IETF Discussion (date)
June 30, 2007
- Re: chicago IETF IPv6 connectivity, Keith Moore, 21:50
- RE: chicago IETF IPv6 connectivity, Michel Py, 20:42
- Re: chicago IETF IPv6 connectivity, Fred Baker, 19:59
- Re: chicago IETF IPv6 connectivity, Jun-ichiro itojun Hagino, 19:44
- Re: chicago IETF IPv6 connectivity, Dave Crocker, 19:42
- Re: chicago IETF IPv6 connectivity, Noel Chiappa, 19:24
- Re: chicago IETF IPv6 connectivity, Bob Hinden, 18:52
- What about the SMS URI?, Daniel Aleksandersen, 13:20
- Should not URIs be resources and not actions, Daniel Aleksandersen, 13:20
June 28, 2007
- Last Call: draft-ietf-dkim-ssp-requirements (Requirements for a DKIM Signing Practices Protocol) to Informational RFC, Douglas Otis, 21:31
- Re: Should I* opinions be afforded a special status? (Re: [saag] Declining the ifare bof for Chicago), Ralph Droms, 07:08
- Re: Should I* opinions be afforded a special status? (Re: [saag] Declining the ifare bof for Chicago), Michael Thomas, 06:52
- Re: IESG workload problem (Re: Should I* opinions be afforded a special status? ), Joe Touch, 06:12
- Re: Should I* opinions be afforded a special status? (Re: [saag] Declining the ifare bof for Chicago), Brian E Carpenter, 01:52
- Re: Should I* opinions be afforded a special status? (Re: [saag] Declining the ifare bof for Chicago), Brian E Carpenter, 00:20
June 27, 2007
- IESG workload problem (Re: Should I* opinions be afforded a special status? ), Harald Alvestrand, 23:35
- Re: Should I* opinions be afforded a special status? (Re: [saag] Declining the ifare bof for Chicago), Michael Thomas, 08:39
- Re: Should I* opinions be afforded a special status? (Re: [saag] Declining the ifare bof for Chicago), Keith Moore, 08:23
- Re: Should I* opinions be afforded a special status? (Re: [saag] Declining the ifare bof for Chicago), Joe Touch, 08:07
- Re: Should I* opinions be afforded a special status? (Re: [saag] Declining the ifare bof for Chicago), Brian E Carpenter, 07:51
- Re: Should I* opinions be afforded a special status? (Re: [saag] Declining the ifare bof for Chicago), Joe Touch, 06:54
- Re: Should I* opinions be afforded a special status? (Re: [saag] Declining the ifare bof for Chicago), Keith Moore, 06:35
- Re: Should I* opinions be afforded a special status? (Re: [saag] Declining the ifare bof for Chicago), Joe Touch, 06:20
- Re: Should I* opinions be afforded a special status? (Re: [saag] Declining the ifare bof for Chicago), Brian E Carpenter, 01:27
June 21, 2007
- Re: Last Call: draft-hutzler-spamops (Email Submission: Access and Accountability) to BCP, Tony Finch, 11:08
- Re: Last Call: draft-hutzler-spamops (Email Submission: Access and Accountability) to BCP, John C Klensin, 10:41
- Re: Last Call: draft-hutzler-spamops (Email Submission: Access and Accountability) to BCP, Tony Finch, 10:17
- Re: Last Call: draft-hutzler-spamops (Email Submission: Access and Accountability) to BCP, John C Klensin, 10:02
- Re: Last Call: draft-hutzler-spamops (Email Submission: Access and Accountability) to BCP, Dave Crocker, 08:43
- Re: Last Call: draft-hutzler-spamops (Email Submission: Access and Accountability) to BCP, Tony Finch, 07:56
- Re: Last Call: draft-hutzler-spamops (Email Submission: Access and Accountability) to BCP, John C Klensin, 03:02
June 19, 2007
- Re: Withdrawing sponsorship of draft-housley-tls-authz-extns, John C Klensin, 17:22
- Re: ABNF third-party rights as code (BCP78), Brian E Carpenter, 05:01
- Re: Last Call: draft-ietf-lemonade-rfc2192bis (IMAP URL Scheme) to Proposed Standard, Tony Finch, 02:20
- ABNF third-party rights as code (BCP78), Dave Cridland, 02:13
- Re: Last Call: draft-ietf-mip6-bootstrapping-split, Brian E Carpenter, 01:52
- Re: Reforming the BOF Process (was Declining the ifare bof for Chicago), Brian E Carpenter, 01:52
June 18, 2007
- Re: Reforming the BOF Process (was Declining the ifare bof for Chicago), John C Klensin, 22:21
- Re: Reforming the BOF Process (was Declining the ifare bof for Chicago), Clint Chaplin, 19:11
- Re: Should I* opinions be afforded a special status? (Re: [saag] Declining the ifare bof for Chicago), Cullen Jennings, 18:32
- Re: Last Call: draft-ietf-lemonade-rfc2192bis (IMAP URL Scheme) to Proposed Standard, Joel M. Halpern, 18:28
- Re: Last Call: draft-ietf-lemonade-rfc2192bis (IMAP URL Scheme) to Proposed Standard, Ted Hardie, 15:55
- Re: Last Call: draft-ietf-lemonade-rfc2192bis (IMAP URL Scheme) to Proposed Standard, Joel M. Halpern, 14:50
- Re: On Experts [Re: Should I* opinions be afforded a special status? (Re: [saag] Declining the ifare bof for Chicago)], Michael Thomas, 09:48
- Re: Reforming the BOF Process (was Declining the ifare bof for Chicago), Henning Schulzrinne, 08:44
- Re: Last Call: draft-ietf-lemonade-rfc2192bis (IMAP URL Scheme) to Proposed Standard, Paul Hoffman, 08:41
- Re: Last Call: draft-ietf-lemonade-rfc2192bis (IMAP URL Scheme) to Proposed Standard, Ted Hardie, 08:33
- RE: Reforming the BOF Process (was Declining the ifare bof for Chicago), Bernard Aboba, 07:43
- RE: Reforming the BOF Process (was Declining the ifare bof for Chicago), Bernard Aboba, 07:43
- RE: tsv-dir review of draft-ietf-xcon-bfcp-connection-04, Black_David, 07:38
- Re: tsv-dir review of draft-ietf-xcon-bfcp-connection-04, Gonzalo Camarillo, 07:38
- Re: Last Call: draft-ietf-lemonade-rfc2192bis (IMAP URL Scheme) to Proposed Standard, Dave Cridland, 06:42
- Re: Should I* opinions be afforded a special status? (Re: [saag] Declining the ifare bof for Chicago), Joel M. Halpern, 05:34
- Re: Last Call: draft-ietf-lemonade-rfc2192bis (IMAP URL Scheme) to Proposed Standard, Simon Josefsson, 05:24
- Re: Last Call: draft-ietf-lemonade-rfc2192bis (IMAP URL Scheme) to Proposed Standard, Dave Cridland, 04:58
- Re: Last Call: draft-ietf-lemonade-rfc2192bis (IMAP URL Scheme) to Proposed Standard, Simon Josefsson, 03:43
- Re: Last Call: draft-ietf-lemonade-rfc2192bis (IMAP URL Scheme) to Proposed Standard, Dave Cridland, 03:17
- Re: Role of IANA in approving assignments, Brian E Carpenter, 02:39
- On Experts [Re: Should I* opinions be afforded a special status? (Re: [saag] Declining the ifare bof for Chicago)], Brian E Carpenter, 02:29
- Re: Last Call: draft-ietf-lemonade-rfc2192bis (IMAP URL Scheme) to Proposed Standard, Simon Josefsson, 00:31
- Re: Reforming the BOF Process (was Declining the ifare bof for Chicago), Lakshminath Dondeti, 00:11
June 17, 2007
- RE: Reforming the BOF Process (was Declining the ifare bof for Chicago), Romascanu, Dan (Dan), 23:36
- Re: Should I* opinions be afforded a special status? (Re: [saag] Declining the ifare bof for Chicago), Lakshminath Dondeti, 22:44
- IANA considerations concerns -- specific cases?, Jari Arkko, 13:39
- Re: Reforming the BOF Process (was Declining the ifare bof for Chicago), John C Klensin, 11:13
- Re: [XCON] Re: tsv-dir review of draft-ietf-xcon-bfcp-connection-04, Eric Rescorla, 09:01
- RE: [XCON] Re: tsv-dir review of draft-ietf-xcon-bfcp-connection-04, Brian Rosen, 08:08
- Re: Role of IANA in approving assignments, Harald Alvestrand, 05:41
June 15, 2007
- draft-ietf-syslog-protocol-21.txt: section 3 contains new text to address ietf last call comments, Sam Hartman, 16:56
- Re: Type I vs. Type II errors, Keith Moore, 12:34
- Re: Type I vs. Type II errors, Keith Moore, 12:26
- Re: Should I* opinions be afforded a special status? (Re: [saag] Declining the ifare bof for Chicago), Michael Thomas, 09:00
- RE: IANA registration constraints (was: Re: Withdrawing sponsorship...), Paul Hoffman, 08:57
- Re: Role of IANA in approving assignments, Paul Hoffman, 08:57
- Re: Should I* opinions be afforded a special status? (Re: [saag] Declining the ifare bof for Chicago), Ted Hardie, 08:42
- Re: Role of IANA in approving assignments, Sam Hartman, 07:56
- RE: Withdrawing sponsorship of draft-housley-tls-authz-extns, Eastlake III Donald-LDE008, 07:36
- Re: Role of IANA in approving assignments, Robert Elz, 06:51
- Role of IANA in approving assignments, Thomas Narten, 06:31
- Re: Withdrawing sponsorship of draft-housley-tls-authz-extns, Thomas Narten, 06:16
- Re: Withdrawing sponsorship of draft-housley-tls-authz-extns, Robert Elz, 06:16
- Weekly posting summary for ietf(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org, Thomas Narten, 05:32
- Re: Withdrawing sponsorship of draft-housley-tls-authz-extns, Brian E Carpenter, 04:34
- Re: Reforming the BOF Process (was Declining the ifare bof for Chicago), Jari Arkko, 03:54
- RE: Reforming the BOF Process (was Declining the ifare bof for Chicago), Romascanu, Dan (Dan), 03:23
- RE: IANA registration constraints (was: Re: Withdrawing sponsorship...), Pasi.Eronen, 02:12
- RE: Withdrawing sponsorship of draft-housley-tls-authz-extns, Pasi.Eronen, 01:26
- Re: Type I vs. Type II errors, Stephane Bortzmeyer, 00:56
June 14, 2007
- Re: Should I* opinions be afforded a special status? (Re: [saag] Declining the ifare bof for Chicago), Harald Alvestrand, 23:58
- Away until June-18: [L2TPEXT Milestones past due], Carlos Pignataro, 23:31
- Re: Withdrawing sponsorship of draft-housley-tls-authz-extns, Thomas Narten, 17:09
- Re: Should I* opinions be afforded a special status? (Re: [saag] Declining the ifare bof for Chicago), Thomas Narten, 17:09
- Re: Questions on my role as the 2007-8 nomcom chair and the various discussions on the IETF list, Stephen Kent, 11:55
- Re: Last Call: draft-ietf-lemonade-rfc2192bis (IMAP URL Scheme) to Proposed Standard, Ted Hardie, 10:42
- RE: IANA registration constraints, Hallam-Baker, Phillip, 10:19
- RE: IANA registration constraints, Bob Braden, 10:06
- Re: Last Call: draft-ietf-lemonade-rfc2192bis (IMAP URL Scheme) to Proposed Standard, Simon Josefsson, 09:43
- RE: IANA registration constraints (was: Re: Withdrawingsponsorship...), michael.dillon, 09:01
- RE: IANA registration constraints (was: Re: Withdrawing sponsorship...), Hallam-Baker, Phillip, 08:50
- RE: IANA registration constraints (was: Re: Withdrawingsponsorship...), Hallam-Baker, Phillip, 08:37
- RE: IANA registration constraints, Hallam-Baker, Phillip, 08:27
- RE: IANA registration constraints (was: Re: Withdrawing sponsorship...), Paul Hoffman, 07:47
- Re: IANA registration constraints, Brian E Carpenter, 00:56
June 13, 2007
- RE: IANA registration constraints (was: Re: Withdrawing sponsorship...), Pasi.Eronen, 21:29
- Re: Should I* opinions be afforded a special status? (Re: [saag] Declining the ifare bof for Chicago), John C Klensin, 17:51
- Re: IANA registration constraints (was: Re: Withdrawing sponsorship...), Joel Jaeggli, 15:12
- Re: IANA registration constraints (was: Re: Withdrawing sponsorship...), John C Klensin, 14:32
