IETF Discussion (date)
February 28, 2006
- RE: Multinational Internet or Balkanization?, JFC (Jefsey) Morfin, 22:12
- RE: Multinational Internet or Balkanization?, Hallam-Baker, Phillip, 20:50
- Re: HOAKEY BoF in Dallas, Yoshihiro Ohba, 19:36
- Multinational Internet or Balkanization?, JFC (Jefsey) Morfin, 17:29
- Re: Last Call: 'Definitions of Managed Objects for Remote Ping, Traceroute, and Lookup Operations' to Proposed Standard, Randy Presuhn, 17:12
- HOAKEY BoF in Dallas, Nakhjiri Madjid-MNAKHJI1, 14:57
- Re: [TLS] Re: Last Call: 'TLS User Mapping Extension' toProposedStandard, Wan-Teh Chang, 14:57
- Re: IETF 65 Streaming effort..., Steven M. Bellovin, 13:20
- IETF 65 Streaming effort..., Joel Jaeggli, 12:41
- Re: [TLS] Re: Last Call: 'TLS User Mapping Extension' toProposedStandard, Eric Rescorla, 11:26
- RE: [TLS] Re: Last Call: 'TLS User Mapping Extension' toProposedStandard, Stefan Santesson, 11:16
- Re: [TLS] Re: Last Call: 'TLS User Mapping Extension' toProposedStandard, Russ Housley, 09:51
- Re: [TLS] Re: Last Call: 'TLS User Mapping Extension' toProposedStandard, Eric Rescorla, 08:51
- Re: [TLS] Re: Last Call: 'TLS User Mapping Extension' toProposedStandard, Russ Housley, 08:43
- Re: [TLS] Re: Last Call: 'TLS User Mapping Extension' toProposedStandard, Eric Rescorla, 08:15
- RE: [TLS] Re: Last Call: 'TLS User Mapping Extension' toProposedStandard, Stefan Santesson, 07:53
- RE: Last Call: 'TLS User Mapping Extension' to Proposed Standard, Stefan Santesson, 07:27
- RE: Last Call: 'TLS User Mapping Extension' to Proposed Standard, Stefan Santesson, 07:26
- RE: [TLS] Re: Last Call: 'TLS User Mapping Extension' to Proposed Standard, Stefan Santesson, 07:12
February 27, 2006
- Re: Last Call: 'Definitions of Managed Objects for Remote Ping, Traceroute, and Lookup Operations' to Proposed Standard, Bill Fenner, 23:49
- Re: and once again for your calendaring pleasure and planning, Joe Touch, 15:31
- Away 02/17-03/03: [Posting of draft-ietf-mpls-over-l2tpv3-01.txt ], Carlos Pignataro, 13:51
- Re: Weekly posting summary for ietf(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org, Thomas Narten, 07:42
- Re: [Gen-art] GenArt LC review of DHCP Server Identifier Override Suboption, Brian E Carpenter, 07:41
- Re: Last Call: 'Definitions of Managed Objects for Remote Ping, Traceroute, and Lookup Operations' to Proposed Standard, JFC (Jefsey) Morfin, 06:17
- Re: Last Call: 'Definitions of Managed Objects for Remote Ping, Traceroute, and Lookup Operations' to Proposed Standard, Juergen Schoenwaelder, 06:14
- Re: Last Call: 'Definitions of Managed Objects for Remote Ping, Traceroute, and Lookup Operations' to Proposed Standard, Tom.Petch, 05:44
- Re: Last Call: 'Definitions of Managed Objects for Remote Ping, Traceroute, and Lookup Operations' to Proposed Standard, John Leslie, 05:13
February 26, 2006
- Re: Last Call: 'Definitions of Managed Objects for Remote Ping, Traceroute, and Lookup Operations' to Proposed Standard, Elwyn Davies, 17:43
- Re: Last Call: 'Definitions of Managed Objects for Remote Ping, Traceroute, and Lookup Operations' to Proposed Standard, Bill Strahm, 16:49
- Re: Last Call: 'Definitions of Managed Objects for Remote Ping, Traceroute, and Lookup Operations' to Proposed Standard, Robert Elz, 04:28
February 25, 2006
- Re: Last Call: 'Definitions of Managed Objects for Remote Ping, Traceroute, and Lookup Operations' to Proposed Standard, Frank Ellermann, 12:53
- Re: Last Call: 'Definitions of Managed Objects for Remote Ping, Traceroute, and Lookup Operations' to Proposed Standard, Randy Presuhn, 12:46
- Re: Last Call: 'Definitions of Managed Objects for Remote Ping, Traceroute, and Lookup Operations' to Proposed Standard, Randy Presuhn, 12:31
- Re: Last Call: 'Definitions of Managed Objects for Remote Ping, Traceroute, and Lookup Operations' to Proposed Standard, Sam Hartman, 11:30
- Re: Last Call: 'Definitions of Managed Objects for Remote Ping, Traceroute, and Lookup Operations' to Proposed Standard, Juergen Schoenwaelder, 10:23
- Re: Last Call: 'Definitions of Managed Objects for Remote Ping, Traceroute, and Lookup Operations' to Proposed Standard, Tom.Petch, 05:22
- RE: Weekly posting summary for ietf(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org, Harald Tveit Alvestrand, 02:05
February 24, 2006
- RE: Weekly posting summary for ietf(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org, Gray, Eric, 13:25
- Re: Weekly posting summary for ietf(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org, Marshall Eubanks, 12:34
- Re: Weekly posting summary for ietf(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org, Rob Austein, 12:30
- Re: Weekly posting summary for ietf(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org, Adrian Farrel, 09:21
- Weekly posting summary for ietf(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org, Thomas Narten, 07:38
February 23, 2006
- RE: [Pppext] Re: Last Call: 'Accommodating an MTU/MRUgreaterthan1492in PPPoE' to Informational RFC, Pekka Savola, 23:49
- RE: [Pppext] Re: Last Call: 'Accommodating an MTU/MRUgreaterthan1492in PPPoE' to Informational RFC, Jerome Moisand, 15:17
- RE: [Pppext] Re: Last Call: 'Accommodating an MTU/MRU greaterthan1492in PPPoE' to Informational RFC, James Carlson, 15:17
- Re: USG "Request for Information" on the IANA, JFC (Jefsey) Morfin, 13:17
- RE: [Pppext] Re: Last Call: 'Accommodating an MTU/MRU greaterthan1492in PPPoE' to Informational RFC, Jerome Moisand, 08:56
- RE: Agenda of China workshop about Next Generatoin Internet, DENG, HUI -HCHBJ, 07:47
- Agenda of China workshop about Next Generatoin Internet, DENG, HUI -HCHBJ, 07:33
- Re: USG "Request for Information" on the IANA, Brian E Carpenter, 07:32
- USG "Request for Information" on the IANA, Stephane Bortzmeyer, 06:51
- IESG Transport Area Director Call for Nominees, Ralph Droms, 06:09
- and once again for your calendaring pleasure and planning, Eliot Lear, 05:20
- Re: xml2rfc updates, Bill Fenner, 01:26
- RE: [Pppext] Re: Last Call: 'Accommodating an MTU/MRU greater than1492in PPPoE' to Informational RFC, Pekka Savola, 00:42
February 22, 2006
- Re: IESG Statement on disruptive posting, Sam Hartman, 20:53
