I agree.
/jim
-----Original Message-----
From: owner-shim6(_at_)psg(_dot_)com [mailto:owner-shim6(_at_)psg(_dot_)com]
On
Behalf Of Patrick W. Gilmore
Sent: Sunday, April 16, 2006 12:10 AM
To: Iljitsch van Beijnum
Cc: Patrick W. Gilmore; shim6-wg; ppml(_at_)arin(_dot_)net;
global-v6(_at_)lists(_dot_)apnic(_dot_)net; IETF Discussion;
address-policy-wg(_at_)ripe(_dot_)net; v6ops(_at_)ops(_dot_)ietf(_dot_)org
Subject: Re: [narten(_at_)us(_dot_)ibm(_dot_)com: PI addressing in IPv6
advances in ARIN]
On Apr 14, 2006, at 11:07 AM, Iljitsch van Beijnum wrote:
On 14-apr-2006, at 16:57, Scott Leibrand wrote:
60 voted in favor of moving forward with PI. 6 voted against.
Wow, 10 to 1. Amazing.
Even more amazing: 60 people who represent nobody but their own
paycheck get to blow up the internet.
Where is ICANN when you need it? This little experiment in
playground
democracy has to end before people get hurt.
Wow, Iljitsch, I have never lost so much respect so quickly for
someone who was not flaming a specific person or using profanity.
Congratulations.
Back on topic, it is not just those 60 people - the "playground"
appears to overwhelmingly agree with their position. I know I do.
I am sorry your technical arguments have not persuaded us in
the past. But I would urge you to stick to those, or at
least consider why we remain unconvinced, rather than devolve
into .. whatever that post was supposed to be.
--
TTFN,
patrick
_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf