Re: As Promised, an attempt at 2026bis2006-09-27 21:35:18
Eliot Lear wrote:
we will find another list for this purpose.
Please consider to pick an existing list like pesci or newtrk or similar, creating new lists for everything is just bad.
2026 must be revised and not merely updated
Your points (4) to (7) sound good, but not (1) to (3). I've not yet read it, is your draft based on a state after Brian's "IETF dispute draft" extracted the appeals stuff ?
Take for example RFCs 82 and 28.
A 2822bis DS shouldn't be too difficult, unless it's the big one integrating MIME (Bruce proposed this IIRC). Matter of taste, many small steps can be confusing, and one giant step could take years (and fail).
Thanks, that helps. Frank _______________________________________________ Ietf mailing list Ietf(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf