Standard, Kurt D. Zeilenga, 13:26
- Weekly posting summary for ietf(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org, Thomas Narten, 13:19
- Re: "too many notes" -- a modest proposal, John Levine, 10:56
- Re: "too many notes" -- a modest proposal, Noel Chiappa, 10:47
- Re: Protocol Action: 'LDAP: Internationalized String Preparation' to Proposed Standard, Frank Ellermann, 10:46
- Re: draft-hartmans-mailinglist-experiment, Ken Raeburn, 09:47
- Re: draft-hartmans-mailinglist-experiment, Sam Hartman, 09:39
- Re: "too many notes" -- a modest proposal, Andy Bierman, 09:38
- Re: "too many notes" -- a modest proposal, Anthony G. Atkielski, 09:23
- Re: Questions for those in favor of PR-Actions in general, Anthony G. Atkielski, 09:22
- Re: Softwires Interim Meeting, Brian E Carpenter, 09:15
- Re: "too many notes" -- a modest proposal, Anthony G. Atkielski, 09:15
- Re: Secretariat and IASA contacts [Re: getting the IETF rate at theHilton], Spencer Dawkins, 08:48
- Re: getting the IETF rate at the Hilton, Lars Eggert, 08:40
- Secretariat and IASA contacts [Re: getting the IETF rate at the Hilton], Brian E Carpenter, 08:27
- Re: getting the IETF rate at the Hilton, Dave Crocker, 08:16
- Re: draft-hartmans-mailinglist-experiment, Spencer Dawkins, 07:58
- draft-hartmans-mailinglist-experiment, nick . staff, 07:52
- Taking a deep breath (was Re: "too many notes" -- a modest proposal), Spencer Dawkins, 06:41
- Re: getting the IETF rate at the Hilton, Brian E Carpenter, 06:14
- Re: getting the IETF rate at the Hilton, Lars Eggert, 06:12
- Re: Proposal for keeping "free speech" but limitting the nuisance to the working group (Was: John Cowan supports 3683 PR-action against Jefsey Morfin), Brian E Carpenter, 05:55
- Re: Proposal for keeping "free speech" but limitting the nuisance to the working group (Was: John Cowan supports 3683 PR-action against Jefsey Morfin), Masataka Ohta, 05:22
- Re: "too many notes" -- a modest proposal, Brian E Carpenter, 05:18
- Re: Proposal for keeping "free speech" but limitting the nuisance to the working group (Was: John Cowan supports 3683 PR-action against Jefsey Morfin), Brian E Carpenter, 05:09
- getting the IETF rate at the Hilton, Lars Eggert, 03:44
- typo of mine: Re: Questions for those in favor of PR-Actions in general, JFC (Jefsey) Morfin, 01:07
- Re: Questions for those in favor of PR-Actions in general, JFC (Jefsey) Morfin, 00:49
- Re: "too many notes" -- a modest proposal, Eliot Lear, 00:22
January 25, 2006
- Re: Questions for those in favor of PR-Actions in general, Randy Presuhn, 22:24
- Re: "too many notes" -- a modest proposal, Andy Bierman, 21:55
- Re: "too many notes" -- a modest proposal & Re: Proposal for keeping "free speech" but limitting the nuisance to the working group (Was: John Cowan supports 3683 PR-action against Jefsey Morfin), Anthony G. Atkielski, 21:14
- Re: "too many notes" -- a modest proposal, Anthony G. Atkielski, 21:12
- Re: Questions for those in favor of PR-Actions in general, Anthony G. Atkielski, 21:09
- Re: "too many notes" -- a modest proposal, Anthony G. Atkielski, 21:08
- Re: "too many notes" -- a modest proposal, Anthony G. Atkielski, 21:04
- Re: Meeting Survey Results, David Kessens, 20:07
- Re: "too many notes" -- a modest proposal, Douglas Otis, 19:23
- Re: Meeting Survey Results, Marshall Eubanks, 16:16
- Re: "too many notes" -- a modest proposal, Harald Tveit Alvestrand, 15:28
- Re: Meeting Survey Results, JORDI PALET MARTINEZ, 15:19
- Re: "too many notes" -- a modest proposal & Re: Proposal for keeping "free speech" but limitting the nuisance to the working group (Was: John Cowan supports 3683 PR-action against Jefsey Morfin), Jeroen Massar, 15:00
- Re: "too many notes" -- a modest proposal, Scott Kitterman, 14:54
- Re: "too many notes" -- a modest proposal, Andy Bierman, 14:49
- Re: Questions for those in favor of PR-Actions in general, Michael StJohns, 14:37
- RE: "too many notes" -- a modest proposal, Steve Silverman, 14:15
- "too many notes" -- a modest proposal, Michael Thomas, 13:28
- Re: Meeting Survey Results, David Kessens, 12:59
- Re: Meeting Survey Results, David Kessens, 12:52
- Re: Meeting Survey Results, Francis Dupont, 12:33
- RE: Free speech? Re: Against "PR-action against Jefsey Morfin", Gray, Eric, 12:04
- 802.11a (RE: Meeting Survey Results), Harald Tveit Alvestrand, 11:57
- Re: Meeting Survey Results, Steven M. Bellovin, 11:39
- RE: Meeting Survey Results, Odonoghue, Karen F CIV B35-Branch, 11:33
- RE: Meeting Survey Results, Odonoghue, Karen F CIV B35-Branch, 11:21
- Re: Meeting Survey Results, Steven M. Bellovin, 11:03
- help help, I'm trapped on the bofchairs list, John L, 10:48
- RE: Meeting Survey Results, Ed Juskevicius, 10:16
- Re: Meeting Survey Results, Tim Chown, 10:02
- Re: Proposal for keeping "free speech" but limitting the nuisance to the working group (Was: John Cowan supports 3683 PR-action against Jefsey Morfin), Doug Royer, 07:02
- Re: IETFs... the final Friday?, Cyrus Daboo, 06:57
- Re: Questions for those in favor of CoS in general, Peter Dambier, 06:05
- Re: Meeting Survey Results, JORDI PALET MARTINEZ, 05:47
- Questions for those in favor of PR-Actions in general, nick . staff, 05:02
- Re: Questions for those in favor of PR-Actions in general, Frank Ellermann, 02:03
- Re: Free speech? Re: Against "PR-action against Jefsey Morfin", Brian E Carpenter, 00:47
- FOR the PR re: JFC, Martin Hannigan, 00:03
January 24, 2006
- Re: Meeting Survey Results, David Kessens, 21:40
- Questions for those in favor of PR-Actions in general, nick . staff, 20:58
- Re: Against "PR-action against Jefsey Morfin", Anthony G. Atkielski, 19:59
- Re: Free speech? Re: Against "PR-action against Jefsey Morfin", Anthony G. Atkielski, 19:57
- Richard Shockey supports IETF "renditioning" the Jefsey Morfin problem to the CIA, Richard Shockey, 18:37
- Free speech? Re: Against "PR-action against Jefsey Morfin", grenville armitage, 17:48
- Re: Meeting Survey Results, rpelletier, 17:23
- RE: Against "PR-action against Jefsey Morfin", Gray, Eric, 16:59
- Re: Against "PR-action against Jefsey Morfin", Harald Tveit Alvestrand, 16:52
- Re: Meeting Survey Results, Bill Sommerfeld, 16:47
- Re: Against "PR-action against Jefsey Morfin", william(at)elan.net, 16:46
- Re: Against "PR-action against Jefsey Morfin", Anthony G. Atkielski, 16:46
- Re: Softwires Interim Meeting, Mark Townsley, 16:41
- Re: Softwires Interim Meeting, James M. Polk, 16:35
- Re: Against "PR-action against Jefsey Morfin", Noel Chiappa, 16:18
- Re: Softwires Interim Meeting, Harald Tveit Alvestrand, 16:17
- Re: Meeting Survey Results, Marshall Eubanks, 15:42
- RE: Meeting Survey Results, Odonoghue, Karen F CIV B35-Branch, 15:35
- Re: Softwires Interim Meeting, JORDI PALET MARTINEZ, 15:11
- Re: Softwires Interim Meeting, James M. Polk, 15:06
- Re: Softwires Interim Meeting, Marshall Eubanks, 14:54
- Re: Softwires Interim Meeting, James M. Polk, 14:42
- RE: Proposal for keeping "free speech" but limitting the nuisance to the working group (Was: John Cowan supports 3683 PR-action against Jefsey Morfin), Dassa, 14:04
- Re: IETF Last Call under RFC 3683 concerning JFC (Jefsey) Morfin, Marshall Eubanks, 13:55
- Re: Proposal for keeping "free speech" but limitting the nuisance to the working group (Was: John Cowan supports 3683 PR-action against Jefsey Morfin), Harald Tveit Alvestrand, 13:25
- Against "PR-action against Jefsey Morfin", william(at)elan.net, 13:09
- Proposal for keeping "free speech" but limitting the nuisance to the working group (Was: John Cowan supports 3683 PR-action against Jefsey Morfin), Jeroen Massar, 12:49
- Misha Wolf supports PR-action against Jefsey Morfin, Misha Wolf, 12:39
- Re: Meeting Survey Results, JORDI PALET MARTINEZ, 11:47
- Re: Meeting Survey Results, Ned Freed, 09:56
- Re: hotels for Dallas?, rpelletier, 09:54
- Preventing posting vs preventing the airing of opinion, Harald Tveit Alvestrand, 09:31
- P2P-SIP effort, Philip Matthews, 09:27
- Re: hotels for Dallas?, Adam Roach, 09:05
- Re: how to declare consensus when someone ignores consensus, nick . staff, 09:00
- Re: posting privileges vs receiver-side filtering, Spencer Dawkins, 08:49
- Re: posting privileges vs receiver-side filtering, Anthony G. Atkielski, 08:37
- Re: John Cowan supports 3683 PR-action against Jefsey Morfin, Anthony G. Atkielski, 08:35
- Re: junior lawyers, was List archives and copyright, Anthony G. Atkielski, 08:32
- Re: Meeting Survey Results, Adam Roach, 07:46
- Re: IETFs... the final Friday?, Spencer Dawkins, 06:59
- Re: IETFs... the final Friday?, Brian E Carpenter, 06:49
- Putting ideas into practice, Spencer Dawkins, 05:41
- Re: IETFs... the final Friday?, Julien . Maisonneuve, 03:02
- Re: posting privileges vs receiver-side filtering, Brian E Carpenter, 01:29
- Questionnaire [Re: IETFs... the final Friday?], Brian E Carpenter, 01:07
January 23, 2006
- Re: IETF Last Call under RFC 3683 concerning JFC (Jefsey) Morfin, Eliot Lear, 23:12
- Re: John Cowan supports 3683 PR-action against Jefsey Morfin, Pekka Savola, 23:07
- Re: John Cowan supports 3683 PR-action against Jefsey Morfin, Randy.Dunlap, 22:56
- Re: John Cowan supports 3683 PR-action against Jefsey Morfin, John Levine, 22:23
- Re: junior lawyers, was List archives and copyright, John Levine, 22:22
- Re: Meeting Survey Results, Chris Elliott, 22:14
- Re: Meeting Survey Results, Soininen Jonne (Nokia-NET/Espoo), 22:01
- Re: John Cowan supports 3683 PR-action against Jefsey Morfin, Anthony G. Atkielski, 21:40
- Re: posting privileges vs receiver-side filtering, Anthony G. Atkielski, 21:40
- Re: IETF Last Call under RFC 3683 concerning JFC (Jefsey) Morfin, Anthony G. Atkielski, 21:39
- Re: Meeting Survey Results, Ken Raeburn, 21:33
- Re: John Cowan supports 3683 PR-action against Jefsey Morfin, Anthony G. Atkielski, 21:28
- Re: List archives and copyright [WAS Re: John Cowan supports 3683 PR-action against Jefsey Morfin], Anthony G. Atkielski, 21:23
- Re: Meeting Survey Results, Joel Jaeggli, 21:11
- Should we ban people who say they will appeal a WG Chair decision, JFC (Jefsey) Morfin, 21:05
- Re: IETF Last Call under RFC 3683 concerning JFC (Jefsey) Morfin, JFC (Jefsey) Morfin, 21:02
- Re: Meeting Survey Results, JORDI PALET MARTINEZ, 20:48
- Re: how to declare consensus when someone ignores consensus, Noel Chiappa, 20:26
- Re: IETFs... the final Friday?, Marshall Eubanks, 19:39
- Re: IETFs... the final Friday?, Allison Mankin, 19:32
- Re: how to declare consensus when someone ignores consensus, nick . staff, 19:27
- Re: John Cowan supports 3683 PR-action against Jefsey Morfin, Joel M. Halpern, 19:25
- Re: IETFs... the final Friday?, Marshall Eubanks, 19:20
- Re: IETF Last Call under RFC 3683 concerning JFC (Jefsey) Morfin, Marshall Eubanks, 18:49
- posting privileges vs receiver-side filtering, grenville armitage, 18:48
- Re: IETFs... the final Friday?, Theodore Ts'o, 18:37
- Re: IETF Last Call under RFC 3683 concerning JFC (Jefsey) Morfin, Dave Crocker, 18:37
- Re: John Cowan supports 3683 PR-action against Jefsey Morfin, JFC (Jefsey) Morfin, 18:32
- Re: IETFs... the final Friday?, Dave Crocker, 18:19
- Re: John Cowan supports 3683 PR-action against Jefsey Morfin, Theodore Ts'o, 18:04
- Re: IETFs... the final Friday?, Jeffrey Hutzelman, 16:12
- Re: IETFs... the final Friday?, Spencer Dawkins, 15:47
- Meeting Survey Results, rpelletier, 15:47
- Re: IETFs... the final Friday?, Eric Rescorla, 15:32
- Re: IETFs... the final Friday?, Lars Eggert, 15:30
- Re: List archives and copyright [WAS Re: John Cowan supports 3683 PR-action against Jefsey Morfin], grenville armitage, 15:24
- Re: IETFs... the final Friday?, Ken Raeburn, 15:23
- Re: IETF Last Call under RFC 3683 concerning JFC (Jefsey) Morfin, Grossman Dan-LDG004, 15:21
- Re: IETF Last Call under RFC 3683 concerning JFC (Jefsey) Morfin, Sean Dorman, 15:20
- Re: List archives and copyright [WAS Re: John Cowan supports 3683 PR-action against Jefsey Morfin], Jeroen Massar, 15:20
- Re: List archives and copyright [WAS Re: John Cowan supports 3683 PR-action against Jefsey Morfin], Anthony G. Atkielski, 15:13
- Re: IETFs... the final Friday?, Allison Mankin, 15:10
- Re: IETFs... the final Friday?, Pete Resnick, 14:45
- List archives and copyright [WAS Re: John Cowan supports 3683 PR-action against Jefsey Morfin], Michael Froomkin - U.Miami School of Law, 14:17
- Re: OT: The case of sysop twit, Anthony G. Atkielski, 13:32
- Re: suggestion on distributed systems, Anthony G. Atkielski, 13:28
- Re: John Cowan supports 3683 PR-action against Jefsey Morfin, Anthony G. Atkielski, 13:28
- Re: John Cowan supports 3683 PR-action against Jefsey Morfin, Anthony G. Atkielski, 13:28
- RE: IETF Last Call under RFC 3683 concerning JFC (Jefsey) Morfin, Gray, Eric, 12:44
- what happened to America's internet Future? - a pointer to an essay, Gordon Cook, 12:32
- RE: how to declare consensus when someone ignores consensus, Gray, Eric, 12:00
- Re: IETF Last Call under RFC 3683 concerning JFC (Jefsey) Morfin, Eliot Lear, 11:24
- OT: The case of sysop twit, Frank Ellermann, 11:16
- RE: IETF Last Call under RFC 3683 concerning JFC (Jefsey) Morfin, Gray, Eric, 11:09
- RE: I-D ACTION:draft-palet-ietf-meeting-venue-selection-criteria- 04.txt, Gray, Eric, 11:04
- Re: suggestion on distributed systems, Steven M. Bellovin, 09:47
- Re: P2P protocols (Re: Re: how to declare consensus when someone ignores consensus), Steven M. Bellovin, 09:39
- Re: John Cowan supports 3683 PR-action against Jefsey Morfin, Jeroen Massar, 09:33
- Re: John Cowan supports 3683 PR-action against Jefsey Morfin, Stephane Bortzmeyer, 09:27
- Re: how to declare consensus when someone ignores consensus, Elwyn Davies, 08:47
- Re: suggestion on distributed systems, Anthony G. Atkielski, 08:36
- Re: John Cowan supports 3683 PR-action against Jefsey Morfin, Anthony G. Atkielski, 08:36
- Re: suggestion on distributed systems, Stephane Bortzmeyer, 08:02
- Re: how to declare consensus when someone ignores consensus, Ned Freed, 08:01
- Re: suggestion on distributed systems, Harald Tveit Alvestrand, 07:48
- P2P protocols (Re: Re: how to declare consensus when someone ignores consensus), Harald Tveit Alvestrand, 07:48
- John Cowan supports 3683 PR-action against Jefsey Morfin, John Cowan, 07:43
- Re: suggestion on distributed systems, Peter Dambier, 07:42
- Re: how to declare consensus when someone ignores consensus, Anthony G. Atkielski, 07:06
- Re: how to declare consensus when someone ignores consensus, Anthony G. Atkielski, 07:06
- Re: how to declare consensus when someone ignores consensus, Anthony G. Atkielski, 07:03
- Re: how to declare consensus when someone ignores consensus, Anthony G. Atkielski, 06:59
- Re: IETF Last Call under RFC 3683 concerning JFC (Jefsey) Morfin, nick . staff, 05:58
- Re: suggestion on distributed systems, Stephane Bortzmeyer, 02:25
- Re: IETF Last Call under RFC 3683 concerning JFC (Jefsey) Morfin, Brian E Carpenter, 02:10
- Re: how to declare consensus when someone ignores consensus, Dave Crocker, 01:24
January 22, 2006
- Re: Re: how to declare consensus when someone ignores consensus, John Loughney, 21:30
- Re: IETF Last Call under RFC 3683 concerning JFC (Jefsey) Morfin, JFC (Jefsey) Morfin, 19:59
- Mr. Smith was at the IETF (was RE: Mr. Smith goes to the IETF), JFC (Jefsey) Morfin, 19:57
- Re: how to declare consensus when someone ignores consensus, Robert Sayre, 16:10
- Re: how to declare consensus when someone ignores consensus, nick . staff, 15:29
- Re: how to declare consensus when someone ignores consensus, Scott W Brim, 15:14
- how to declare consensus when someone ignores consensus, John Loughney, 14:34
- Re: I-D ACTION:draft-palet-ietf-meeting-venue-selection-criteria-04.txt, JORDI PALET MARTINEZ, 14:07
- Re: I-D ACTION:draft-palet-ietf-meeting-venue-selection-criteria- 04.txt, JORDI PALET MARTINEZ, 14:06
- Re: IETF Last Call under RFC 3683 concerning JFC (Jefsey) Morfin, Marshall Eubanks, 13:36
- AW: Location Types Registry, Tschofenig, Hannes, 12:50
- Re: FW: IETF Last Call under RFC 3683 concerning JFC (Jefsey) Morfin, Dave Crocker, 12:47
- suggestion on distributed systems, Neil Harwani, 12:27
- Re: FW: IETF Last Call under RFC 3683 concerning JFC (Jefsey) Morfin, kent crispin, 12:18
- Re: Location Types Registry, Frank Ellermann, 11:46
- Re: IETF Last Call under RFC 3683 concerning JFC (Jefsey) Morfin, nick . staff, 11:41
- Re: Does the IESG have the authority to do less than 3683?, Dave Crocker, 11:08
- Re: Location Types Registry, Adam Roach, 10:30
- Re: Location Types Registry, Henning Schulzrinne, 10:12
- Re: Location Types Registry, Frank Ellermann, 09:52
- RE: Mr. Smith goes to the IETF, Margaret Wasserman, 09:09
- AW: Location Types Registry, Tschofenig, Hannes, 08:45
- Re: Does the IESG have the authority to do less than 3683?, John C Klensin, 08:26
- RE: IETF Last Call under RFC 3683 concerning JFC (Jefsey) Morfin, Wijnen, Bert (Bert), 07:54
- Re: IETF Last Call under RFC 3683 concerning JFC (Jefsey) Morfin, Anthony G. Atkielski, 07:38
- Re: IETF Last Call under RFC 3683 concerning JFC (Jefsey) Morfin, Peter Dambier, 07:15
- Re: I-D ACTION:draft-palet-ietf-meeting-venue-selection-criteria-04.txt, Joel M. Halpern, 06:43
- Re: IETF Last Call under RFC 3683 concerning JFC (Jefsey) Morfin, Adrian Farrel, 06:19
- Re: IETF Last Call under RFC 3683 concerning JFC (Jefsey) Morfin, Marshall Eubanks, 05:50
- Re: IETF Last Call under RFC 3683 concerning JFC (Jefsey) Morfin, Eliot Lear, 05:34
- Re: FW: IETF Last Call under RFC 3683 concerning JFC (Jefsey) Mor fin, Peter Dambier, 05:30
- Re: Does the IESG have the authority to do less than 3683?, Brian E Carpenter, 05:09
- Re: IETF Last Call under RFC 3683 concerning JFC (Jefsey) Morfin, Marshall Eubanks, 05:06
- Re: FW: IETF Last Call under RFC 3683 concerning JFC (Jefsey) Mor fin, Anthony G. Atkielski, 04:26
- Re: FW: IETF Last Call under RFC 3683 concerning JFC (Jefsey) Morfin, Anthony G. Atkielski, 04:24
- Re: I-D ACTION:draft-palet-ietf-meeting-venue-selection-criteria-04.txt, Brian E Carpenter, 02:04
- Re: Ietf Digest, Vol 21, Issue 63, Scott W Brim, 01:49
- Re: Location Types Registry, Frank Ellermann, 00:11
January 21, 2006
- Re: FW: IETF Last Call under RFC 3683 concerning JFC (Jefsey) Mor fin, nick . staff, 18:07
- Re: FW: IETF Last Call under RFC 3683 concerning JFC (Jefsey) Mor fin, nick . staff, 18:05
- Re: Ietf Digest, Vol 21, Issue 63, Elwyn Davies, 17:23
- Re: FW: IETF Last Call under RFC 3683 concerning JFC (Jefsey) Mor fin, Sam Hartman, 14:51
- AW: [Geopriv] Re: Last Call: 'Location Types Registry' to Proposed Standard, Tschofenig, Hannes, 14:10
- Location Types Registry, Tschofenig, Hannes, 14:08
- Re: FW: IETF Last Call under RFC 3683 concerning JFC (Jefsey) Morfin, John Levine, 13:17
- Re: IETF Last Call under RFC 3683 concerning JFC (Jefsey) Morfin, Lisa Dusseault, 10:33
- "Mr. Smith was in the IETF", JFC (Jefsey) Morfin, 05:11
- Re: IETF Last Call under RFC 3683 concerning JFC (Jefsey) Morfin, Peter Dambier, 04:35
- Re: IETF Last Call under RFC 3683 concerning JFC (Jefsey) Morfin, Anthony G. Atkielski, 02:53
January 20, 2006
- Re: IETF Last Call under RFC 3683 concerning JFC (Jefsey) Morfin, Tim Bray, 23:45
- Re: Consensus, JFC (Jefsey) Morfin, 21:33
- RE: FW: IETF Last Call under RFC 3683 concerning JFC (Jefsey) Mor fin, Noel Chiappa, 20:43
- RE: FW: IETF Last Call under RFC 3683 concerning JFC (Jefsey) Mor fin, Ned Freed, 17:39
- An Experiment in IETF Mailing List Management, Sam Hartman, 17:38
- Re: WG links to positions, JFC (Jefsey) Morfin, 17:36
- Consensus, Sam Hartman, 17:28
- Re: An Experiment in IETF Mailing List Management, Frank Ellermann, 17:28
- Emmanuel DESMET/BE/ALCATEL is out of the office, Emmanuel . Desmet, 17:25
- Emmanuel DESMET/BE/ALCATEL is out of the office, Emmanuel . Desmet, 17:04
- RE: FW: IETF Last Call under RFC 3683 concerning JFC (Jefsey) Mor fin, Gray, Eric, 15:22
- Re: FW: IETF Last Call under RFC 3683 concerning JFC (Jefsey) Morfin, Frank Ellermann, 15:10
- Re: hotels for Dallas?, Ray Pelletier, 14:39
- Re: FW: IETF Last Call under RFC 3683 concerning JFC (Jefsey) Morfin, Sam Hartman, 14:36
- WG links to positions, Sam Hartman, 14:30
- Re: I-D ACTION:draft-palet-ietf-meeting-venue-selection-criteria- 04.txt, Joe Abley, 14:14
- RE: IETF Last Call under RFC 3683 concerning JFC (Jefsey) Morfin, Margaret Wasserman, 14:13
- Re: hotels for Dallas?, Jeffrey Hutzelman, 14:08
- Re: IETF Last Call under RFC 3683 [...], Frank Ellermann, 12:43
- RE: IETF Last Call under RFC 3683 concerning JFC (Jefsey) Morfin, Gray, Eric, 12:19
- Re: FW: IETF Last Call under RFC 3683 concerning JFC (Jefsey) Morfin, Frank Ellermann, 12:05
- Does the IESG have the authority to do less than 3683?, Sam Hartman, 11:54
- Re: IETF Last Call under RFC 3683 concerning JFC (Jefsey) Morfin, Sam Hartman, 11:37
- Re: IETF Last Call under RFC 3683 concerning JFC (Jefsey) Morfin, Sam Hartman, 11:33
- Re: IETF Last Call under RFC 3683 concerning JFC (Jefsey) Morfin, Eliot Lear, 11:27
- Re: IETF Last Call under RFC 3683 concerning JFC (Jefsey) Morfin, Anthony G. Atkielski, 10:52
- Re: IETF Last Call under RFC 3683 concerning JFC (Jefsey) Morfin, Tony Finch, 10:38
- Re: IETF Last Call under RFC 3683 concerning JFC (Jefsey) Morfin, Harald Tveit Alvestrand, 10:30
- Re: Ietf Digest, Vol 21, Issue 74, Neil Harwani, 10:17
- Re: I-D ACTION:draft-palet-ietf-meeting-venue-selection-criteria-04.txt, bmanning, 10:10
- Re: [Geopriv] Re: Last Call: 'Location Types Registry' to Proposed Standard, John Schnizlein, 10:09
- Re: FW: IETF Last Call under RFC 3683 concerning JFC (Jefsey) Morfin, Michael Everson, 10:08
- RE: I-D ACTION:draft-palet-ietf-meeting-venue-selection-criteria- 04.txt, Wijnen, Bert (Bert), 10:00
- Re: IETF Last Call under RFC 3683 concerning JFC (Jefsey) Morfin, Sam Hartman, 09:45
- Re: IETF Last Call under RFC 3683 concerning JFC (Jefsey) Morfin, Dave Crocker, 09:42
- Re: I-D ACTION:draft-palet-ietf-meeting-venue-selection-criteria-04.txt, Barry Leiba, 09:40
- RE: I-D ACTION:draft-palet-ietf-meeting-venue-selection-criteria- 04.txt, Gray, Eric, 09:21
- Re: FW: I-D ACTION:draft-palet-ietf-meeting-venue-selection-criteria-04.txt, Lucy E. Lynch, 08:32
- Re: hotels for Dallas?, Brian E Carpenter, 07:09
- RE: IETF Last Call under RFC 3683 concerning JFC (Jefsey) Morfin, Wijnen, Bert (Bert), 07:09
- Re: IETF Last Call under RFC 3683 concerning JFC (Jefsey) Morfin, Peter Dambier, 06:46
- Re: IETF Last Call under RFC 3683 concerning JFC (Jefsey) Morfin, Stephane Bortzmeyer, 05:42
- Re: IETFs... the final Friday?, Brian E Carpenter, 05:22
- Re: I-D ACTION:draft-palet-ietf-meeting-venue-selection-criteria-04.txt, Brian E Carpenter, 05:16
- RE: IETF Last Call under RFC 3683 concerning JFC (Jefsey) Morfin, Margaret Wasserman, 05:05
- Mr. Smith goes to the IETF, JFC (Jefsey) Morfin, 04:48
- Re: hotels for Dallas?, Tim Chown, 04:40
- Re: hotels for Dallas?, Brian E Carpenter, 04:37
- IETFs... the final Friday?, Tim Chown, 03:43
- In praise of RFC 3683 (Re: IETF Last Call), Harald Tveit Alvestrand, 02:03
- hotels for Dallas?, Lars Eggert, 01:50
- Re: IETF Last Call under RFC 3683 concerning JFC (Jefsey) Morfin, Harald Tveit Alvestrand, 00:24
- Re: I-D ACTION:draft-palet-ietf-meeting-venue-selection-criteria-04.txt, John C Klensin, 00:07
January 19, 2006
- Re: I-D ACTION:draft-palet-ietf-meeting-venue-selection-criteria-04.txt, Richard Shockey, 21:07
- Re: I-D ACTION:draft-palet-ietf-meeting-venue-selection-criteria-04.txt, JORDI PALET MARTINEZ, 20:57
- Re: I-D ACTION:draft-palet-ietf-meeting-venue-selection-criteria-04.txt, Richard Shockey, 20:38
- Re: I-D ACTION:draft-palet-ietf-meeting-venue-selection-criteria-04.txt, JORDI PALET MARTINEZ, 20:35
- Re: IETF Last Call under RFC 3683 concerning JFC (Jefsey) Morfin, John C Klensin, 20:29
- Re: I-D ACTION:draft-palet-ietf-meeting-venue-selection-criteria-04.txt, John C Klensin, 20:02
- Re: I-D ACTION:draft-palet-ietf-meeting-venue-selection-criteria-04.txt, Marshall Eubanks, 19:28
- Re: Wireless at IETF, Steven M. Bellovin, 19:12
- Re: Wireless at IETF, Sam Hartman, 19:12
- Re: I-D ACTION:draft-palet-ietf-meeting-venue-selection-criteria-04.txt, JORDI PALET MARTINEZ, 19:02
- Re: I-D ACTION:draft-palet-ietf-meeting-venue-selection-criteria-04.txt, JORDI PALET MARTINEZ, 18:59
- Re: I-D ACTION:draft-palet-ietf-meeting-venue-selection-criteria-04.txt, JORDI PALET MARTINEZ, 18:50
- Re: IETF Last Call under RFC 3683 concerning JFC (Jefsey) Morfin, Sam Hartman, 18:10
- Re: [Geopriv] Re: Last Call: 'Location Types Registry' to Proposed Standard, Sam Hartman, 16:29
- Re: [Geopriv] Re: Last Call: 'Location Types Registry' to Proposed Standard, Jeffrey Hutzelman, 15:31
- Re: FW: I-D ACTION:draft-palet-ietf-meeting-venue-selection-criteria-04.txt, Spencer Dawkins, 15:05
- Re: [Geopriv] Re: Last Call: 'Location Types Registry' to Proposed Standard, Harald Tveit Alvestrand, 14:59
- Re: FW: I-D ACTION:draft-palet-ietf-meeting-venue-selection-criteria-04.txt, Paul Hoffman, 14:48
- Re: [Geopriv] Re: Last Call: 'Location Types Registry' to Proposed Standard, Henning Schulzrinne, 14:03
- Re: FW: I-D ACTION:draft-palet-ietf-meeting-venue-selection-criteria-04.txt, Pekka Savola, 13:37
- Re: FW: I-DACTION:draft-palet-ietf-meeting-venue-selection-criteria-04.txt, Adrian Farrel, 12:59
- Re: FW: I-D ACTION:draft-palet-ietf-meeting-venue-selection-criteria-04.txt, Richard Shockey, 12:52
- Re: [Geopriv] Re: Last Call: 'Location Types Registry' to Proposed Standard, JFC (Jefsey) Morfin, 08:13
- Re: [Geopriv] Re: Last Call: 'Location Types Registry' to Proposed Standard, Harald Tveit Alvestrand, 06:17
- Re: [Geopriv] Re: Last Call: 'Location Types Registry' to Proposed Standard, Henning Schulzrinne, 06:00
- RE: Last Call: 'A Roadmap for TCP Specification Documents' to In formational RFC, Wijnen, Bert (Bert), 03:50
- Re: [Geopriv] Re: Last Call: 'Location Types Registry' to Proposed Standard, Stephen Farrell, 00:49
January 18, 2006
- Transport layer Protocol Implementation in GLOMOSIM, JAGADEESH PRASAD, 23:15
- Transport layer Protocol Implementation in GLOMOSIM, JAGADEESH PRASAD, 23:11
- Re: [Geopriv] Re: Last Call: 'Location Types Registry' to Proposed Standard, Henning Schulzrinne, 20:51
- RE: Last Call: 'A Roadmap for TCP Specification Documents' to In formational RFC, Gray, Eric, 18:08
- Re: Wireless at IETF, Ted Faber, 16:52
- Re: Last Call: 'Location Types Registry' to Proposed Standard, Jeffrey Hutzelman, 16:10
- RE: Wireless at IETF, Hallam-Baker, Phillip, 15:28
- Re: Wireless at IETF, Joe Abley, 15:04
- FW: I-D ACTION:draft-palet-ietf-meeting-venue-selection-criteria-04.txt, JORDI PALET MARTINEZ, 14:44
- RE: Wireless at IETF, Dassa, 13:40
- Re: Wireless at IETF, Ted Faber, 12:57
- Re: Wireless at IETF, Steven M. Bellovin, 12:27
- Venue Selection Criteria - new (last ?) version, JORDI PALET MARTINEZ, 12:01
- Re: Wireless at IETF, Ted Faber, 11:59
- RE: Wireless at IETF, Hallam-Baker, Phillip, 11:36
- RE: Wireless at IETF, Ed Juskevicius, 10:34
- Re: Last Call: 'Location Types Registry' to Proposed Standard, Henning Schulzrinne, 07:54
- IETF Last Call under RFC 3683 concerning JFC (Jefsey) Morfin, Scott Hollenbeck, 05:35
- Re: Last Call: 'Location Types Registry' to Proposed Standard, Harald Tveit Alvestrand, 00:35
January 17, 2006
- Re: Last Call: 'Location Types Registry' to Proposed Standard, C. M. Heard, 21:57
- Re: Last Call: 'Location Types Registry' to Proposed Standard, Henning Schulzrinne, 19:08
- Re: Last Call: 'Location Types Registry' to Proposed Standard, Sam Hartman, 18:44
- Re: Last Call: 'Location Types Registry' to Proposed Standard, Frank Ellermann, 17:32
- Re: Last Call: 'Location Types Registry' to Proposed Standard, Andrew Newton, 16:31
- Re: Last Call: 'Location Types Registry' to Proposed Standard, Sam Hartman, 16:06
- Re: Volume 1 Issue 2 of the IETF Journal, Frank Ellermann, 13:35
- Re: Last Call: 'Location Types Registry' to Proposed Standard, JFC (Jefsey) Morfin, 10:34
- Re: Last Call: 'Location Types Registry' to Proposed Standard, Henning Schulzrinne, 07:11
- Re: Last Call: 'Location Types Registry' to Proposed Standard, Frank Ellermann, 07:08
- Re: Last Call: 'Location Types Registry' to Proposed Standard, Joe Abley, 06:47
- Re: Last Call: 'Location Types Registry' to Proposed Standard, Frank Ellermann, 06:05
January 16, 2006
- Re: Ietf Digest, Vol 21, Issue 63, Robert Kahn, 14:14
- Re: Ietf Digest, Vol 21, Issue 63, Marshall Eubanks, 13:16
- Re: Ietf Digest, Vol 21, Issue 63, Patrice Lyons, 13:03
- Re: An important day for the IETF, Larry J. Blunk, 11:49
- Re: Wireless at IETF, Brett Thorson, 09:47
- Re: An important day for the IETF, JFC (Jefsey) Morfin, 08:38
- Re: An important day for the IETF, Harald Tveit Alvestrand, 08:01
- Re: An important day for the IETF, Noel Chiappa, 07:41
- Re: An important day for the IETF, Harald Tveit Alvestrand, 04:46
- An important day for the IETF, Brian E Carpenter, 03:22
January 15, 2006
- Re: Wireless at IETF, Joe Abley, 19:03
- Re: A plug for XXE (Re: Alternative formats for IDs), Elwyn Davies, 16:14
- Re: Wireless at IETF, Paul Hoffman, 15:37
- Re: Wireless at IETF, Marshall Eubanks, 14:40
- Re: Wireless at IETF, Marshall Eubanks, 14:38
- Re: Wireless at IETF, Harald Tveit Alvestrand, 14:15
- Wireless at IETF, Henning Schulzrinne, 13:26
- Re: A plug for XXE (Re: Alternative formats for IDs), Joe Touch, 12:05
