Julian Reschke wrote:
Joe Touch schrieb:
Stephane Bortzmeyer wrote:
On Thu, Jun 15, 2006 at 09:01:22AM -0700,
Joe Touch <touch(_at_)ISI(_dot_)EDU> wrote a message of 34 lines which
IMHO, IETF should always publish the "source" of its documents
(the current RFC process is far from perfect in that respect).
The source. The author certainly knows it (yes, I'm aware that the RFC
editor performs changes which are not backported in the author's copy,
a really annoying thing; that's why I said the current process is
That's part of the problem. The other is that 'source' is useful only
with a snapshot of the tools that are used to process it. XML2RFC is a
moving target in that regard, as is Word.
Re XML2RFC: why do you need a snapshot if future development produces
versions that continue to implement the semantics defined in RFC2629?
It doesn't use 2329; it extends it based on its unofficial successor
(see the web pages).
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Ietf mailing list