IETF Discussion (date)
July 31, 2007
- Re: on the value of "running code" (was Re: Do you want to have more meetings outside US ?), Jun-ichiro itojun Hagino, 21:56
- Re: DHCP failures (was RE: Do you want to have more meetings outside US ?), John C Klensin, 18:32
- Re: Funding (was Re: Charging I-Ds), Jun-ichiro itojun Hagino, 17:33
- RE: Charging I-Ds, Peter Sherbin, 17:17
- Re: DHCP failures (was RE: Do you want to have more meetings outside US ?), Bob Hinden, 16:42
- Re: DHCP failures (was RE: Do you want to have more meetings outside US ?), Iljitsch van Beijnum, 16:16
- Re: DHCP failures (was RE: Do you want to have more meetings outside US ?), John C Klensin, 16:01
- Re: DHCP failures (was RE: Do you want to have more meetings outside US ?), Marc Manthey, 15:55
- DHCP failures (was RE: Do you want to have more meetings outside US ?), Tony Hain, 15:42
- RE: Charging I-Ds, Hallam-Baker, Phillip, 15:31
- on the value of "running code" (was Re: Do you want to have more meetings outside US ?), Keith Moore, 14:26
- Re: IETF Secretariat Services RFP Bidders, Ray Pelletier, 13:57
- Re: Do you want to have more meetings outside US ?, Peter Saint-Andre, 13:40
- Re: Do you want to have more meetings outside US ?, Alexey Melnikov, 13:37
- Re: Do you want to have more meetings outside US ?, Alexey Melnikov, 13:30
- Re: IETF Secretariat Services RFP Bidders, Pete Resnick, 13:30
- Re: Charging I-Ds, Keith Moore, 12:19
- Funding (was Re: Charging I-Ds), Suresh Krishnan, 12:07
- RE: On firewall traversal vs. bypass, Dan Wing, 11:48
- Re: [OT] Internet / DNS Timeline (The History of the Internet DNS), Ofer Inbar, 11:05
- Re: Charging I-Ds, Peter Saint-Andre, 10:56
- Re: Charging I-Ds, Tim Chown, 10:56
- Re: Charging I-Ds, Adrian Farrel, 10:45
- RE: Charging I-Ds, Eric Gray (LO/EUS), 10:43
- Re: Charging I-Ds, Melinda Shore, 10:06
- Re: IPv6: Do you want to have more meetings outside US ?, JORDI PALET MARTINEZ, 10:06
- Re: Charging I-Ds, Peter Saint-Andre, 10:00
- Re: Charging I-Ds, Thierry Ernst, 09:56
- Re: Charging I-Ds, Ned Freed, 09:52
- RE: Charging I-Ds, Hallam-Baker, Phillip, 09:31
- Re: Charging I-Ds, Keith Moore, 09:30
- RE: Do you want to have more meetings outside US ?, Hallam-Baker, Phillip, 09:27
- Re: IPv6: Do you want to have more meetings outside US ?, Joe Abley, 09:25
- Re: Charging I-Ds, Thierry Ernst, 09:20
- Re: IPv6: Do you want to have more meetings outside US ?, Joe Abley, 09:20
- Re: Charging I-Ds, Marshall Eubanks, 08:40
- Re: Charging I-Ds, Keith Moore, 08:40
- Re: Charging I-Ds, Keith Moore, 08:30
- Re: Charging I-Ds, Tim Chown, 08:27
- Re: Do you want to have more meetings outside US ?, Simon Josefsson, 08:24
- Re: Charging I-Ds, Melinda Shore, 08:02
- Re: Charging I-Ds, Stephane Bortzmeyer, 07:53
- IETF Secretariat Services RFP Bidders, IETF Administrative Director, 07:34
- Re: Do you want to have more meetings outside US ?, John C Klensin, 06:54
- Re: Charging I-Ds, Julian Reschke, 06:49
- Charging I-Ds, Thierry Ernst, 06:23
- Re: On firewall traversal vs. bypass, Melinda Shore, 05:13
- Re: Do you want to have more meetings outside US ?, Arnt Gulbrandsen, 02:13
- Re: Do you want to have more meetings outside US ?, Adrian Farrel, 01:45
- Re: about RSVP : Admin hello disable., Adrian Farrel, 01:45
- On firewall traversal vs. bypass, Aki Niemi, 01:11
- Re: Do you want to have more meetings outside US ?, Julian Reschke, 00:52
July 30, 2007
- Re: Do you want to have more meetings outside US ?, Jeffrey Altman, 22:22
- about RSVP : Admin hello disable., shivakumar, 19:15
- Re: Do you want to have more meetings outside US ?, Andy Bierman, 16:22
- Re: Do you want to have more meetings outside US ?, Ken Raeburn, 15:07
- Re: Do you want to have more meetings outside US ?, Brian E Carpenter, 14:43
- Re: Do you want to have more meetings outside US ?, Michael Thomas, 13:27
- Re: Do you want to have more meetings outside US ?, Edward Lewis, 13:19
- Re: Do you want to have more meetings outside US ?, Peter Saint-Andre, 13:10
- Re: Do you want to have more meetings outside US ?, Matt Pounsett, 12:53
- Re: Do you want to have more meetings outside US ?, Lyndon Nerenberg, 12:38
- Re: Do you want to have more meetings outside US ?, Fred Baker, 12:38
- Re: Do you want to have more meetings outside US ?, Andy Bierman, 12:26
- Re: Do you want to have more meetings outside US ?, John C Klensin, 08:35
- Re: Do you want to have more meetings outside US ?, Carsten Bormann, 08:18
- Re: Do you want to have more meetings outside US ?, John C Klensin, 07:46
- Re: Do you want to have more meetings outside US ?, Bill Manning, 07:45
- Re: Do you want to have more meetings outside US ?, Bill Manning, 07:34
- Re: IPv6: Do you want to have more meetings outside US ?, Brian E Carpenter, 07:25
- Re: Do you want to have more meetings outside US ?, Spencer Dawkins, 05:09
July 29, 2007
- Re: IPv6: Do you want to have more meetings outside US ?, Tony Li, 22:07
- Re: Do you want to have more meetings outside US ?, Doug Ewell, 21:22
- Re: IPv6: Do you want to have more meetings outside US ?, Jun-ichiro itojun Hagino, 20:55
- Re: Do you want to have more meetings outside US ?, John C Klensin, 19:12
- Re: Do you want to have more meetings outside US ?, Joel Jaeggli, 16:02
- Re: Do you want to have more meetings outside US ?, Ole Jacobsen, 14:24
- Re: Do you want to have more meetings outside US ?, JORDI PALET MARTINEZ, 13:52
- Re: Do you want to have more meetings outside US ?, Adrian Farrel, 13:24
- Re: Do you want to have more meetings outside US ?, JORDI PALET MARTINEZ, 11:40
- Re: IPv6: Do you want to have more meetings outside US ?, Marc Manthey, 11:40
- Re: Do you want to have more meetings outside US ?, JORDI PALET MARTINEZ, 11:32
- Re: Do you want to have more meetings outside US ?, Arnt Gulbrandsen, 08:53
- IPv6: Do you want to have more meetings outside US ?, Peter Dambier, 08:39
- Re: Do you want to have more meetings outside US ?, John C Klensin, 08:39
- Re: Do you want to have more meetings outside US ?, Stewart Bryant, 08:05
- Re: Do you want to have more meetings outside US ?, Harald Alvestrand, 00:43
July 26, 2007
- Weekly posting summary for ietf(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org, Thomas Narten, 21:54
- Re: e2e, Steven M. Bellovin, 21:38
- Re: RFC Announcement Format, Philip Matthews, 21:25
- Re: e2e, Joel Jaeggli, 20:57
- RE: e2e, Hallam-Baker, Phillip, 20:50
- Re: e2e, Noel Chiappa, 20:16
- Re: e2e, Lixia Zhang, 18:02
- Re: e2e, Scott Brim, 16:39
- e2e, John Kristoff, 16:22
- RE: [secdir] SecDir review of draft-ietf-sipping-v6-transition-05, Tobias Gondrom, 10:29
- Gen-ART review of draft-ietf-avt-rtp-and-rtcp-mux-05.txt, Black_David, 10:29
- Transport Directorate review of draft-ietf-ipfix-implementation-guidelines-06.txt, Black_David, 10:29
- RE: Gen-ART review of draft-ietf-avt-rtp-and-rtcp-mux-05.txt, Black_David, 10:29
- RE: [secdir] SecDir review of draft-ietf-sipping-v6-transition-05, Tobias Gondrom, 10:29
- Re: [secdir] SecDir review of draft-ietf-sipping-v6-transition-05, Vijay K. Gurbani, 10:29
- Re: ICE deployment data before LC for RFC, Henry Sinnreich, 10:29
- RE: Gen-ART review of draft-ietf-avt-rtp-and-rtcp-mux-05.txt, Black_David, 10:29
- Re: [secdir] SecDir review of draft-ietf-sipping-v6-transition-05, Vijay K. Gurbani, 10:29
July 25, 2007
- IETF 69 ical Agent Generator bug?, Yangwoo Ko, 18:36
- RFC Announcement Format, Bill McQuillan, 09:36
- Re: Last Call comment: draft-rosenberg-sip-app-media-tag-01.txt, Dave Crocker, 08:15
- Re: Last Call comment: draft-rosenberg-sip-app-media-tag-01.txt, Ted Hardie, 08:01
- Re: Last Call comment: draft-rosenberg-sip-app-media-tag-01.txt, Dave Crocker, 07:51
July 24, 2007
- Last Call comment: draft-rosenberg-sip-app-media-tag-01.txt, Ted Hardie, 16:35
- Re: Requirements for Open IESG Positions, Soininen Jonne (NSN FI/Espoo), 15:36
- RE: Requirements for Open IESG Positions, Narayanan, Vidya, 15:12
- Re: Requirements for Open IESG Positions, Jari Arkko, 14:55
- Re: Requirements for Open IESG Positions, Sam Hartman, 14:35
- Re: IETF Streaming, Scott O. Bradner, 14:33
- Re: Requirements for Open IESG Positions, Jari Arkko, 14:32
- Re: IETF Streaming, Henrik Levkowetz, 14:31
- Re: IETF Streaming, Jeffrey Altman, 14:22
- RE: Requirements for Open IESG Positions, Russ Housley, 14:08
- IAOC office hours, Kurt Erik Lindqvist, 13:47
- RE: Requirements for Open IESG Positions, Narayanan, Vidya, 12:45
- Re: IETF Streaming, Marc Manthey, 11:34
- Re: IETF Streaming, Jeffrey Altman, 11:24
- Re: Requirements for Open IESG Positions, Russ Housley, 10:44
- Re: Requirements for Open IESG Positions, Sam Hartman, 09:03
July 23, 2007
- Re: Requirements for Open IESG Positions, Soininen Jonne (NSN FI/Espoo), 21:00
- Re: Requirements for Open IESG Positions, Brian E Carpenter, 16:29
- Re: Requirements for Open IESG Positions, Soininen Jonne (NSN FI/Espoo), 16:12
- Re: WG Action: RECHARTER: Kerberos (krb-wg), Sam Hartman, 14:21
- Re: Updating the rules?, Sam Hartman, 09:03
- HP nc4010 power supply??, Robert (IETF) Moskowitz, 03:19
July 19, 2007
- "Self-Address Fixing Evolution (SAFE) -- STUN Controlled Middlebox Traversal" Bar-BoF - SUNDAY, July 22, 2007 8pm, Hannes Tschofenig, 22:48
- Weekly posting summary for ietf(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org, Thomas Narten, 21:54
- Re: Audio Streaming - IETF69 Chicago Illinois USA July 22nd-27th, Joel Jaeggli, 19:30
- Re: Audio Streaming - IETF69 Chicago Illinois USA July 22nd-27th, Lucy Lynch, 10:35
- Re: Audio Streaming - IETF69 Chicago Illinois USA July 22nd-27th, Philip Matthews, 10:27
- Re: [OT] Internet / DNS Timeline (The History of the Internet DNS), Joe Baptista, 08:59
- Re: [OT] Internet / DNS Timeline (The History of the Internet DNS), Roy Arends, 08:15
- [OT] Internet / DNS Timeline (The History of the Internet DNS), Joe Baptista, 07:11
July 17, 2007
- RE: Peers, servers and consumers (was RE: The myth of NAT traversal, was: Re: IPv4 to IPv6 transition), Hallam-Baker, Phillip, 23:12
- Peers, servers and consumers (was RE: The myth of NAT traversal, was: Re: IPv4 to IPv6 transition), Ted Hardie, 21:34
- RE: The myth of NAT traversal, was: Re: IPv4 to IPv6 transition, Hallam-Baker, Phillip, 19:48
- Re: Gen-ART review of draft-ietf-avt-rtp-and-rtcp-mux-05.txt, Colin Perkins, 15:14
- Authority-to-Individuals Emergency Services Bar-BOF: Update, Hannes Tschofenig, 13:19
- Re: Gen-ART review of draft-ietf-avt-rtp-and-rtcp-mux-05.txt, Colin Perkins, 09:01
- Re: Gen-ART review of draft-ietf-avt-rtp-and-rtcp-mux-05.txt, Colin Perkins, 07:28
- Re: chicago IETF IPv6 connectivity, Jun-ichiro itojun Hagino, 05:57
- Re: chicago IETF IPv6 connectivity, Brian E Carpenter, 05:40
- Re: chicago IETF IPv6 connectivity, Keith Moore, 05:05
- Re: chicago IETF IPv6 connectivity, Brian E Carpenter, 02:54
- RE: chicago IETF IPv6 connectivity, michael.dillon, 02:03
July 16, 2007
- Re: chicago IETF IPv6 connectivity, Keith Moore, 23:38
- Re: chicago IETF IPv6 connectivity, Jun-ichiro itojun Hagino, 21:38
- Re: chicago IETF IPv6 connectivity, Keith Moore, 20:49
- Re: secdir review of draft-ietf-dkim-ssp-requirements-04, Douglas Otis, 19:55
- Re: chicago IETF IPv6 connectivity, Jun-ichiro itojun Hagino, 19:50
- [OT] DNS test of validity of a claim ROOT fracture, Joe Baptista, 19:24
- Re: The myth of NAT traversal, was: Re: IPv4 to IPv6 transition, Douglas Otis, 16:03
- Re: chicago IETF IPv6 connectivity, Keith Moore, 14:48
- secdir review of draft-ietf-dkim-ssp-requirements-04, David Harrington, 14:28
- Re: take the train in Chicago, Dave Crocker, 09:21
- Re: The myth of NAT traversal, was: Re: IPv4 to IPv6 transition, Ted Hardie, 09:02
- Re: take the train in Chicago, sml, 08:27
- Re: The myth of NAT traversal, was: Re: IPv4 to IPv6 transition, Melinda Shore, 08:05
- Re: The myth of NAT traversal, was: Re: IPv4 to IPv6 transition, Joel Jaeggli, 07:44
- Re: take the train in Chicago, Janet P Gunn, 07:21
- Re: take the train in Chicago, Brian E Carpenter, 07:20
- Re: take the train in Chicago, Tim Chown, 07:01
- Re: The myth of NAT traversal, was: Re: IPv4 to IPv6 transition, Dave Cridland, 06:50
- Re: [Sip] Last Call: draft-ietf-sip-answermode (Requesting Answering Modes for the Session Initiation Protocol (SIP)) to Proposed Standard, Dean Willis, 06:22
- Re: The myth of NAT traversal, was: Re: IPv4 to IPv6 transition, Melinda Shore, 04:56
- Re: The myth of NAT traversal, was: Re: IPv4 to IPv6 transition, Melinda Shore, 04:52
- Re: The myth of NAT traversal, was: Re: IPv4 to IPv6 transition, Hannes Tschofenig, 04:28
- Re: The myth of NAT traversal, was: Re: IPv4 to IPv6 transition, Hallam-Baker, Phillip, 03:31
- RE: chicago IETF IPv6 connectivity, michael.dillon, 02:58
- Re: The myth of NAT traversal, was: Re: IPv4 to IPv6 transition, Hannes Tschofenig, 01:30
- Re: The myth of NAT traversal, was: Re: IPv4 to IPv6 transition, Brian E Carpenter, 01:14
July 15, 2007
- IPv6 demystified, Jun-ichiro itojun Hagino, 22:04
- Audio Streaming - IETF69 Chicago Illinois USA July 22nd-27th, Joel Jaeggli, 16:14
- Re: take the train in Chicago, Marshall Eubanks, 09:32
- Re: take the train in Chicago, John Levine, 08:56
- take the train in Chicago, Andy Bierman, 00:27
July 14, 2007
- Re: IPv4 to IPv6 transition, Douglas Otis, 14:48
- Re: chicago IETF IPv6 connectivity, Joel Jaeggli, 13:17
- Re: chicago IETF IPv6 connectivity, Noel Chiappa, 12:38
- Re: Audio streaming at IETF 69, Joel Jaeggli, 10:44
- Re: chicago IETF IPv6 connectivity, Stephen Sprunk, 09:37
- Re: Updating the rules?, Russ Housley, 08:29
- Re: Updating the rules?, Russ Housley, 08:29
- Re: The myth of NAT traversal, was: Re: IPv4 to IPv6 transition, Hannes Tschofenig, 08:06
- Audio streaming at IETF 69, Julian Reschke, 03:38
July 13, 2007
- Re: IPv4 to IPv6 transition, JORDI PALET MARTINEZ, 23:52
- Re: chicago IETF IPv6 connectivity, Jun-ichiro itojun Hagino, 17:29
- RE: IPv4 to IPv6 transition, Tony Hain, 17:27
- Re: Updating the rules?, Hallam-Baker, Phillip, 17:26
- Re: Autoreply, Douglas Otis, 15:22
- Re: The myth of NAT traversal, was: Re: IPv4 to IPv6 transition, Melinda Shore, 15:09
- RE: The myth of NAT traversal, was: Re: IPv4 to IPv6 transition, michael.dillon, 14:43
- Re: Updating the rules?, Keith Moore, 14:24
- Re: The myth of NAT traversal, was: Re: IPv4 to IPv6 transition, Keith Moore, 14:15
- The myth of NAT traversal, was: Re: IPv4 to IPv6 transition, Iljitsch van Beijnum, 13:51
- Re: IPv4 to IPv6 transition, Keith Moore, 13:22
- Re: IPv4 to IPv6 transition, Hannes Tschofenig, 13:11
- Re: IPv4 to IPv6 transition, Hannes Tschofenig, 13:10
- Re: IPv4 to IPv6 transition, Keith Moore, 13:01
- Re: chicago IETF IPv6 connectivity, Keith Moore, 13:00
- RE: IPv4 to IPv6 transition, Hallam-Baker, Phillip, 12:50
- Re: Updating the rules?, Julian Reschke, 12:48
- Re: chicago IETF IPv6 connectivity, Keith Moore, 12:46
- Re: chicago IETF IPv6 connectivity, Keith Moore, 12:45
- Re: IPv4 to IPv6 transition, Keith Moore, 12:27
- Re: Updating the rules?, Russ Housley, 12:15
- RE: Updating the rules?, Hallam-Baker, Phillip, 12:14
- Re: chicago IETF IPv6 connectivity, Stephen Sprunk, 12:06
- Re: Updating the rules?, Julian Reschke, 11:34
- Re: Updating the rules?, Russ Housley, 11:21
- Re: IPv4 to IPv6 transition, shogunx, 11:11
- RE: chicago IETF IPv6 connectivity, Hallam-Baker, Phillip, 11:08
- IPv4 to IPv6 transition, Hallam-Baker, Phillip, 10:59
- Re: chicago IETF IPv6 connectivity, Jun-ichiro itojun Hagino, 10:48
- Re: chicago IETF IPv6 connectivity, Keith Moore, 10:40
- Re: chicago IETF IPv6 connectivity, Iljitsch van Beijnum, 10:27
- Re: chicago IETF IPv6 connectivity, Jun-ichiro itojun Hagino, 10:25
- Re: chicago IETF IPv6 connectivity, Keith Moore, 10:19
- Re: chicago IETF IPv6 connectivity, Keith Moore, 10:10
- Re: chicago IETF IPv6 connectivity, Jun-ichiro itojun Hagino, 10:10
- Re: Autoreply, Ken Raeburn, 09:56
- Re: chicago IETF IPv6 connectivity, Stephen Sprunk, 09:45
- Re: Autoreply, Keith Moore, 06:48
- Re: Autoreply, Iljitsch van Beijnum, 06:38
- Re: Autoreply, Keith Moore, 06:19
- Re: Autoreply, John C Klensin, 06:08
- Weekly posting summary for ietf(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org, Thomas Narten, 03:41
- Re: Autoreply, Ken Raeburn, 03:37
- Re: Autoreply, Iljitsch van Beijnum, 02:11
July 12, 2007
- Re: Autoreply, Ken Raeburn, 23:03
- Re: Autoreply, Douglas Otis, 19:06
- Working Group Last Call: syslog-sign-22, David Harrington, 11:04
- Re: Autoreply: Last Call: draft-duerst-archived-at (The Archived-At Message Header Field) to Proposed Standard, Ken Raeburn, 09:05
- Re: Autoreply: Last Call: draft-duerst-archived-at (The Archived-At Message Header Field) to Proposed Standard, Iljitsch van Beijnum, 08:51
- Re: Autoreply: Last Call: draft-duerst-archived-at (The Archived-At Message Header Field) to Proposed Standard, JORDI PALET MARTINEZ, 07:59
July 11, 2007
- RE: PKI is weakly secure (was Re: Updating the rules?), Hallam-Baker, Phillip, 17:21
- Re: Annoying auto-reply messages, Ned Freed, 11:47
- Re: Annoying auto-reply messages, Suresh Krishnan, 11:11
- Re: Annoying auto-reply messages, John C Klensin, 11:05
- IAOC Scribes, Kurt Erik Lindqvist, 09:09
- [Sip] Last Call: draft-ietf-sip-answermode (Requesting AnsweringModes for the Session Initiation Protocol (SIP)) to Proposed Standard, Steve Langstaff, 07:08
- Re: Annoying auto-reply messages, Eric Burger, 07:02
- Re: Last Call: draft-carlberg-trip-attribute-rp (TRIP Attribute for Resource Priority) to Proposed Standard, ken carlberg, 03:57
- Re: Annoying auto-reply messages, John C Klensin, 03:41
- Re: PKI is weakly secure (was Re: Updating the rules?), Masataka Ohta, 02:06