- Re: A plug for XXE (Re: Alternative formats for IDs), Joe Touch, 10:52
- Re: A plug for XXE (Re: Alternative formats for IDs), Harald Tveit Alvestrand, 10:49
- Re: A plug for XXE (Re: Alternative formats for IDs), Joe Touch, 10:43
- Re: Alternative formats for IDs, Julian Reschke, 10:41
- Re: Alternative formats for IDs, Pekka Savola, 10:40
- Re: A plug for XXE (Re: Alternative formats for IDs), Elwyn Davies, 10:35
- Re: A plug for XXE (Re: Alternative formats for IDs), Elwyn Davies, 09:28
January 13, 2006
- A plug for XXE (Re: Alternative formats for IDs), Harald Tveit Alvestrand, 20:26
- Re: Alternative formats for IDs, Ted Faber, 18:23
- Re: Alternative formats for IDs, Dave Crocker, 17:03
- Re: Alternative formats for IDs, Frank Ellermann, 16:45
- Re: Alternative formats for IDs, Ted Faber, 16:08
- Re: Alternative formats for IDs, Ned Freed, 15:56
- Re: Alternative formats for IDs, Douglas Otis, 15:38
- RE: Alternative formats for IDs, Hallam-Baker, Phillip, 14:15
- Re: Alternative formats for IDs, Spencer Dawkins, 14:14
- Re: Alternative formats for IDs, Dave Crocker, 14:04
- Re: Alternative formats for IDs, Barry Leiba, 13:56
- Re: Alternative formats for IDs, Bob Braden, 13:50
- Re: Alternative formats for IDs, Spencer Dawkins, 13:19
- Re: Alternative formats for IDs, Eric Rescorla, 13:09
- Re: Alternative formats for IDs, Dave Crocker, 13:08
- Re: Alternative formats for IDs, Spencer Dawkins, 13:04
- Re: Alternative formats for IDs, Dave Crocker, 13:00
- Re: Alternative formats for IDs, Steven M. Bellovin, 12:59
- Re: Alternative formats for IDs, Joe Touch, 12:56
- Re: Alternative formats for IDs, Eric Rescorla, 12:53
- Re: Alternative formats for IDs, Barry Leiba, 12:36
- Offtopic: Alternative XML markup RE: Alternative formats for IDs, Hallam-Baker, Phillip, 09:19
January 12, 2006
- Re: Alternative formats for IDs, Dave Crocker, 22:46
- Re: Alternative formats for IDs, Scott Bradner, 20:29
- Re: Alternative formats for IDs, Bill Fenner, 20:21
- Re: Alternative formats for IDs, Jeffrey Hutzelman, 19:04
- Re: Alternative formats for IDs, Ted Faber, 18:56
- Re: Alternative formats for IDs, Keith Moore, 18:48
- Re: Alternative formats for IDs, Steven M. Bellovin, 18:31
- Re: Alternative formats for IDs, Dave Crocker, 17:23
- Re: Alternative formats for IDs, Bob Braden, 16:45
- Re: Alternative formats for IDs, Bob Braden, 16:32
- RE: PDF, Postscript, and "normative" versions (was: Re: Baby Steps (was RE: Alternative formats for IDs)), Lars-Erik Jonsson \(LU/EAB\), 16:26
- Re: Alternative formats for IDs, Jeffrey Hutzelman, 16:19
- Re: Alternative formats for IDs, Jeffrey Hutzelman, 16:09
- Re: Alternative formats for IDs, Dave Crocker, 15:10
- Re: Alternative formats for IDs, Julian Reschke, 14:45
- RE: Alternative formats for IDs, Bob Braden, 14:39
- Re: Alternative formats for IDs, Henrik Levkowetz, 14:34
- RE: PDF, Postscript, and "normative" versions (was: Re: Baby Steps (was RE: Alternativeformats for IDs)), Hallam-Baker, Phillip, 13:38
- OK this discussion is OLD!!! (was: Re: Normative figures), Eliot Lear, 12:48
- RE: Normative figures, Nelson, David, 11:59
- Re: PDF, Postscript, and "normative" versions (was: Re: Baby Steps (was RE: Alternative formats for IDs)), Robert Sayre, 11:44
- RE: PDF, Postscript, and "normative" versions (was: Re: Baby Steps (was RE: Alternative formats for IDs)), John C Klensin, 09:44
- Re: PDF, Postscript, and "normative" versions (was: Re: Baby Steps (was RE: Alternative formats for IDs)), Stewart Bryant, 07:44
- Re: Alternative formats for IDs, Bill Fenner, 07:31
- Re: Alternative formats for IDs, Bill Fenner, 06:52
- RE: PDF, Postscript, and "normative" versions (was: Re: Baby Steps (was RE: Alternative formats for IDs)), Lars-Erik Jonsson \(LU/EAB\), 04:27
- Re: Normative figures, Stewart Bryant, 04:21
- Re: Venue for Dallas IETF ?, Brian E Carpenter, 04:09
January 11, 2006
- Venue for Dallas IETF ?, John L, 18:46
- Re: Alternative formats for IDs, Dave Crocker, 17:05
- Re: Alternative formats for IDs, Douglas Otis, 16:58
- Re: Alternative formats for IDs, Ned Freed, 16:35
- Re: Alternative formats for IDs, Henrik Levkowetz, 16:01
- Re: Alternative formats for IDs, Henrik Levkowetz, 16:00
- Re: Alternative formats for IDs, Dave Crocker, 15:54
- RE: Alternative formats for IDs, Ned Freed, 15:09
- RE: Alternative formats for IDs, John C Klensin, 14:58
- Re: Accessibility of Documents (veering off-topic), Douglas Otis, 14:51
- RE: Alternative formats for IDs, Bob Braden, 14:12
- RE: Alternative formats for IDs, Bob Braden, 12:54
- Re: Normative figures, Bob Braden, 12:47
- Re: Normative figures, Bob Braden, 12:35
- Re: PDF, Postscript, and "normative" versions (was: Re: Baby Steps (was RE: Alternative formats for IDs)), Bob Braden, 12:07
- Re: Working Group not chartering, johnl, 06:04
- Re: Alternative formats for IDs, Brian E Carpenter, 05:55
- Re: Normative figures, Brian E Carpenter, 05:52
- Re: Normative figures, Stephane Bortzmeyer, 01:27
January 10, 2006
- Re: Accessibility of Documents (veering off-topic), Spencer Dawkins, 22:21
- Re: Accessibility of Documents (veering off-topic), Dave Crocker, 18:48
- RE: Alternative formats for IDs, Brian Rosen, 18:19
- Re: Alternative formats for IDs, Frank Ellermann, 17:56
- Re: Accessibility of Documents (veering off-topic), Lucy E. Lynch, 17:44
- Re: Accessibility of Documents (veering off-topic), John C Klensin, 17:32
- Re: Normative figures, Frank Ellermann, 17:05
- RE: Working Group chartering, Burger, Eric, 16:54
- RE: Working Group chartering, Harald Tveit Alvestrand, 16:25
- Re: Accessibility of Documents (veering off-topic), Spencer Dawkins, 16:03
- Re: Normative figures, Sam Hartman, 14:09
- Accessibility of Documents, Sam Hartman, 12:41
- RE: Working Group chartering, James M. Polk, 11:32
- Re: Trying to invent a way of determining "consensus", Sam Hartman, 11:27
- Re: Working Group chartering, Melinda Shore, 11:26
- RE: Working Group chartering, Burger, Eric, 11:00
- Re: objection to proposed change to "consensus", Sam Hartman, 10:39
- RE: Working Group chartering, Gray, Eric, 10:10
- RE: Normative figures, Gray, Eric, 10:10
- RE: Normative figures, Gray, Eric, 10:10
- Re: Alternative formats for IDs, Randy.Dunlap, 09:33
- Re: Working Group chartering, Dave Crocker, 09:30
- RE: Alternative formats for IDs, Paul Hoffman, 09:29
- Re: Working Group chartering, Dave Crocker, 09:11
- informal survey, Carl Malamud, 09:08
- Re: Working Group chartering, Andy Bierman, 09:05
- RE: Binary Choices?, Gray, Eric, 08:57
- Re: Normative figures, Stephane Bortzmeyer, 08:34
- RE: Alternative formats for IDs, Brian Rosen, 07:54
- RE: Alternative formats for IDs, Brian Rosen, 07:48
- Re: Alternative formats for IDs, Brian E Carpenter, 07:15
- Re: Normative figures, Brian E Carpenter, 07:00
- Re: Alternative formats for IDs, Theodore Ts'o, 06:59
- RE: Alternative formats for IDs, David B Harrington, 06:52
- RE: Alternative formats for IDs, Brian Rosen, 06:12
- Re: Normative figures, Stephane Bortzmeyer, 02:39
- Re: Normative figures, Stephane Bortzmeyer, 02:33
- RE: Working Group chartering, Burger, Eric, 00:14
January 09, 2006
- Re: Normative figures, grenville armitage, 23:59
- Re: Normative figures, Stewart Bryant, 22:09
- Re: Normative figures, Stewart Bryant, 21:44
- Re: Alternative formats for IDs, Theodore Ts'o, 21:38
