<<Sorry for the top-posting...>>
First of all, thank you for your reply...
From the presentation I understand that I should 'convince' the WG first
(page 14). Since a WG for HTTP does not exist and I've already talked to the
http-wg mailing list, should I follow the suggested
'Individuals->WG->IETF->IESG' path and ask this list?
Also, I believe that I've already seen most of the things that the
presenations shows in BCP9 and the other docs I've read. Did I miss
something?
On Sunday 02 September 2007, xupeili 18916 wrote:
Hi, Stefanos
There is an excellent tutorial on how to bring new work to the IETF here:
http://edu.ietf.org/node/view/69
Peili
----- Original Message -----
From: Stefanos Harhalakis <v13(_at_)priest(_dot_)com>
Date: Monday, September 3, 2007 0:09 am
Subject: What to do next?
Hello there,
I've wrote and submitted a draft [1]. I've also asked for
feedback at the
http-wg mailing list. I believe that there is no more feedback
coming from
the http-wg list and I'd like an advice on what to do next. (The
draft
describes a method for HTTP to support on-demand headers)
Should I ask browser developers for more feedback? Should I try
to implement
this? Something tells me that I should not submit it to IESG yet.
I've read
RFC and I-D guidelines and BCP9, but I'm still not sure what to do.
All advices will be greatly appreciated...
Best regards,
Harhalakis Stefanos
[1] https://datatracker.ietf.org/drafts/draft-sharhalakis-httphreq/
(2nd
version is submitted and should be visible soon)
_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf
_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf