<Pasi(_dot_)Eronen(_at_)nokia(_dot_)com> writes:
Eric Rescorla wrote:
My TLS co-chair suggests that this document should go forward as
Experimental. I see two problems with that. First: it assigns code
points out of a space which is reserved for Standards Action.
A correction: the draft needs code points from two different
registries (TLS extension types and TLS supplemental data type);
both of these registries have at least part of the numbers reserved
for "IETF Consensus" policy. So Standards Action is not needed.
I have to agree with my co-chair and disagree with myself. :)
A standards action is not needed...
-Ekr
_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf