On Thursday, July 20, 2006 11:02:23 AM -0700 todd glassey
By the way - why would the IETF figure that something it wrote in IPR or
Network or any other WG would be legally binding on ISOC and its BOT???
Heh. "Network" isn't an IETF working group; the phrase "Network Working
Group" at the top of RFC's is a historical nod to the group that started
In this particular case, we expect the appeals process to be binding upon
ISOC and it's board because it was approved by that board, as all IETF
process documents must be.
Before you start spouting audit-speak at us and quoting practices which
were not intended for an organization like the IETF and are not relevant to
it, you could at least do your homework.
-- Jeffrey T. Hutzelman (N3NHS) <jhutz+(_at_)cmu(_dot_)edu>
Sr. Research Systems Programmer
School of Computer Science - Research Computing Facility
Carnegie Mellon University - Pittsburgh, PA
Ietf mailing list