- xml2rfc updates, Mark Andrews, 20:41
- Re: IESG Statement on disruptive posting, JFC (Jefsey) Morfin, 20:19
- Re: IESG Statement on disruptive posting, JFC (Jefsey) Morfin, 19:46
- RE: [TLS] Re: Last Call: 'TLS User Mapping Extension' to ProposedStandard, Russ Housley, 18:56
- RE: 'monotonic increasing', Gray, Eric, 16:09
- Re: IESG Statement on disruptive posting, Sam Hartman, 15:56
- Re: 'monotonic increasing', Tom.Petch, 14:58
- NomCom 2005-2006 Announcement, Ralph Droms, 13:50
- RE: IESG Statement on disruptive posting, Gray, Eric, 10:10
- Re: IESG Statement on disruptive posting, JFC (Jefsey) Morfin, 09:08
- Visa waivers, or not, Brian E Carpenter, 02:13
- Re: What's an experiment?, Brian E Carpenter, 00:45
- Re: IESG Statement on disruptive posting, Brian E Carpenter, 00:45
February 21, 2006
- Re: I-D ACTION:draft-alvestrand-ipod-00.txt, JFC (Jefsey) Morfin, 21:43
- Re: IESG Response to JFC Morfin's appeal regarding suspension of posting privileges to the ietf-languages mailing list, nick . staff, 21:06
- RE: Last Call: 'TLS User Mapping Extension' to Proposed Standard, Russ Housley, 19:40
- Re: I-D ACTION:draft-alvestrand-ipod-00.txt, Frank Ellermann, 14:53
- Re: Last Call: 'TLS User Mapping Extension' to Proposed Standard, Bernard Aboba, 14:24
- Re: [Pppext] Re: Last Call: 'Accommodating an MTU/MRU greater than 1492 in PPPoE' to Informational RFC, James Carlson, 13:37
- RE: [Pppext] Re: Last Call: 'Accommodating an MTU/MRU greater than1492 in PPPoE' to Informational RFC, James Carlson, 13:37
- implementation of DSR protocol based energy, amar amar, 13:36
- Re: IESG Statement on disruptive posting, Jefsey Morfin, 13:36
- Re: [Pppext] Re: Last Call: 'Accommodating an MTU/MRU greater than 1492 in PPPoE' to Informational RFC, James Carlson, 13:36
- RE: [TLS] Re: Last Call: 'TLS User Mapping Extension' to ProposedStandard, Ari Medvinsky, 13:36
- RE: [Pppext] Re: Last Call: 'Accommodating an MTU/MRU greater than1492 in PPPoE' to Informational RFC, Veera Tubati \(vtubati\), 13:36
- RE: [Pppext] Re: Last Call: 'Accommodating an MTU/MRU greater than1492 in PPPoE' to Informational RFC, Veera Tubati \(vtubati\), 13:36
- RE: [Pppext] Re: Last Call: 'Accommodating an MTU/MRU greater than1492 in PPPoE' to Informational RFC, Veera Tubati \(vtubati\), 13:36
- RE: [Pppext] Re: Last Call: 'Accommodating an MTU/MRU greater than1492 in PPPoE' to Informational RFC, James Carlson, 13:36
- RE: [Pppext] Re: Last Call: 'Accommodating an MTU/MRU greater than1492 in PPPoE' to Informational RFC, James Carlson, 13:36
- RE: [Pppext] Re: Last Call: 'Accommodating an MTU/MRU greater than1492 in PPPoE' to Informational RFC, James Carlson, 13:36
- RE: [TLS] Re: Last Call: 'TLS User Mapping Extension' to ProposedStandard, Pasi.Eronen, 08:05
- Re: 'monotonic increasing', Frank Ellermann, 08:04
- Re: 'monotonic increasing', Marshall Eubanks, 06:24
- Re: [RFC 959] FTP in ASCII mode, Peter Dambier, 06:12
- Gen-art review of draft-hartman-mailinglist-experiment-01.txt, Elwyn Davies, 04:26
- Re: [RFC 959] FTP in ASCII mode, Sandeep Srivastava, 04:07
- Re: [RFC 959] FTP in ASCII mode, Frank Ellermann, 02:45
- Re: 'monotonic increasing', Frank Ellermann, 02:16
- Re: [RFC 959] FTP in ASCII mode, John C Klensin, 01:39
- Re: [RFC 959] FTP in ASCII mode, Sandeep Srivastava, 00:33
February 20, 2006
- Re: [RFC 959] FTP in ASCII mode, Masataka Ohta, 21:38
- RE: IESG Statement on disruptive posting, JFC (Jefsey) Morfin, 19:45
- RE: 'monotonic increasing', Gray, Eric, 13:07
- RE: appeal to the IESG against an IESG decision, Gray, Eric, 12:55
- RE: Last Call: 'TLS User Mapping Extension' to Proposed Standard, Gray, Eric, 12:38
- Re: Is round-trip time no longer a concern?, Dave Crocker, 12:29
- RE: IESG Statement on disruptive posting, Gray, Eric, 10:59
- Re: [RFC 959] FTP in ASCII mode, John C Klensin, 10:43
- Re: Is round-trip time no longer a concern?, Steven M. Bellovin, 10:36
- RE: 'monotonic increasing', Hallam-Baker, Phillip, 10:28
- Re: Is round-trip time no longer a concern?, Tony Finch, 10:17
- Re: [RFC 959] FTP in ASCII mode, John C Klensin, 09:50
- Re: What's an experiment?, Eliot Lear, 09:47
- Re: Is round-trip time no longer a concern?, Eric Rescorla, 09:46
- Re: Is round-trip time no longer a concern?, Dave Crocker, 09:32
- Re: [RFC 959] FTP in ASCII mode, Peter Dambier, 09:32
- Re: Is round-trip time no longer a concern?, Dave Cridland, 09:24
- RE: 'monotonic increasing', Yaakov Stein, 09:15
- RE: What's an experiment?, Hallam-Baker, Phillip, 09:13
- Re: Is round-trip time no longer a concern?, Keith Moore, 09:12
- Re: 'monotonic increasing', Tom.Petch, 08:49
- Re: Is round-trip time no longer a concern?, Eric Rescorla, 08:19
- [RFC 959] FTP in ASCII mode, Sandeep Srivastava, 06:27
- RE: Last Call: 'TLS User Mapping Extension' to Proposed Standard, Pasi.Eronen, 05:58
- RE: Nomination for the appointment of a Languages Subtags Reviewer, Scott Hollenbeck, 05:09
- Re: Is round-trip time no longer a concern?, Peter Dambier, 04:32
- Re: Is round-trip time no longer a concern?, Harald Tveit Alvestrand, 03:39
- Re: Is round-trip time no longer a concern? (was: Re: Last Call: 'TLS User ...), Dave Cridland, 03:00
February 19, 2006
- Nomination for the appointment of a Languages Subtags Reviewer, JFC (Jefsey) Morfin, 22:25
- appeal to the IESG against an IESG decision, JFC (Jefsey) Morfin, 21:33
- Re: Last Call: 'TLS User Mapping Extension' to Proposed Standard, Bill Strahm, 18:23
- Re: Is round-trip time no longer a concern? (was: Re: Last Call: 'TLS User ...), Steven M. Bellovin, 16:52
- Re: Is round-trip time no longer a concern?, Russ Allbery, 16:40
- Is round-trip time no longer a concern? (was: Re: Last Call: 'TLS User ...), Dave Crocker, 16:27
- Re: Last Call: 'TLS User Mapping Extension' to Proposed Standard, Russ Housley, 15:27
- Re: Last Call: 'TLS User Mapping Extension' to Proposed Standard, Russ Housley, 12:52
- Re: What's an experiment?, Frank Ellermann, 03:09
- Re: IESG Statement on disruptive posting, Brian E Carpenter, 01:07
February 18, 2006
- RE: 'monotonic increasing', Yaakov Stein, 23:15
- Re: Last Call: 'TLS User Mapping Extension' to Proposed Standard, Bill Fenner, 22:42