- Re: IANA registration constraints (was: Re: Withdrawing sponsorship...), Tony Finch, 13:57
- Re: Withdrawing sponsorship of draft-housley-tls-authz-extns, Harald Tveit Alvestrand, 13:56
- RE: IANA registration constraints (was: Re: Withdrawing sponsorship...), Hallam-Baker, Phillip, 13:04
- Re: IANA registration constraints (was: Re: Withdrawing sponsorship...), Arnt Gulbrandsen, 12:35
- Re: IANA registration constraints (was: Re: Withdrawing sponsorship...), Bob Braden, 12:00
- Re: chicago IETF IPv6 connectivity, Jeroen Massar, 10:59
- Re: Un-expiring procedural documents, Brian E Carpenter, 10:46
- Reforming the BOF Process (was Declining the ifare bof for Chicago), Bernard Aboba, 10:35
- chicago IETF IPv6 connectivity, Jun-ichiro itojun Hagino, 10:35
- Re: tsv-dir review of draft-ietf-mip4-fmipv4-07.txt, Rajeev Koodli, 10:14
- Re: tsv-dir review of draft-ietf-mip4-fmipv4-07.txt, Rajeev Koodli, 10:14
- NDN: [IPFIX] Last Call: draft-ietf-ipfix-biflow (Bidirectional Flow Export using, Post . Office, 10:14
- Re: Last Call: draft-chakrabarti-ipv6-addrselect-api (IPv6 Socket API for Address Selection) to Informational RFC, Samita Chakrabarti, 10:14
- RE: Last Call: draft-ietf-opsec-filter-caps (Filtering and Rate Limiting Capabilities for IP Network Infrastructure) to BCP, Chris L. Morrow, 10:14
- RE: Last Call: draft-ietf-opsec-filter-caps (Filtering and Rate Limiting Capabilities for IP Network Infrastructure) to BCP, Barry Greene \(bgreene\), 10:14
- Re: IANA registration constraints (was: Re: Withdrawing sponsorship...), John C Klensin, 09:20
- RE: IANA registration constraints, Hallam-Baker, Phillip, 08:41
- Re: IANA registration constraints (was: Re: Withdrawing sponsorship...), Paul Hoffman, 08:29
- RE: IANA registration constraints, Paul Hoffman, 08:29
- Re: IANA registration constraints, Ralph Droms, 08:22
- Un-expiring procedural documents, Paul Hoffman, 08:19
- RE: IANA registration constraints, Hallam-Baker, Phillip, 07:55
- Re: IANA registration constraints, Jari Arkko, 07:38
- Re: IANA considerations and IETF Consensus, Jari Arkko, 07:27
- RE: Should I* opinions be afforded a special status? (Re: [saag] Declining the ifare bof for Chicago), Hallam-Baker, Phillip, 05:55
- RE: IANA registration constraints, Hallam-Baker, Phillip, 05:53
- Re: Should I* opinions be afforded a special status? (Re: [saag] Declining the ifare bof for Chicago), Jari Arkko, 04:11
- Re: Should I* opinions be afforded a special status? (Re: [saag] Declining the ifare bof for Chicago), Jari Arkko, 04:00
- Re: IANA registration constraints (was: Re: Withdrawing sponsorship...), Pasi.Eronen, 02:09
- Re: Questions on my role as the 2007-8 nomcom chair and the various discussions on the IETF list, Eliot Lear, 00:41
- Questions on my role as the 2007-8 nomcom chair and the various discussions on the IETF list, Lakshminath Dondeti, 00:30
June 12, 2007
- Re: Should I* opinions be afforded a special status? (Re: [saag] Declining the ifare bof for Chicago), Lakshminath Dondeti, 22:57
- Re: Should I* opinions be afforded a special status? (Re: [saag] Declining the ifare bof for Chicago), Lakshminath Dondeti, 22:40
- Re: Should I* opinions be afforded a special status? (Re: [saag] Declining the ifare bof for Chicago), Brian E Carpenter, 22:17
- Re: Should I* opinions be afforded a special status? (Re: [saag] Declining the ifare bof for Chicago), Joel M. Halpern, 18:26
- Re: Should I* opinions be afforded a special status? (Re: [saag] Declining the ifare bof for Chicago), Ted Hardie, 14:23
