*> "People should refrain from allowing their passion for precise
*> terminology usage to prevent essential communication from
*> ever taking place"
That statement incorporates an assumption that is not true. I vaguely
recall that you can prove anything starting from a false premise.
*> - is a far cry from -
*> "Nit-picking is prohibited."
Your choice of the emotion-packed word "nit-picking" reveals that you and
I cannot have a sensible discussion. Is a bug in a programs a nit? Is
bad English grammar a nit? Is ambiguous prose or terminology a nit?
Ietf mailing list