- Re: Last Call: 'TLS User Mapping Extension' to Proposed Standard, Steven M. Bellovin, 20:35
- Re: What's an experiment?, JFC (Jefsey) Morfin, 19:48
- Re: Last Call: 'TLS User Mapping Extension' to Proposed Standard, Eric Rescorla, 18:35
- Re: IETF65 hotel location, Stephen Sprunk, 18:35
- Re: What's an experiment?, Andrew Newton, 13:42
- Re: 'monotonic increasing', Joe Touch, 12:00
- Re: What's an experiment?, Frank Ellermann, 10:14
- Re: What's an experiment?, Eliot Lear, 10:09
- RE: What's an experiment?, Hallam-Baker, Phillip, 10:06
- RE: What's an experiment?, Hallam-Baker, Phillip, 10:05
February 17, 2006
- Re: IESG Statement on disruptive posting, Sam Hartman, 19:58
- Re: IESG Statement on disruptive posting, Sam Hartman, 19:21
- Re: 'monotonic increasing', Ken Raeburn, 16:15
- Re: 'monotonic increasing', Tom.Petch, 15:13
- Re: [Pppext] Re: Last Call: 'Accommodating an MTU/MRU greater than 1492 in PPPoE' to Informational RFC, Pekka Savola, 15:02
- Re: 'monotonic increasing', Elwyn Davies, 14:15
- Re: Last Call: 'Accommodating an MTU/MRU greater than 1492 in PPPoE' to Informational RFC, Pekka Savola, 14:01
- Re: 'monotonic increasing', Francis Dupont, 13:40
- Re: 'monotonic increasing', Tom.Petch, 13:02
- Re: IESG Statement on disruptive posting, Sam Hartman, 12:29
- Re: 'monotonic increasing', Elwyn Davies, 12:22
- Re: 'monotonic increasing', Henrik Levkowetz, 11:43
- Re: 'monotonic increasing', Frank Ellermann, 11:40
- Re: IESG Statement on disruptive posting, JFC (Jefsey) Morfin, 11:25
- Re: 'monotonic increasing', Ken Raeburn, 10:50
- 'monotonic increasing', Tom.Petch, 10:26
- Re: What's an experiment?, Eliot Lear, 08:52
- Re: What's an experiment?, Joe Baptista, 08:47
February 16, 2006
- Re: What's an experiment?, Eric A. Hall, 15:31
- RE: What's an experiment?, Christian Huitema, 14:35
- unsubscribe, Vij, Bhavna, 13:30
- Re: Last Call: 'Experimental Procedure for Long Term Suspensions from Mailing Lists' to Experimental RFC, Ned Freed, 13:06
- Re: What's an experiment?, Joe Touch, 12:04
- Re: What's an experiment?, JFC (Jefsey) Morfin, 08:36
- Re: What's an experiment?, Peter Dambier, 07:55
- Re: Last Call: 'Experimental Procedure for Long Term Suspensions from Mailing Lists' to Experimental RFC, Brian E Carpenter, 06:38
- Re: What's an experiment?, Eric A. Hall, 06:23
- Re: What's an experiment?, Joe Baptista, 06:22
February 15, 2006
- Re: What's an experiment?, JFC (Jefsey) Morfin, 19:26
- Third Call for Nominations: IETF-Selected ISOC Trustee, Leslie Daigle, 19:18
- Re: Last Call: 'Experimental Procedure for Long Term Suspensions from Mailing Lists' to Experimental RFC, Sam Hartman, 17:14
- Re: What's an experiment?, william(at)elan.net, 15:49
- Re: Last Call: 'Experimental Procedure for Long Term Suspensions from Mailing Lists' to Experimental RFC, Frank Ellermann, 15:10
- Re: What's an experiment?, Spencer Dawkins, 15:01
- Re: What's an experiment?, william(at)elan.net, 14:38
- Re: Last Call: 'Experimental Procedure for Long Term Suspensions from Mailing Lists' to Experimental RFC, Harald Tveit Alvestrand, 14:25
- Re: Last Call: 'Experimental Procedure for Long Term Suspensions from Mailing Lists' to Experimental RFC, Spencer Dawkins, 13:35
- Re: What's an experiment?, Frank Ellermann, 13:22
- RE: What's an experiment?, Brian Rosen, 12:39
- Re: What's an experiment?, Joe Touch, 10:23
- Re: What's an experiment?, Robert Sayre, 10:18
- Re: What's an experiment?, Eliot Lear, 09:45
- Re: Document Action: 'US Secure Hash Algorithms (SHA and HMAC-SHA)' to Informational RFC, Spencer Dawkins, 08:25
- Re: Document Action: 'US Secure Hash Algorithms (SHA and HMAC-SHA)' to Informational RFC, Russ Housley, 08:21
- What's an experiment?, Brian E Carpenter, 08:11
- Re: Document Action: 'US Secure Hash Algorithms (SHA and HMAC-SHA)' to Informational RFC, Sam Hartman, 07:54
- Re: Document Action: 'US Secure Hash Algorithms (SHA and HMAC-SHA)' to Informational RFC, Brian E Carpenter, 02:25
February 14, 2006
- Re: udp source address change, Mark Andrews, 15:24
- Re: Document Action: 'US Secure Hash Algorithms (SHA and HMAC-SHA)' to Informational RFC, Sam Hartman, 12:59
- Re: udp source address change, Joe Touch, 09:48
- Re: Document Action: 'US Secure Hash Algorithms (SHA and HMAC-SHA)' to Informational RFC, Simon Josefsson, 07:29
- Re: Document Action: 'US Secure Hash Algorithms (SHA and HMAC-SHA)' to Informational RFC, Brian E Carpenter, 06:48
- RE: IETF 65 BOF Announcement: Digital Identity Exchange (DIX), Hollenbeck, Scott, 05:43
- RE: IETF 65 BOF Announcement: Digital Identity Exchange (DIX), Hallam-Baker, Phillip, 01:42
February 13, 2006
- Re: IETF 65 BOF Announcement: Digital Identity Exchange (DIX), Dave Crocker, 22:50
- 2nd announcement: IETF Liaison to IEEE 802.1, Bernard Aboba, 21:56
- Re: Knowing what BOFs are being thought about, Frank Ellermann, 19:47
- Re: IETF 65 BOF Announcement: Digital Identity Exchange (DIX), Jeff . Hodges, 19:44
- Re: IETF 65 BOF Announcement: Digital Identity Exchange (DIX), Jeff . Hodges, 19:18
- RE: IETF 65 BOF Announcement: Digital Identity Exchange (DIX), Gray, Eric, 18:10
- Re: Knowing what BOFs are being thought about, Spencer Dawkins, 15:31
- Re: Knowing what BOFs are being thought about, Thomas Narten, 11:41
- RE: IETF 65 BOF Announcement: Digital Identity Exchange (DIX), Hallam-Baker, Phillip, 11:07
- RE: IETF 65 BOF Announcement: Digital Identity Exchange (DIX), Hallam-Baker, Phillip, 10:03
- Re: IETF 65 BOF Announcement: Digital Identity Exchange (DIX), Dave Crocker, 09:40
- Re: IETF 65 BOF Announcement: Digital Identity Exchange (DIX), RL 'Bob' Morgan, 09:31
- Re: IETF 65 BOF Announcement: Digital Identity Exchange (DIX), Richard Shockey, 09:27
- Re: IETF 65 BOF Announcement: Digital Identity Exchange (DIX), Richard Shockey, 09:25
- RE: IETF 65 BOF Announcement: Digital Identity Exchange (DIX), Hollenbeck, Scott, 08:49
- RE: IETF 65 BOF Announcement: Digital Identity Exchange (DIX), Hallam-Baker, Phillip, 08:32
- Re: IETF 65 BOF Announcement: Digital Identity Exchange (DIX), Dave Crocker, 08:07
- RE: IETF 65 BOF Announcement: Digital Identity Exchange (DIX), Hallam-Baker, Phillip, 06:44
- RE: IETF 65 BOF Announcement: Digital Identity Exchange (DIX), Hollenbeck, Scott, 05:33
- Re: IETF 65 BOF Announcement: Digital Identity Exchange (DIX), Jari Arkko, 02:58
February 12, 2006
- Re: IETF 65 BOF Announcement: Digital Identity Exchange (DIX), Dave Crocker, 19:15
- Re: IETF 65 BOF Announcement: Digital Identity Exchange (DIX), Steven M. Bellovin, 19:12
- Re: IETF 65 BOF Announcement: Digital Identity Exchange (DIX), JFC (Jefsey) Morfin, 19:11
- RE: IETF 65 BOF Announcement: Digital Identity Exchange (DIX), Hollenbeck, Scott, 18:58
- Re: IETF 65 BOF Announcement: Digital Identity Exchange (DIX), Steven M. Bellovin, 18:45
- RE: IETF 65 BOF Announcement: Digital Identity Exchange (DIX), Hallam-Baker, Phillip, 18:40
- Re: IETF 65 BOF Announcement: Digital Identity Exchange (DIX), Dave Crocker, 17:47
- Re: IETF 65 BOF Announcement: Digital Identity Exchange (DIX), Steven M. Bellovin, 17:22
- Re: udp source address change, Masataka Ohta, 04:33
February 11, 2006
- Re: udp source address change, Wes Hardaker, 22:31
- Re: Document Action: 'US Secure Hash Algorithms (SHA and HMAC-SHA)' to Informational RFC, Tony Hansen, 21:00
- Re: Document Action: 'US Secure Hash Algorithms (SHA and HMAC-SHA)' to Informational RFC, Sam Hartman, 11:48
- Re: Document Action: 'US Secure Hash Algorithms (SHA and HMAC-SHA)' to Informational RFC, Simon Josefsson, 09:05
- Re: Document Action: 'US Secure Hash Algorithms (SHA and HMAC-SHA)' to Informational RFC, Brian E Carpenter, 08:51
- Re: Knowing what BOFs are being thought about, Frank Ellermann, 02:16
February 10, 2006
- RE: IETF 65 BOF Announcement: Digital Identity Exchange (DIX), Hallam-Baker, Phillip, 20:24
- Re: udp source address change, Masataka Ohta, 18:29
- Re: Knowing what BOFs are being thought about, Spencer Dawkins, 13:51
- Re: Knowing what BOFs are being thought about [was: Re: IETF 65 BOF Announcement: Digital Identity Exchange (DIX)], Dave Crocker, 13:30
- Knowing what BOFs are being thought about [was: Re: IETF 65 BOF Announcement: Digital Identity Exchange (DIX)], Elwyn Davies, 12:06
- Re: Request to the IAB for clarifiction of its Jan 31 IAB Response to Appeal from Jefsey Morfin, Leslie Daigle, 11:10
- RE: IETF 65 BOF Announcement: Digital Identity Exchange (DIX), Scott Hollenbeck, 08:51
- Re: IETF 65 BOF Announcement: Digital Identity Exchange (DIX), Richard Shockey, 08:42
- Re: udp source address change, Wes Hardaker, 08:05
February 08, 2006
- [spf-discuss] Re: Appeal of the IESG decision to publish draft-lyon-senderid-core-01 in conflict with referenced draft-schlitt-spf-classic-02, Leslie Daigle, 15:46
- [spf-discuss] Appeal of the IESG decision to publish draft-lyon-senderid-core-01 in conflict with referenced draft-schlitt-spf-classic-02, Julian Mehnle, 15:13
- Re: Meeting Survey Results, Spencer Dawkins, 11:03
- Re: Document Action: 'US Secure Hash Algorithms (SHA and HMAC-SHA)' to Informational RFC, Simon Josefsson, 02:02
- Request to the IAB for clarifiction of its Jan 31 IAB Response to Appeal from Jefsey Morfin, Harald Tveit Alvestrand, 00:22
February 07, 2006
- Re: Document Action: 'US Secure Hash Algorithms (SHA and HMAC-SHA)' to Informational RFC, Tony Hansen, 20:27