- Re: Should I* opinions be afforded a special status?, Lakshminath Dondeti, 13:56
- Re: Withdrawing sponsorship of draft-housley-tls-authz-extns, Russ Housley, 13:52
- Re: Should I* opinions be afforded a special status? (Re: [saag] Declining the ifare bof for Chicago), Sam Hartman, 13:29
- Re: Should I* opinions be afforded a special status? (Re: [saag] Declining the ifare bof for Chicago), Melinda Shore, 13:12
- Should I* opinions be afforded a special status? (Re: [saag] Declining the ifare bof for Chicago), Lakshminath Dondeti, 12:18
- Re: IANA considerations and IETF Consensus, Paul Hoffman, 10:54
- Re: Withdrawing sponsorship of draft-housley-tls-authz-extns, Sam Hartman, 10:31
- Type I vs. Type II errors, Dave Crocker, 09:55
- Re: Withdrawing sponsorship of draft-housley-tls-authz-extns, Thomas Narten, 09:27
- Re: Withdrawing sponsorship of draft-housley-tls-authz-extns, John C Klensin, 08:52
- Re: IANA registration constraints, Dave Crocker, 08:51
- Re: IANA registration constraints (was: Re: Withdrawing sponsorship...), John C Klensin, 08:44
- IANA considerations and IETF Consensus, Paul Hoffman, 08:42
- IANA registration constraints (was: Re: Withdrawing sponsorship...), Dave Crocker, 08:27
- Re: Withdrawing sponsorship of draft-housley-tls-authz-extns, Brian E Carpenter, 08:23
- Re: Withdrawing sponsorship of draft-housley-tls-authz-extns, John C Klensin, 08:12
- Re: Withdrawing sponsorship of draft-housley-tls-authz-extns, Dave Crocker, 07:40
- Re: Withdrawing sponsorship of draft-housley-tls-authz-extns, Tony Finch, 07:34
- Re: Withdrawing sponsorship of draft-housley-tls-authz-extns, Dave Crocker, 07:13
- Re: Withdrawing sponsorship of draft-housley-tls-authz-extns, Eliot Lear, 05:47
- RE: Withdrawing sponsorship of draft-housley-tls-authz-extns, Pasi.Eronen, 04:19
- Re: [Mip4] AW: [tsv-dir] Re: tsv-dir review of draft-ietf-mip4-fmipv4-07.txt, Jari Arkko, 03:45
- AW: [tsv-dir] Re: tsv-dir review of draft-ietf-mip4-fmipv4-07.txt, Tschofenig, Hannes, 02:55
June 10, 2007
- Re: Last Call: draft-hutzler-spamops (Email Submission: Access and Accountability) to BCP, Tony Finch, 18:27
- Re: Last Call: draft-hutzler-spamops (Email Submission: Access and Accountability) to BCP, Ned Freed, 14:13
- Re: Last Call: draft-hutzler-spamops (Email Submission: Access and Accountability) to BCP, Tony Finch, 14:00
- Re: Last Call: draft-hutzler-spamops (Email Submission: Access and Accountability) to BCP, william(at)elan.net, 11:51
- Re: Last Call: draft-hutzler-spamops (Email Submission: Access and Accountability) to BCP, Tony Finch, 11:33
- Re: Last Call: draft-hutzler-spamops (Email Submission: Access and Accountability) to BCP, John C Klensin, 09:34
- Re: Last Call: draft-hutzler-spamops (Email Submission: Access and Accountability) to BCP, Dave Crocker, 07:35
- Re: Last Call: draft-hutzler-spamops (Email Submission: Access and Accountability) to BCP, Dave Crocker, 07:15
June 01, 2007
- Re: consensus and anonymity, Michael Thomas, 17:00
- Re: consensus and anonymity, Michael Thomas, 11:00
- Re: consensus and anonymity, Lakshminath Dondeti, 10:02
- Re: consensus and anonymity, Michael Thomas, 09:49
- SeND & CGA Extensions BOF, marcelo bagnulo braun, 08:43
- Re: consensus and anonymity, Andy Bierman, 05:22
- Weekly posting summary for ietf(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org, Thomas Narten, 05:13
- Re: consensus and anonymity, Spencer Dawkins, 04:05
- Re: consensus and anonymity, Brian E Carpenter, 03:25