- Re: PKI is weakly secure (was Re: Updating the rules?), Eliot Lear, 00:56
July 10, 2007
- Re: PKI is weakly secure, Masataka Ohta, 18:24
- Re: PKI is weakly secure (was Re: Updating the rules?), Douglas Otis, 16:43
- Re: PKI is weakly secure (was Re: Updating the rules?), Stephen Kent, 13:54
- Re: PKI is weakly secure (was Re: Updating the rules?), Douglas Otis, 13:15
- RE: Updating the rules?, Hallam-Baker, Phillip, 12:57
- RE: Application knowledge of transport characteristics (was: Re:Domain Centric Administration), Hallam-Baker, Phillip, 12:36
- Re: Annoying auto-reply messages, Iljitsch van Beijnum, 12:25
- Re: Annoying auto-reply messages, Arnt Gulbrandsen, 12:16
- Re: Last Call: draft-carlberg-trip-attribute-rp (TRIP Attribute for Resource Priority) to Proposed Standard, Ted Hardie, 11:58
- RE: PKI is weakly secure, Hallam-Baker, Phillip, 11:51
- Annoying auto-reply messages, Ole Jacobsen, 10:52
- Re: PKI is weakly secure, Peter Saint-Andre, 08:24
- Re: PKI is weakly secure, Stephen Kent, 08:17
July 09, 2007
- Re: Updating the rules?, Robert Sayre, 20:04
- Re: PKI is weakly secure, Masataka Ohta, 18:57
- Re: Updating the rules?, Peter Saint-Andre, 11:17
- Re: PKI is weakly secure (was Re: Updating the rules?), Stephen Kent, 08:32
- Re: Application knowledge of transport characteristics (was: Re: Domain Centric Administration), Douglas Otis, 08:16
- Re: PKI is weakly secure (was Re: Updating the rules?), Jun-ichiro itojun Hagino, 07:31
- Re: Application knowledge of transport characteristics (was: Re: Domain Centric Administration), Stephane Bortzmeyer, 03:49
- Re: Application knowledge of transport characteristics (was: Re: Domain Centric Administration), Michael Tuexen, 01:08
- Re: Application knowledge of transport characteristics (was: Re: Domain Centric Administration), Douglas Otis, 00:48
July 08, 2007
- Re: Application knowledge of transport characteristics (was: Re: Domain Centric Administration), Lars Eggert, 22:54
- Re: PKI is weakly secure (was Re: Updating the rules?), Eliot Lear, 22:36
- Re: PKI is weakly secure (was Re: Updating the rules?), Masataka Ohta, 17:07
- Re: PKI is weakly secure, Sam Hartman, 17:01
- Re: Updating the rules?, Sam Hartman, 17:00
- IETF Secretariat Services RFP Qs & As, Ray Pelletier, 15:37
July 07, 2007
- Re: A new transition plan, was: Re: the evilness of NAT-PT, was: chicago IETF IPv6 connectivity, Stephen Sprunk, 19:08
- Re: A new transition plan, was: Re: the evilness of NAT-PT, was: chicago IETF IPv6 connectivity, Mark Andrews, 17:17
- Re: A new transition plan, was: Re: the evilness of NAT-PT, was: chicago IETF IPv6 connectivity, Douglas Otis, 16:08
- Re: A new transition plan, was: Re: the evilness of NAT-PT, was: chicago IETF IPv6 connectivity, Iljitsch van Beijnum, 11:22
- Re: Updating the rules?, Michael Thomas, 06:40
- Re: PKI is weakly secure (was Re: Updating the rules?), Keith Moore, 04:22
- Re: PKI is weakly secure (was Re: Updating the rules?), Masataka Ohta, 04:00
- Re: PKI is weakly secure (was Re: Updating the rules?), Eliot Lear, 03:20
- PKI is weakly secure (was Re: Updating the rules?), Masataka Ohta, 02:39
July 06, 2007
- Re: Updating the rules?, Brian E Carpenter, 23:55
- Re: A new transition plan, was: Re: the evilness of NAT-PT, was: chicago IETF IPv6 connectivity, Jun-ichiro itojun Hagino, 23:55
- Re: Updating the rules?, Keith Moore, 23:32
- Re: Last Call: draft-wilde-text-fragment (URI Fragment Identifiers for the text/plain Media Type) to Proposed Standard, Martin Duerst, 23:12
- Re: Updating the rules?, Robert Sayre, 21:20
- Re: A new transition plan, was: Re: the evilness of NAT-PT, was: chicago IETF IPv6 connectivity, Jun-ichiro itojun Hagino, 17:46
- Re: A new transition plan, was: Re: the evilness of NAT-PT, was: chicago IETF IPv6 connectivity, Douglas Otis, 17:08
- Re: A new transition plan, was: Re: the evilness of NAT-PT, was: chicago IETF IPv6 connectivity, Dave Crocker, 16:43
- Re: A new transition plan, was: Re: the evilness of NAT-PT, was: chicago IETF IPv6 connectivity, Keith Moore, 16:18
- Re: draft-williams-on-channel-binding: IANA rules too complicated, Nicolas Williams, 14:01
- Re: A new transition plan, was: Re: the evilness of NAT-PT, was: chicago IETF IPv6 connectivity, John C Klensin, 13:53
- Re: A new transition plan, was: Re: the evilness of NAT-PT, was: chicago IETF IPv6 connectivity, Douglas Otis, 11:54
- Re: A new transition plan, was: Re: the evilness of NAT-PT, was: chicago IETF IPv6 connectivity, Keith Moore, 08:36
- Re: draft-williams-on-channel-binding: IANA rules too complicated, Kurt Zeilenga, 07:20
- A new transition plan, was: Re: the evilness of NAT-PT, was: chicago IETF IPv6 connectivity, Iljitsch van Beijnum, 06:33
- Re: the evilness of NAT-PT, was: chicago IETF IPv6 connectivity, Terry Gray, 06:12
- Re: draft-williams-on-channel-binding: IANA rules too complicated, Jeffrey Altman, 05:15
- Re: draft-williams-on-channel-binding: IANA rules too complicated, Sam Hartman, 05:06
- Re: draft-williams-on-channel-binding: IANA rules too complicated, Simon Josefsson, 04:26
- Re: draft-williams-on-channel-binding: IANA rules too complicated, Jeffrey Altman, 04:03
- Draft ION about our rules in practice, Brian E Carpenter, 00:19
July 05, 2007
- Re: the evilness of NAT-PT, was: chicago IETF IPv6 connectivity, Keith Moore, 15:55
- Re: draft-williams-on-channel-binding: IANA rules too complicated, Alexey Melnikov, 12:36
- Re: the evilness of NAT-PT, was: chicago IETF IPv6 connectivity, john . loughney, 12:18
- Re: the evilness of NAT-PT, was: chicago IETF IPv6 connectivity, Keith Moore, 11:58
- RE: Putting technology on the table [Re: Domain Centric Administration, RE: draft-ietf-v6ops-natpt-to-historic-00.txt], Hallam-Baker, Phillip, 11:58
- RE: Nomcom 2007-8: Randomness Sources for review, Eastlake III Donald-LDE008, 11:56
- draft-williams-on-channel-binding: IANA rules too complicated, Sam Hartman, 10:54
- Re: Application knowledge of transport characteristics, Dave Crocker, 10:32
- Re: Application knowledge of transport characteristics (was: Re: Domain Centric Administration), Tom.Petch, 10:17
- Re: tsv-dir review of draft-ietf-xcon-bfcp-connection-04, Cullen Jennings, 09:41
- Re: the evilness of NAT-PT, was: chicago IETF IPv6 connectivity, Iljitsch van Beijnum, 09:38
- Re: Nomcom 2007-8: Randomness Sources for review, Lakshminath Dondeti, 09:09
- Re: Nomcom 2007-8: Randomness Sources for review, Suresh Krishnan, 08:41
- RE: tsv-dir review of draft-ietf-xcon-bfcp-connection-04, Black_David, 07:03
- Re: chicago IETF IPv6 connectivity, Marc Blanchet, 07:00
- Re: Should I* opinions be afforded a special status? (Re: [saag] Declining the ifare bof for Chicago), Tony Li, 06:45
- Re: chicago IETF IPv6 connectivity, Tony Li, 06:45
- Re: tsv-dir review of draft-ietf-xcon-bfcp-connection-04, Gonzalo Camarillo, 06:45
- Consideration of draft-lior-radius-attribute-type-extension-02.txt, Bernard Aboba, 06:45
- Re: draft-ietf-v6ops-natpt-to-historic-00.txt, Tony Li, 06:45
- Re: Should I* opinions be afforded a special status? (Re: [saag] Declining the ifare bof for Chicago), Tony Li, 06:45
- Updating the rules?, Brian E Carpenter, 00:30
July 04, 2007
- Putting technology on the table [Re: Domain Centric Administration, RE: draft-ietf-v6ops-natpt-to-historic-00.txt], Brian E Carpenter, 23:48
- Re: Nomcom 2007-8: Randomness Sources for review, Lakshminath Dondeti, 23:14
- Re: chicago IETF IPv6 connectivity, Keith Moore, 18:10
- RE: chicago IETF IPv6 connectivity, Hallam-Baker, Phillip, 17:35
- Re: Nomcom 2007-8: Randomness Sources for review, Lakshminath Dondeti, 12:27
- Re: Nomcom 2007-8: Randomness Sources for review, Ole Jacobsen, 11:44
- RE: Domain Centric Administration, RE: draft-ietf-v6ops-natpt-to-historic-00.txt, John C Klensin, 11:28
- Re: Nomcom 2007-8: Randomness Sources for review, Lakshminath Dondeti, 11:10
- Re: Nomcom 2007-8: Randomness Sources for review, Suresh Krishnan, 10:59
- RE: Domain Centric Administration, RE: draft-ietf-v6ops-natpt-to-historic-00.txt, michael.dillon, 07:52
- Re: Domain Centric Administration, RE: draft-ietf-v6ops-natpt-to-historic-00.txt, Joe Baptista, 07:40
- RE: Domain Centric Administration, RE: draft-ietf-v6ops-natpt-to-historic-00.txt, John C Klensin, 07:05
- Re: Domain Centric Administration, RE: draft-ietf-v6ops-natpt-to-historic-00.txt, Joe Baptista, 06:59
- Re: Domain Centric Administration, RE: draft-ietf-v6ops-natpt-to-historic-00.txt, Brian E Carpenter, 04:24
- RE: Domain Centric Administration, RE: draft-ietf-v6ops-natpt-to-historic-00.txt, michael.dillon, 03:50
- RE: Domain Centric Administration, RE: draft-ietf-v6ops-natpt-to-historic-00.txt, SM, 00:05
July 03, 2007
- RE: chicago IETF IPv6 connectivity, Michel Py, 21:39
- Re: chicago IETF IPv6 connectivity, Keith Moore, 20:17