- Re: Binary Choices?, Theodore Ts'o, 20:44
- Re: objection to proposed change to "consensus", Ned Freed, 19:08
- RE: Normative figures, Gray, Eric, 17:32
- Re: Normative figures, Stewart Bryant, 16:55
- Re: Normative figures, Stewart Bryant, 16:41
- RE: Normative figures, Gray, Eric, 15:38
- Re: Normative figures, Marshall Eubanks, 15:37
- Re: Trying to invent a way of determining "consensus", Dave Crocker, 15:29
- IETF Meeting Survey, Ray Pelletier, 15:12
- Re: Normative figures, Paul Hoffman, 13:41
- RE: Normative figures, Dassa, 13:36
- Re: Normative figures, Ned Freed, 13:02
- RE: Normative figures, Gray, Eric, 12:55
- Re: Normative figures, Stewart Bryant, 12:50
- Re: objection to proposed change to "consensus", Scott W Brim, 12:35
- Re: Normative figures, Stewart Bryant, 12:26
- Re: Normative figures, Sam Hartman, 12:08
- Re: objection to proposed change to "consensus", John C Klensin, 12:06
- Re: Normative figures, Bob Braden, 11:55
- Re: objection to proposed change to "consensus", Stewart Bryant, 11:20
- RE: Binary Choices?, Gray, Eric, 11:01
- Re: Normative figures, Steven M. Bellovin, 11:00
- Re: Normative figures, Stewart Bryant, 11:00
- Re: Accessibility issues affecting IETF document format choices, Sam Hartman, 10:48
- Accessibility issues affecting IETF document format choices, Dave Crocker, 10:10
- Re: objection to proposed change to "consensus", Sam Hartman, 10:00
- Re: Normative figures, Sam Hartman, 09:08
- Re: Normative figures, Scott W Brim, 08:54
- Normative figures, Sam Hartman, 08:44
- Re: objection to proposed change to "consensus", Sam Hartman, 07:36
- Binary Choices?, Sam Hartman, 07:30
- Re: Trying to invent a way of determining "consensus", Brian E Carpenter, 06:19
January 08, 2006
- Re: objection to proposed change to "consensus", Sandy Wills, 18:23
- Re: objection to proposed change to "consensus", Ken Raeburn, 14:04
- RE: Alternative formats for IDs, John C Klensin, 09:40
- RE: Alternative formats for IDs, David B Harrington, 09:12
- RE: Alternative formats for IDs, Yaakov Stein, 05:46
- Re: Engineering our way out of a brown paper bag [Re: Consensus based on reading tea leaves], Marshall Eubanks, 05:33
- RE: Engineering our way out of a brown paper bag [Re: Consensus based on reading tea leaves], Yaakov Stein, 00:29
January 07, 2006
- RE: Alternative formats for IDs, Brian Rosen, 13:23
- Re: objection to proposed change to "consensus", Melinda Shore, 08:17
- RE: Alternative formats for IDs, David B Harrington, 07:37
- Re: Binary choices, polling and so on (Re: objection to proposed change to "consensus"), Scott W Brim, 07:22
- Binary choices, polling and so on (Re: objection to proposed change to "consensus"), Harald Tveit Alvestrand, 07:02
- Re: Trying to invent a way of determining "consensus", JFC (Jefsey) Morfin, 04:41
January 06, 2006
- Re: objection to proposed change to "consensus", grenville armitage, 22:26
- Re: objection to proposed change to "consensus", Sandy Wills, 21:16
- Re: objection to proposed change to "consensus", Sandy Wills, 21:13
- RE: objection to proposed change to "consensus", Gray, Eric, 17:47
- Re: ancients-moderns dispute (was: PDF, Postscript, and "normative" versions (was: Re: Baby Steps (was RE: Alternative formats for IDs))), JFC (Jefsey) Morfin, 17:42
- RE: objection to proposed change to "consensus", Brian Rosen, 15:12
- RE: objection to proposed change to "consensus", Gray, Eric, 14:32
- RE: objection to proposed change to "consensus", Randy.Dunlap, 13:27
- Re: objection to proposed change to "consensus", Stewart Bryant, 12:35
- RE: objection to proposed change to "consensus", Bob Braden, 11:59
- RE: objection to proposed change to "consensus", Gray, Eric, 11:59
- Digression was-Re: objection to proposed change to "consensus", Ted Hardie, 11:28
- RE: objection to proposed change to "consensus", Gray, Eric, 11:26
- RE: objection to proposed change to "consensus", Randy.Dunlap, 11:21
- RE: objection to proposed change to "consensus", Gray, Eric, 11:18
- Re: Baby Steps (was RE: Alternative formats for IDs), Bob Braden, 11:12
- Trying to invent a way of determining "consensus", Sandy Wills, 10:55
- Re: ancients-moderns dispute (was: PDF, Postscript, and "normative" versions (was: Re: Baby Steps (was RE: Alternative formats for IDs))), Bob Braden, 10:53
- Re: ABNF Re: Troubles with UTF-8, Tom Petch, 09:42
- Re: participation sans meeting attendance (was RE: Alternative formats for IDs), Brian E Carpenter, 08:54
- Re: objection to proposed change to "consensus", Sam Hartman, 08:51
- Re: Baby Steps (was RE: Alternative formats for IDs), Brian E Carpenter, 08:50
- Re: Baby Steps (was RE: Alternative formats for IDs), Brian E Carpenter, 08:41
- Experiments as a Gateway to Process Change, Sam Hartman, 08:25
- Re: objection to proposed change to "consensus", Marshall Eubanks, 08:21
- Re: ABNF Re: Troubles with UTF-8, Bill Fenner, 07:51
- Re: objection to proposed change to "consensus", Harald Tveit Alvestrand, 07:28
- Re: objection to proposed change to "consensus", Spencer Dawkins, 07:24
- ancients-moderns dispute (was: PDF, Postscript, and "normative" versions (was: Re: Baby Steps (was RE: Alternative formats for IDs))), JFC (Jefsey) Morfin, 07:12
- Re: objection to proposed change to "consensus", Sandy Wills, 07:06
- Re: objection to proposed change to "consensus", Ken Raeburn, 04:46
January 05, 2006
- Re: Permitting PDF and Postscript, Masataka Ohta, 20:54
- Re: objection to proposed change to "consensus", grenville armitage, 20:23
- Re: objection to proposed change to "consensus", Frank Ellermann, 19:38
- Re: objection to proposed change to "consensus", Sandy Wills, 19:00
- Re: objection to proposed change to "consensus", grenville armitage, 17:04
- Re: objection to proposed change to "consensus", Sandy Wills, 16:41
- Re: objection to proposed change to "consensus", grenville armitage, 15:24
- RE: ABNF Re: Troubles with UTF-8, Misha Wolf, 15:04
- Re: Permitting PDF and Postscript (was: RE: Baby Steps (was RE: Alternative formats for IDs)), Steven M. Bellovin, 14:46
- ABNF Re: Troubles with UTF-8, Tom.Petch, 14:28
- RE: objection to proposed change to "consensus", Gray, Eric, 14:24
- Re: objection to proposed change to "consensus", Sandy Wills, 13:39
- Re: Engineering our way out of a brown paper bag [Re: Consensus b ased on reading tea leaves], Douglas Otis, 13:26
- RE: Engineering our way out of a brown paper bag [Re: Consensus b ased on reading tea leaves], Gray, Eric, 13:22
- RE: Engineering our way out of a brown paper bag [Re: Consensus b ased on reading tea leaves], Gray, Eric, 13:09
- PDF, Postscript, and "normative" versions (was: Re: Baby Steps (was RE: Alternative formats for IDs)), John C Klensin, 13:02
- RE: objection to proposed change to "consensus", Gray, Eric, 12:51
- Re: objection to proposed change to "consensus", Stephen Sprunk, 12:45
- Re: Engineering our way out of a brown paper bag [Re: Consensus b ased on reading tea leaves], John Levine, 12:33
- Permitting PDF and Postscript (was: RE: Baby Steps (was RE: Alternative formats for IDs)), John C Klensin, 12:01
- Re: Baby Steps (was RE: Alternative formats for IDs), Ken Raeburn, 11:52
- RE: Baby Steps (was RE: Alternative formats for IDs), John C Klensin, 11:52
- Re: Engineering our way out of a brown paper bag [Re: Consensus b ased on reading tea leaves], Eliot Lear, 11:36
- Re: Engineering our way out of a brown paper bag [Re: Consensus b ased on reading tea leaves], Stewart Bryant, 11:28
- Re: Alternative formats for IDs, william(at)elan.net, 11:26
- RE: Baby Steps (was RE: Alternative formats for IDs), Gray, Eric, 11:25
- Re: Engineering our way out of a brown paper bag [Re: Consensus b ased on reading tea leaves], Stewart Bryant, 11:24
- Re: Engineering our way out of a brown paper bag [Re: Consensus b ased on reading tea leaves], Brett Thorson, 11:19
- Re: objection to proposed change to "consensus", Sandy Wills, 10:53
- RE: Baby Steps (was RE: Alternative formats for IDs), Gray, Eric, 10:50
- RE: Baby Steps (was RE: Alternative formats for IDs), Gray, Eric, 10:42
- RE: Baby Steps (was RE: Alternative formats for IDs), Ash, Gerald R \(Jerry\), 10:41
- Re: Engineering our way out of a brown paper bag [Re: Consensus b ased on reading tea leaves], Eliot Lear, 10:37
- RE: Engineering our way out of a brown paper bag [Re: Consensus b ased on reading tea leaves], Gray, Eric, 10:33
- Re: Baby Steps (was RE: Alternative formats for IDs), Sandy Wills, 10:29
- Re: Baby Steps (was RE: Alternative formats for IDs), Scott W Brim, 10:06
- Re: Baby Steps (was RE: Alternative formats for IDs), Stewart Bryant, 10:02
- RE: objection to proposed change to "consensus", Gray, Eric, 09:56
- Re: Baby Steps (was RE: Alternative formats for IDs), Stewart Bryant, 09:51
- RE: Alternative formats for IDs, Jeffrey Hutzelman, 09:47
- Re: Baby Steps (was RE: Alternative formats for IDs), John C Klensin, 09:29
- Re: More on the Secretariat Statement of Work (SOW), Brian E Carpenter, 09:02
- Re: Baby Steps (was RE: Alternative formats for IDs), Ken Raeburn, 08:54
- Baby Steps (was RE: Alternative formats for IDs), Ash, Gerald R \(Jerry\), 07:32
- Re: Engineering our way out of a brown paper bag [Re: Consensus based on reading tea leaves], Stewart Bryant, 07:23
- Re: Engineering our way out of a brown paper bag [Re: Consensus based on reading tea leaves], Ralph Droms, 06:26
- Re: Alternative formats for IDs, Peter Dambier, 06:22
- Re: Alternative formats for IDs, Scott Kitterman, 06:17
- Re: bozoproofing the net, was The Value of Reputation, Brian E Carpenter, 06:15
- Engineering our way out of a brown paper bag [Re: Consensus based on reading tea leaves], Brian E Carpenter, 05:39
- RE: Alternative formats for IDs, John C Klensin, 04:17
- RE: Alternative formats for IDs, Ole Jacobsen, 03:10
- Re: objection to proposed change to "consensus", Jari Arkko, 02:26
- RE: Alternative formats for IDs, Lars-Erik Jonsson \(LU/EAB\), 01:27
January 04, 2006
- Re: Alternative formats for IDs, Frank Ellermann, 22:57
- RE: Alternative formats for IDs, Yaakov Stein, 22:13
- RE: Alternative formats for IDs, Yaakov Stein, 21:59
- RE: Alternative formats for IDs, Yaakov Stein, 21:50
- RE: objection to proposed change to "consensus", Yaakov Stein, 21:31
- Re: Alternative formats for IDs, Julian Reschke, 15:16
- Re: bozoproofing DKIM concerns, John Levine, 13:48
- Re: objection to proposed change to "consensus", Spencer Dawkins, 13:46
- Re: Alternative formats for IDs, Stephane Bortzmeyer, 13:37
- Re: Alternative formats for IDs, Stephane Bortzmeyer, 13:34
- Re: Alternative formats for IDs, Scott Kitterman, 13:17
- Re: bozoproofing the net, was The Value of Reputation, Michael Thomas, 12:51
- Likely DKIM endgame, Dave Crocker, 12:51
- Re: Likely DKIM endgame, Eric Rescorla, 12:42
- Re: bozoproofing DKIM concerns, Eric Rescorla, 11:50
- Re: bozoproofing DKIM concerns, Douglas Otis, 11:49
- Re: Alternative formats for IDs, Theodore Ts'o, 11:45
- bozoproofing DKIM concerns, Dave Crocker, 11:02
- RE: Alternative formats for IDs, Gray, Eric, 10:58
- RE: Alternative formats for IDs, Lars-Erik Jonsson \(LU/EAB\), 10:50
- RE: Alternative formats for IDs, Gray, Eric, 10:47
- RE: Alternative formats for IDs, Lars-Erik Jonsson \(LU/EAB\), 10:43
- RE: objection to proposed change to "consensus", Gray, Eric, 10:38
- RE: Alternative formats for IDs, Lars-Erik Jonsson \(LU/EAB\), 10:21
- Re: Alternative formats for IDs, Theodore Ts'o, 10:08
- Re: objection to proposed change to "consensus", Stewart Bryant, 09:23
- Re: bozoproofing the net, was The Value of Reputation, Eric Rescorla, 09:22
- Re: Alternative formats for IDs, Randy.Dunlap, 09:13
- Re: Question about the Neustar logo on www.ietf.org, Sam Hartman, 09:10
- Re: objection to proposed change to "consensus", Brian E Carpenter, 09:05
- Re: WG Review: EAP Method Update (emu), Sam Hartman, 08:59
- Re: bozoproofing the net, was The Value of Reputation, Tony Finch, 08:45
- Re: bozoproofing the net, was The Value of Reputation, Harald Tveit Alvestrand, 08:43
- Re: bozoproofing the net, was The Value of Reputation, John R Levine, 08:36
- Re: bozoproofing the net, was The Value of Reputation, Sam Hartman, 08:30
- Re: bozoproofing the net, was The Value of Reputation, John R Levine, 08:29
- Re: bozoproofing the net, was The Value of Reputation, Sam Hartman, 07:57
- Re: bozoproofing the net, was The Value of Reputation, John Levine, 06:55
- RE: [Ipsec] Last call comments about "Repeated Authentication in IKEv2", Yoav Nir, 06:42
- Re: WG Review: Domain Keys Identified Mail (dkim), Sam Hartman, 06:28
- Re: bozoproofing the net, was The Value of Reputation, Sam Hartman, 05:14
- Alternatives to DKIM, Sam Hartman, 05:02
- Last call comments about "Repeated Authentication in IKEv2", Pasi . Eronen, 02:27
- Re: Alternative formats for IDs, Julian Reschke, 02:04
- Re: Troubles with UTF-8, Masataka Ohta, 00:14
January 03, 2006
- RE: Alternative formats for IDs, Yaakov Stein, 23:21
- Re: Troubles with UTF-8, James Seng, 23:00
- Re: Troubles with UTF-8, Bob Braden, 21:06
- Re: The Value of Reputation, Jim Fenton, 15:46
- Re: The Value of Reputation, John Leslie, 15:29
- optional clip screening in H.323 supplementary service, Daniele Giordano, 15:23
- Re: Question about the Neustar logo on www.ietf.org, JFC (Jefsey) Morfin, 14:56
- Re: The Value of Reputation, Jim Fenton, 14:49
- Re: Alternative formats for IDs, Larry J. Blunk, 13:33
- RE: Alternative formats for IDs, Gray, Eric, 13:15
- RE: Alternative formats for IDs, John C Klensin, 13:01
- RE: Alternative formats for IDs, Ned Freed, 12:58
- Re: WG Review: Domain Keys Identified Mail (dkim), Ned Freed, 12:33
- Working Group chartering, Dave Crocker, 11:15
- Re: Alternative formats for IDs, Randy.Dunlap, 10:36
- Re: Alternative formats for IDs, Stephane Bortzmeyer, 08:48
- Support for cooperative work (Was: Alternative formats for IDs, Stephane Bortzmeyer, 08:47
- Re: WG Review: Domain Keys Identified Mail (dkim), Tony Hansen, 08:08
- Re: WG Review: EAP Method Update (emu), Jari Arkko, 07:40
- RE: IETF Last Call: draft-salowey-tls-ticket-06.txt, Pasi . Eronen, 07:35
- RE: IETF Last Call: draft-salowey-tls-ticket-06.txt, Bernard Aboba, 07:05
- Re: Troubles with UTF-8, Peter Dambier, 06:48
- Re: IETF Last Call: draft-salowey-tls-ticket-06.txt, Bernard Aboba, 06:48
- Re: participation sans meeting attendance (was RE: Alternative formats for IDs), Melinda Shore, 06:39
- Re: WG Review: EAP Method Update (emu), Jari Arkko, 05:26
- Re: IETF Last Call: draft-salowey-tls-ticket-06.txt, Jari Arkko, 04:58
- RE: IETF Last Call: draft-salowey-tls-ticket-06.txt, Pasi . Eronen, 04:29
- RE: IETF Last Call: draft-salowey-tls-ticket-06.txt, Pasi . Eronen, 04:23