- Re: Document Action: 'US Secure Hash Algorithms (SHA and HMAC-SHA)' to Informational RFC, Steven M. Bellovin, 14:33
- Re: Document Action: 'US Secure Hash Algorithms (SHA and HMAC-SHA)' to Informational RFC, Jeffrey Hutzelman, 13:50
- Re: Document Action: 'US Secure Hash Algorithms (SHA and HMAC-SHA)' to Informational RFC, Joe Touch, 12:32
- udp source address change, mharrima101 (sent by Nabble.com), 11:24
- Re: Document Action: 'US Secure Hash Algorithms (SHA and HMAC-SHA)' to Informational RFC, Russ Housley, 10:33
- Re: Document Action: 'US Secure Hash Algorithms (SHA and HMAC-SHA)' to Informational RFC, Sam Hartman, 10:06
- Re: Document Action: 'US Secure Hash Algorithms (SHA and HMAC-SHA)' to Informational RFC, Pekka Savola, 09:43
- Re: Document Action: 'US Secure Hash Algorithms (SHA and HMAC-SHA)' to Informational RFC, Russ Housley, 09:07
- Re: Document Action: 'US Secure Hash Algorithms (SHA and HMAC-SHA)' to Informational RFC, Paul Hoffman, 08:51
- Re: Document Action: 'US Secure Hash Algorithms (SHA and HMAC-SHA)' to Informational RFC, Russ Housley, 08:06
February 06, 2006
- Re: Document Action: 'US Secure Hash Algorithms (SHA and HMAC-SHA)' to Informational RFC, Jeffrey Hutzelman, 21:35
- Re: Document Action: 'US Secure Hash Algorithms (SHA and HMAC-SHA)' to Informational RFC, Sam Hartman, 19:03
- Re: Document Action: 'US Secure Hash Algorithms (SHA and HMAC-SHA)' to Informational RFC, Steven M. Bellovin, 18:24
- Re: Document Action: 'US Secure Hash Algorithms (SHA and HMAC-SHA)' to Informational RFC, Simon Josefsson, 16:58
- Mailing list experiment draft updated, Sam Hartman, 15:58
- Re: Call for input: draft-hartman-mailinglist-experiment-00.txt, Frank Ellermann, 09:20
- Re: Call for input: draft-hartman-mailinglist-experiment-00.txt, Spencer Dawkins, 07:52
February 02, 2006
- RE: I-D ACTION: draft-ash-alt-formats-01.txt, Yaakov Stein, 11:11
- RE: I-D ACTION: draft-ash-alt-formats-01.txt, Gray, Eric, 10:50
- RE: IAB Response to Appeal from Jefsey Morfin, Ed Juskevicius, 10:37
- Weekly posting summary for ietf(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org, Thomas Narten, 09:13
- Re: Fairness and changing rules, Theodore Ts'o, 08:12
- RE: IAB Response to Appeal from Jefsey Morfin, Bernard Aboba, 08:10
- RE: I-D ACTION: draft-ash-alt-formats-01.txt, Yaakov Stein, 07:27
- Re: I-D ACTION: draft-ash-alt-formats-01.txt, Spencer Dawkins, 05:58
- RE: I-D ACTION: draft-ash-alt-formats-01.txt, Yaakov Stein, 01:44
February 01, 2006
- Re: Last Call: 'Experimental Values In IPv4, IPv6, ICMPv4, ICMPv6, UDP and TCP Headers' to Proposed Standard, Geoff Huston, 17:02
- Re: Last Call: 'Cryptographically Generated Addresses (CGA) Extension Field Format' to Proposed Standard, Geoff Huston, 16:55
- IETF Liaison to IEEE 802.1, Bernard Aboba, 10:02
- Re: Call for input: draft-hartman-mailinglist-experiment-00.txt, JFC (Jefsey) Morfin, 10:02
- Re: Call for input: draft-hartman-mailinglist-experiment-00.txt, Harald Tveit Alvestrand, 00:06
- how do we feel about it, nick . staff, 00:06