- Re: chicago IETF IPv6 connectivity, Keith Moore, 19:22
- Re: Domain Centric Administration, RE: draft-ietf-v6ops-natpt-to-historic-00.txt, Stephen Sprunk, 18:02
- Re: chicago IETF IPv6 connectivity, Douglas Otis, 16:40
- RE: chicago IETF IPv6 connectivity, Hallam-Baker, Phillip, 15:47
- Mailman request spam exploit, Douglas Otis, 14:39
- Re: chicago IETF IPv6 connectivity, Jun-ichiro itojun Hagino, 13:26
- Re: chicago IETF IPv6 connectivity, Clint Chaplin, 13:20
- Re: chicago IETF IPv6 connectivity, Keith Moore, 12:56
- RE: Domain Centric Administration, Hallam-Baker, Phillip, 12:55
- RE: Domain Centric Administration, RE: draft-ietf-v6ops-natpt-to-historic-00.txt, Christian Huitema, 12:41
- Re: Domain Centric Administration, RE: draft-ietf-v6ops-natpt-to-historic-00.txt, Douglas Otis, 12:14
- Re: chicago IETF IPv6 connectivity, Douglas Otis, 12:14
- Re: chicago IETF IPv6 connectivity, Clint Chaplin, 12:05
- Re: Domain Centric Administration, RE: draft-ietf-v6ops-natpt-to-historic-00.txt, Jun-ichiro itojun Hagino, 11:14
- Re: Domain Centric Administration, RE: draft-ietf-v6ops-natpt-to-historic-00.txt, Jun-ichiro itojun Hagino, 11:08
- Re: Domain Centric Administration, RE: draft-ietf-v6ops-natpt-to-historic-00.txt, Jun-ichiro itojun Hagino, 10:52
- RE: Domain Centric Administration, RE: draft-ietf-v6ops-natpt-to-historic-00.txt, Hallam-Baker, Phillip, 10:21
- Application knowledge of transport characteristics (was: Re: Domain Centric Administration), Dave Crocker, 10:11
- Re: Domain Centric Administration, RE: draft-ietf-v6ops-natpt-to-historic-00.txt, Keith Moore, 10:03
- Re: Domain Centric Administration, RE: draft-ietf-v6ops-natpt-to-historic-00.txt, Jun-ichiro itojun Hagino, 09:58
- Re: Domain Centric Administration, RE: draft-ietf-v6ops-natpt-to-historic-00.txt, Joel Jaeggli, 09:57
- RE: Domain Centric Administration, RE: draft-ietf-v6ops-natpt-to-historic-00.txt, Hallam-Baker, Phillip, 09:54
- Re: Domain Centric Administration, RE: draft-ietf-v6ops-natpt-to-historic-00.txt, Keith Moore, 09:36
- Re: Domain Centric Administration, RE: draft-ietf-v6ops-natpt-to-historic-00.txt, Keith Moore, 09:24
- Re: Domain Centric Administration, RE: draft-ietf-v6ops-natpt-to-historic-00.txt, Noel Chiappa, 09:24
- Re: Domain Centric Administration, RE: draft-ietf-v6ops-natpt-to-historic-00.txt, Jun-ichiro itojun Hagino, 09:14
- Re: Domain Centric Administration, RE: draft-ietf-v6ops-natpt-to-historic-00.txt, Keith Moore, 08:53
- Re: Domain Centric Administration, RE: draft-ietf-v6ops-natpt-to-historic-00.txt, Marshall Eubanks, 08:46
- RE: Domain Centric Administration, RE: draft-ietf-v6ops-natpt-to-historic-00.txt, Hallam-Baker, Phillip, 08:38
- RE: chicago IETF IPv6 connectivity, Hallam-Baker, Phillip, 08:38
- RE: Domain Centric Administration, RE: draft-ietf-v6ops-natpt-to-historic-00.txt, Hallam-Baker, Phillip, 08:38
- RE: Domain Centric Administration, RE: draft-ietf-v6ops-natpt-to-historic-00.txt, Hallam-Baker, Phillip, 08:38
- Re: chicago IETF IPv6 connectivity, Joel Jaeggli, 08:36
- Re: Domain Centric Administration, RE: draft-ietf-v6ops-natpt-to-historic-00.txt, Noel Chiappa, 07:52
- Re: chicago IETF IPv6 connectivity, Arnt Gulbrandsen, 07:14
- Re: Domain Centric Administration, RE: draft-ietf-v6ops-natpt-to-historic-00.txt, Melinda Shore, 03:37
- RE: Domain Centric Administration, RE: draft-ietf-v6ops-natpt-to-historic-00.txt, michael.dillon, 01:43
- Re: chicago IETF IPv6 connectivity, Thierry Ernst, 01:06
- Re: draft-ietf-v6ops-natpt-to-historic-00.txt, Brian E Carpenter, 00:25
July 02, 2007
- RE: Domain Centric Administration, RE: draft-ietf-v6ops-natpt-to-historic-00.txt, SM, 22:00
- Re: Domain Centric Administration, RE: draft-ietf-v6ops-natpt-to-historic-00.txt, Mark Andrews, 21:12
- Re: Domain Centric Administration, RE: draft-ietf-v6ops-natpt-to-historic-00.txt, Keith Moore, 20:46
- Re: Domain Centric Administration, RE: draft-ietf-v6ops-natpt-to-historic-00.txt, David Conrad, 20:19
- Re: Domain Centric Administration, RE: draft-ietf-v6ops-natpt-to-historic-00.txt, Ned Freed, 19:34
- RE: Domain Centric Administration, RE: draft-ietf-v6ops-natpt-to-historic-00.txt, Hallam-Baker, Phillip, 19:01
- Re: Domain Centric Administration, RE: draft-ietf-v6ops-natpt-to-historic-00.txt, Mark Andrews, 18:50
- Re: Domain Centric Administration, RE: draft-ietf-v6ops-natpt-to-historic-00.txt, David Morris, 18:15