- Re: bozoproofing the net, was The Value of Reputation, Stephen Farrell, 03:25
- Re: Alternative formats for IDs, Jari Arkko, 00:04
January 02, 2006
- Re: Alternative formats for IDs, Russ Allbery, 23:57
- RE: Alternative formats for IDs, Harald Tveit Alvestrand, 23:56
- RE: Alternative formats for IDs, John R Levine, 23:53
- RE: Consensus based on reading tea leaves (was: Re: Alternativeformatsfor IDs), Harald Tveit Alvestrand, 23:49
- Diff tools (Was: Re: Alternative formats for IDs), Jari Arkko, 23:37
- RE: Alternative formats for IDs, Yaakov Stein, 23:29
- RE: Alternative formats for IDs, Yaakov Stein, 23:21
- Re: objection to proposed change to "consensus", Jeffrey Hutzelman, 23:05
- Re: Alternative formats for IDs, Randy Presuhn, 23:05
- Re: Alternative formats for IDs, Jeffrey Hutzelman, 23:03
- Re: Alternative formats for IDs, Jeffrey Hutzelman, 23:01
- Re: bozoproofing the net, was The Value of Reputation, Jeffrey Hutzelman, 23:00
- participation sans meeting attendance (was RE: Alternative formats for IDs), Jeffrey Hutzelman, 23:00
- Re: Alternative formats for IDs, Randy.Dunlap, 22:58
- objection to proposed change to "consensus", Randy Presuhn, 22:58
- Re: Alternative formats for IDs, Doug Royer, 22:23
- Re: Alternative formats for IDs, grenville armitage, 22:23
- RE: Alternative formats for IDs, Yaakov Stein, 22:07
- Re: WG Review: Domain Keys Identified Mail (dkim), John Levine, 21:57
- RE: Alternative formats for IDs, Yaakov Stein, 21:57
- Re: bozoproofing the net, was The Value of Reputation, Dave Crocker, 21:55
- RE: Alternative formats for IDs, Yaakov Stein, 21:49
- RE: Alternative formats for IDs, Yaakov Stein, 21:46
- Re: Alternative formats for IDs, Douglas Otis, 17:47
- Re: SIQ, SPF, BATV, etc., Douglas Otis, 17:33
- Re: IETF Last Call: draft-salowey-tls-ticket-06.txt, Bernard Aboba, 17:17
- Re: bozo-proofing the net (or making better bozos?), Bernard Aboba, 17:05
- Re: Question about the Neustar logo on www.ietf.org, John Levine, 16:18
- Re: Question about the Neustar logo on www.ietf.org, Ned Freed, 15:55
- Re: Question about the Neustar logo on www.ietf.org, JFC (Jefsey) Morfin, 15:33
- Re: Alternative formats for IDs, John Levine, 15:28
- RE: Alternative formats for IDs, Ned Freed, 15:22
- Re: Question about the Neustar logo on www.ietf.org, Dave Crocker, 14:53
- Re: Alternative formats for IDs, Tom.Petch, 14:42
- Re: Alternative formats for IDs, John C Klensin, 14:39
- Re: bozo-proofing the net (or making better bozos?), John Levine, 14:37
- Re: Alternative formats for IDs, Marshall Eubanks, 14:06
- RE: Alternative formats for IDs, Noel Chiappa, 13:25
- Re: Question about the Neustar logo on www.ietf.org, John C Klensin, 13:22
- Re: bozoproofing the net, was The Value of Reputation, John C Klensin, 13:12
- RE: Question about the Neustar logo on www.ietf.org, Mark Foster, 12:50
- Re: bozoproofing the net, was The Value of Reputation, Dave Crocker, 12:46
- RE: Alternative formats for IDs, John C Klensin, 12:44
- Re: bozo-proofing the net (or making better bozos?), Bernard Aboba, 12:40
- Re: WG Review: EAP Method Update (emu), Clint Chaplin, 12:23
- Re: Question about the Neustar logo on www.ietf.org, Frank Ellermann, 12:21
- Re: Question about the Neustar logo on www.ietf.org, Scott Bradner, 11:09
- Re: Question about the Neustar logo on www.ietf.org, john . loughney, 10:49
- Re: Question about the Neustar logo on www.ietf.org, john . loughney, 10:48
- Re: Back to chartering DKIM [was bozoproofing the net, was The Value of Reputation], Douglas Otis, 10:36
- [ietf-dkim] Re: WG Review: Domain Keys Identified Mail (dkim), Russ Housley, 09:43
- RE: Alternative formats for IDs, Mr. James W. Laferriere, 09:16
- RE: Consensus based on reading tea leaves (was: Re: Alternativeformatsfor IDs), Yaakov Stein, 09:13
- Re: Question about the Neustar logo on www.ietf.org, Brian E Carpenter, 09:10
- Back to chartering DKIM [was bozoproofing the net, was The Value of Reputation], Tony Hansen, 09:01
- Re: Alternative formats for IDs, Peter Dambier, 08:57
- Re: bozoproofing the IETF process, was bozoproofing the net, John Levine, 08:39
- Re: Question about the Neustar logo on www.ietf.org, Harald Tveit Alvestrand, 08:29
- Re: Question about the Neustar logo on www.ietf.org, Paul Hoffman, 08:26
- RE: Alternative formats for IDs, David B Harrington, 08:20
- Re: Question about the Neustar logo on www.ietf.org, JORDI PALET MARTINEZ, 08:18
- Re: Consensus based on reading tea leaves (was: Re: Alternative formatsfor IDs), Spencer Dawkins, 07:41
- Question about the Neustar logo on www.ietf.org, John Loughney, 07:29
- Re: Alternative formats for IDs, Florian Weimer, 05:48
- Re: Alternative formats for IDs, grenville armitage, 05:43
- RE: Alternative formats for IDs, william(at)elan.net, 05:34
- Re: bozoproofing the net, was The Value of Reputation, Harald Tveit Alvestrand, 05:05
- Re: bozoproofing the net, was The Value of Reputation, Dave Crocker, 04:25
- Re: Alternative formats for IDs, Frank Ellermann, 04:07
- Re: Alternative formats for IDs, Peter Dambier, 03:41
- Re: Alternative formats for IDs, Julian Reschke, 02:56
- Re: bozoproofing the net, was The Value of Reputation, Harald Tveit Alvestrand, 02:56
- RE: Alternative formats for IDs, Yaakov Stein, 02:43
- Re: bozoproofing the net, was The Value of Reputation, Dave Crocker, 01:21
- Re: Troubles with UTF-8, Tim Bray, 00:45
- Re: Troubles with UTF-8, Tim Bray, 00:43
- Re: bozoproofing the net, was The Value of Reputation, Harald Tveit Alvestrand, 00:41
- Re: Troubles with UTF-8, Tim Bray, 00:34
- Re: Alternative formats for IDs, Jari Arkko, 00:20
January 01, 2006
- RE: Consensus based on reading tea leaves (was: Re: Alternative formatsfor IDs), Yaakov Stein, 23:25
- Re: SIQ, SPF, BATV, etc., Frank Ellermann, 22:52
- Re: bozoproofing the net, was The Value of Reputation, John R Levine, 21:14
- Re: SIQ, SPF, BATV, etc., Douglas Otis, 20:31
- Re: bozoproofing the net, was The Value of Reputation, Dave Crocker, 20:31
- Re: bozoproofing the net, was The Value of Reputation, John C Klensin, 19:23
- Re: bozoproofing the net, was The Value of Reputation, Douglas Otis, 16:55
- Re: IETF Last Call: draft-salowey-tls-ticket-06.txt, Bernard Aboba, 16:36
- RE: Alternative formats for IDs, John C Klensin, 14:36
- RE: Alternative formats for IDs, william(at)elan.net, 13:57
- Re: IETF Last Call: draft-salowey-tls-ticket-06.txt, Eric Rescorla, 12:05
- Re: bozoproofing the net, was The Value of Reputation, Dave Crocker, 11:21
- Re: bozoproofing the net, was The Value of Reputation, John R Levine, 10:16
- Re: bozoproofing the net, was The Value of Reputation, John C Klensin, 09:36
- Consensus based on reading tea leaves (was: Re: Alternative formats for IDs), Spencer Dawkins, 07:56
- Re: Alternative formats for IDs, Henrik Levkowetz, 06:40
- Re: Alternative formats for IDs, Frank Ellermann, 06:00
- Re: Alternative formats for IDs, Julian Reschke, 05:37
- Re: Alternative formats for IDs, Julian Reschke, 05:33
- Re: Alternative formats for IDs, Jari Arkko, 04:34
- RE: Alternative formats for IDs, Yaakov Stein, 02:46
- Re: Alternative formats for IDs, Frank Ellermann, 00:49
December 31, 2005
- Re: SIQ, SPF, BATV, etc., Frank Ellermann, 23:50
- Alternative formats for IDs, Yaakov Stein, 23:38
- Re: bozoproofing the net, was The Value of Reputation, John Levine, 23:35