- RE: Domain Centric Administration, RE: draft-ietf-v6ops-natpt-to-historic-00.txt, Jun-ichiro itojun Hagino, 16:51
- Re: chicago IETF IPv6 connectivity, Dave Crocker, 16:21
- Re: Domain Centric Administration, RE: draft-ietf-v6ops-natpt-to-historic-00.txt, Jun-ichiro itojun Hagino, 16:15
- Re: Domain Centric Administration, RE: draft-ietf-v6ops-natpt-to-historic-00.txt, Mark Andrews, 16:12
- Re: chicago IETF IPv6 connectivity, Jun-ichiro itojun Hagino, 16:12
- Re: Should not URIs be resources and not actions, Masataka Ohta, 15:54
- RE: draft-ietf-v6ops-natpt-to-historic-00.txt, Hallam-Baker, Phillip, 14:12
- RE: Domain Centric Administration, RE: draft-ietf-v6ops-natpt-to-historic-00.txt, Hallam-Baker, Phillip, 14:03
- RE: Should not URIs be resources and not actions, Hallam-Baker, Phillip, 13:56
- RE: draft-ietf-v6ops-natpt-to-historic-00.txt, Hallam-Baker, Phillip, 13:45
- Re: chicago IETF IPv6 connectivity, Keith Moore, 13:39
- Re: Domain Centric Administration, RE: draft-ietf-v6ops-natpt-to-historic-00.txt, Keith Moore, 13:38
- RE: Domain Centric Administration, RE: draft-ietf-v6ops-natpt-to-historic-00.txt, Hallam-Baker, Phillip, 13:34
- Re: Domain Centric Administration, RE: draft-ietf-v6ops-natpt-to-historic-00.txt, Keith Moore, 12:58
- Re: chicago IETF IPv6 connectivity, Dave Crocker, 12:45
- Re: Domain Centric Administration, RE: draft-ietf-v6ops-natpt-to-historic-00.txt, Keith Moore, 12:41
- Re: Should not URIs be resources and not actions, Eric Burger, 12:19
- Re: Domain Centric Administration, RE: draft-ietf-v6ops-natpt-to-historic-00.txt, Douglas Otis, 12:09
- RE: draft-ietf-v6ops-natpt-to-historic-00.txt, Noel Chiappa, 12:09
- RE: Domain Centric Administration, RE: draft-ietf-v6ops-natpt-to-historic-00.txt, Hallam-Baker, Phillip, 11:51
- RE: Domain Centric Administration, RE: draft-ietf-v6ops-natpt-to-historic-00.txt, Hallam-Baker, Phillip, 11:17
- Re: Domain Centric Administration, RE: draft-ietf-v6ops-natpt-to-historic-00.txt, Jeroen Massar, 11:11
- Re: Domain Centric Administration, RE: draft-ietf-v6ops-natpt-to-historic-00.txt, John C Klensin, 11:07
- Re: Domain Centric Administration, RE: draft-ietf-v6ops-natpt-to-historic-00.txt, Brian E Carpenter, 11:00
- Re: draft-ietf-v6ops-natpt-to-historic-00.txt, Elwyn Davies, 10:46
- RE: draft-ietf-v6ops-natpt-to-historic-00.txt, Hallam-Baker, Phillip, 10:45
- Re: Domain Centric Administration, RE: draft-ietf-v6ops-natpt-to-historic-00.txt, Jeffrey Hutzelman, 10:07
- Re: chicago IETF IPv6 connectivity, Jeffrey Hutzelman, 09:56
- Re: Domain Centric Administration, RE: draft-ietf-v6ops-natpt-to-historic-00.txt, Melinda Shore, 09:53
- RE: draft-ietf-v6ops-natpt-to-historic-00.txt, Christian Huitema, 09:45
- RE: Domain Centric Administration, RE: draft-ietf-v6ops-natpt-to-historic-00.txt, Hallam-Baker, Phillip, 09:43
- Re: chicago IETF IPv6 connectivity, Iljitsch van Beijnum, 08:59
- Re: Domain Centric Administration, RE: draft-ietf-v6ops-natpt-to-historic-00.txt, Melinda Shore, 08:25
- RE: Domain Centric Administration, RE: draft-ietf-v6ops-natpt-to-historic-00.txt, Hallam-Baker, Phillip, 08:18
- Re: Domain Centric Administration, RE: draft-ietf-v6ops-natpt-to-historic-00.txt, Jun-ichiro itojun Hagino, 07:21
- Domain Centric Administration, RE: draft-ietf-v6ops-natpt-to-historic-00.txt, Hallam-Baker, Phillip, 07:05
- Re: draft-ietf-v6ops-natpt-to-historic-00.txt, Noel Chiappa, 06:09
- secdir review of draft-ietf-dhc-server-override-04.txt, Stephen Hanna, 05:24
- Re: IPv6 transition technologies, Jun-ichiro itojun Hagino, 01:40
- Re: IPv6 transition technologies, Brian E Carpenter, 01:37
- draft-ietf-v6ops-natpt-to-historic-00.txt, Jun-ichiro itojun Hagino, 01:31
July 01, 2007
- Re: IPv6 transition technologies, Paul Hoffman, 18:03
- Re: IPv6 transition technologies, John C Klensin, 17:38
- Re: chicago IETF IPv6 connectivity, Jun-ichiro itojun Hagino, 17:26
- Re: chicago IETF IPv6 connectivity, Philip Matthews, 13:33
- Re: IPv6 transition technologies, Paul Hoffman, 10:52
- IPv6 transition technologies, Jun-ichiro itojun Hagino, 09:57
- Re: chicago IETF IPv6 connectivity, Keith Moore, 09:49
- Re: chicago IETF IPv6 connectivity, Jeroen Massar, 08:28
- Re: chicago IETF IPv6 connectivity, Jun-ichiro itojun Hagino, 08:04
- Re: chicago IETF IPv6 connectivity, Paul Hoffman, 07:51
- Re: chicago IETF IPv6 connectivity, Dave Crocker, 06:38
- Re: chicago IETF IPv6 connectivity, Jun-ichiro itojun Hagino, 05:37